Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bouknight with the buzzer beater


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

On 8/10/2021 at 10:31 PM, My Chuck Dont Matter said:

KY’s program is probably done. They haven’t been good the last couple years. BJ Boston was a bust last season.  They have been able to still send some later picks like Herro, PJ, Maxey and Quickley to the pros. Nothing elite but good players. The last real elite talent from UK is probably Fox. Im not sure if Calipari even knew that Booker and Bam were going to to be this good. Overall, they have done really well sending some very good players into the NBA. 

Jesus

Chappelle Show Lol GIF

Edited by Shocker
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, My Chuck Dont Matter said:

Believe what you want mate

Just saying...Calipari is one of, if not the best recruiter in the nation...Kentucky gave him a life time deal for a reason.  They aren't going anywhere.  Much I might not like it

Edited by Shocker
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/13/2021 at 8:20 PM, CanePantherHornet said:

Monk never wanted to be here. I remember the night of the draft Calipari said he was disappointed because Malik didn't get to go to New York like he wanted. He was so sure he was going to the Knicks he was working out and staying there.

yup - if NYK took Monk - we would have gotten Donovan Mitchell (who Cliff had been arguing for) and our franchise would be in a much different place..

Kemba might not have left and Cliff might still be here.. also had a shot at Booker instead of Frank.. Beal instead of MKG.. we might have the all-time worst draft history.. lol

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's honestly pretty interesting just seeing this pairing play out. Canales’ offenses (Seattle, Tampa) are run-first, under-center, play-action systems built around defined reads and intermediate/deep timing throws. That structure worked when he had QBs like Baker Mayfield or Russell Wilson in a system that created clear launch points and sightlines. His success has always been tied to a credible run game + play-action gravity. You can see that with the Panthers team building philosophy as well. Coker and TMac both are bigger receivers that won't get the best YAC production but thrive as possession receivers in contested scenarios. They're not the best in space and creating additional yardage in such, and would likely fair better systematically with a stronger armed QB who can create better opportunities on those boundary 1v1 matchups with stronger throws. Bryce, on the other hand, is a spread-native QB. His strengths are rhythm, spacing, quick processing, and off-script creation. Asking him to live in condensed formations with long-developing play-action concepts just hasn't been his forte. And well, his boundary throws are limited in velocity which takes a big chunk of the playbook off. And I mean a QB like Bryce can still work, it's just Dave's offensive philosophy and foundation is very much at odds with Young's physical limits and his own experience. So it's certainly still a learning experience for Dave to figure out how he can mesh his offensive philosophy with Young's strengths. He's very inexperienced with maximizing Bryce's strengths with his system. Would love to see us bring in an OC with spread experience and adaptability to implement a cohesive system with Dave to allow Bryce to thrive, as it's obvious we're sticking with him for a bit longer.   
    • Only thing I really agreed with is questioning why we didn’t take any timeouts on their last drive.  I know hindsight is 20/20, but I think it would’ve saved clock bc they were desperate to score as soon as the opportunity presented itself, but I also think it could’ve helped the defense regroup and maybe give us a better chance to stop them.
×
×
  • Create New...