Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Charlotte Panthers' Best-Value Contract


SBBlue
 Share

Recommended Posts

link:The Best-Value Contract on Every NFL Roster Entering 2021 Season | Bleacher Report | Latest News, Videos and Highlights

S Jeremy Chinn

The Carolina Panthers are a rebuilding team with a lot of young players who have flashed but have yet to earn long-term extensions.

Two-time 1,000-yard receiver DJ Moore will make just $3.6 million in the fourth year of his rookie deal, promising cornerback Donte Jackson will collect just $2.8 million under the same circumstances and 2020 first-round pick Derrick Brown will earn a reasonable $5.9 million per year. 

But all of the above are easily trumped by surprise sensation Jeremy Chinn, who crushed it as a 22-year-old rookie safety/linebacker in 2020 but was only the 64th overall selection in last year's draft. 

Per Pro Football Focus, only three rookie defenders registered more stops than the Southern Illinois product (30) during a campaign in which he was runner-up for the Defensive Rookie of the Year award. And he did all that for less than $1 million. 

In terms of average annual salary, Chinn is the 885th-highest-paid player in the league.      

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Agreed. 

 

22 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Using rookie contracts in that list feels like cheating. Excluding rookie contracts would be a more interesting list.

I understand your point, but I'm not sure how to handle it. 

Chinn had the most tackles on the team.  He was also on a very cheap rookie contract.

Do we disregard him because he is a rookie?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, SBBlue said:

 

I understand your point, but I'm not sure how to handle it. 

Chinn had the most tackles on the team.  He was also on a very cheap rookie contract.

Do we disregard him because he is a rookie?

Yeah. Rookie contracts are just a different matter. They're by far the best avenue of getting a premium talent for a bargain price and there's no real negotiation in the contract.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SBBlue said:

 

I understand your point, but I'm not sure how to handle it. 

Chinn had the most tackles on the team.  He was also on a very cheap rookie contract.

Do we disregard him because he is a rookie?

I don't really think you are understanding what I am saying. It's a little bit of a lazy take by the author because it should largely be expected that the majority of the players on an unfiltered "best contract" list for the NFL would be pretty heavily weighted towards rookie contracts. It just basically becomes a "who is your best player on a rookie contract list." He is just sort of ignoring the obvious general NFL knowledge that your best bang for the buck is almost always going to be a rookie contract.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Pup McBarky said:

Depending on how he plays this year, Reddick would have to be a candidate for best value contract for a non-rookie deal.

Agreed. I think that is probably a much more interesting thing to break down than basically just a list of rookies. He kind of missed the mark on that article in general.

Reddick was the guy I had in mind, as well.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

 It's a little bit of a lazy take by the author

Yes, its bleacher report they are lazy.

Quote

It just basically becomes a "who is your best player on a rookie contract list." He is just sort of ignoring the obvious general NFL knowledge that your best bang for the buck is almost always going to be a rookie contract.

True, the majority on the list are those still on their original contracts, but not all...there were a few vets in there.  I guess you want two lists, one for vets and one for those still on their 4yr, because they are going to be cheaper.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SBBlue said:

Yes, its bleacher report they are lazy.

True, the majority on the list are those still on their original contracts, but not all...there were a few vets in there.  I guess you want two lists, one for vets and one for those still on their 4yr, because they are going to be cheaper.

 

I think it's just a much more interesting article if you eliminate the guys on rookie deals. It also requires a lot more effort to write. 

Then you get to get into guys who are outperforming their current deals, cheap free agent signings, etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Pup McBarky said:

Depending on how he plays this year, Reddick would have to be a candidate for best value contract for a non-rookie deal.

Then again, one year prove it deals can be seen in the same vein as rookie contracts. 

Projecting forward probably.

Looking at what we had last year, was it Robbie?

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I've already addressed this notion in a previous reply. You are basing your assertion outside reality if you think Bryce would have not only been more successful but defeated the Patriots in place of Herbert. Bryce got blown off the field by that Patriots team with the highest paid OL in the league. We've seen Bryce with an OL that gave up 65 sacks and it resulted in the #1 pick. And that is not a defense of Herbert or arguing he is a great QB in any way. He has physical talent but he has been similar to Darnold early in his career in terms of his very up and down perfomances. However that does not change the fact that they have significantly less invested in the OL than the Panthers.
    • I think Tepper has been setting the stage where pending there is no miracle he wipes it all clean.  Think you already have been told that with small things like Evero staying.  Bryce is the guy next year.  OC, DC, everything stays the same.  QB room largely the same.  Nothing would really matter there.  They basically get one more shot and it goes how the schedule paired with our 27th ranked O predictably most likely goes.  Everyone out the door together.  Bryce is a bridge tier QB.  I don’t see Dave surviving where he could be bridge QB here in reality. 
    • I think the D performed well over the season considering it was put together with Scotch tape. 
×
×
  • Create New...