Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Kawann Short cleared for football activities


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, AU-panther said:

People are fine with us paying 3-5 million a year for players that have never been good but not ok with a cheap one year deal for a player that was actually good at one time.

I’m not saying we should, but Short on a cheap one year deal isn’t that huge of a gamble.

 

It kind of is though. That's a roster spot for a guy who has been injured a lot and when he had played, he hasn't been more than average. I'd rather use that roster spot for a guy with more upside than KK right now. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

It kind of is though. That's a roster spot for a guy who has been injured a lot and when he had played, he hasn't been more than average. I'd rather use that roster spot for a guy with more upside than KK right now. 

I get that, but is a 1yr/$2m deal for Short any worse than a 2yr/10m deal for Erving?

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, AU-panther said:

I get that, but is a 1yr/$2m deal for Short any worse than a 2yr/10m deal for Erving?

Does KK wanna switch positions or something?  Because that is the only way to compare those deals.

I get nobody is thrilled with Erving or his pay, but the 2 positions demand different pay.  

Be free KK.  Go in peace big fella.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We have spent two years getting younger, and lowering our Cap. Let's not return to spending on aging Vets, hoping they can rekindle the flames. I usually doesn't happen. Usually anywho.

 

It doesn't matter if KK will pay us to play. He old. He gone. Fare thee well KK, fare thee well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Randy Moss ran a 4.3, Tee Higgins is a legit 220. He’s worked to get bigger/stronger since coming into the league. Tee Higgins makes tmac look skinny. The knock on McMillan is his play strength and getting pressed by physical corners, and he’s in this video shirtless literally looking like he doesn’t lift, ever. You don’t want your “big body” receiver that runs a 4.6 to be in the weight room and develop his play strength? Play strength he is documented on film as lacking? 
    • yeah, we drafted a WR in round 1.  All signs points he is going to have a development window.  Just like XL (another first round WR).  Neither of which are natural pairings with Bryce Young and how he plays the game.   Drafting Tmac isn't going to drastically alter things this season most likely.  in his final 8 games.....he was also meh/okay in 5 of the 8.  Which is great given what he was, which wasn't shouldn't even be on a NFL field caliber.    But the Panther passing attack as a whole or even cherry picked to only post benching......was a subpar NFL pass attack (which ranked dead last on the season). Too many IMO focus on the improvement vs where it actually stacks up vs the rest of the league.     again, the defense SHOULD improve.  Almost a certainty.  It was historically horrific.  So even a good improvement there leaves in the bottom 3rd of the league. 
×
×
  • Create New...