Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers game notes


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, micnificent28 said:

I mean how bad is Greg Little... we really don't know.. at times he looks functional when he's on the field. But the problem is that's rarely like a 2 game stretch. If little is available he's probably better than scott.

I think John L. Smith said it best:

If you have 2 offensive linemen, one whose a 5 every game, and the other whose a 1 or an 8, you'll take the guy whose a 5 every game. You can game plan around guys like that.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Madwolf said:

I think John L. Smith said it best:

If you have 2 offensive linemen, one whose a 5 every game, and the other whose a 1 or an 8, you'll take the guy whose a 5 every game. You can game plan around guys like that.

Yeah but you see what happened when he kept getting beat like a drum out there and who went in

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, dave-o said:

My game notes are we couldnt watch the game...  The Spectrum cable feed was so bad you would see a blip of every 3rd play....  

I think it's crap coverage on Fox actually. I've had Time Warner/Spectrum for years and while they are awful with almost every level of service on every front I believe it is more of a Fix issue. I've had it on games over the years where Fox goes in and out with spotty garbage reception and coverage yet I turn to a different channel and the reception/coverage is just fine. I have bitched about this crap for probably 15 years. I don't get it at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, YourLastThought said:

I think it's crap coverage on Fox actually. I've had Time Warner/Spectrum for years and while they are awful with almost every level of service on every front I believe it is more of a Fix issue. I've had it on games over the years where Fox goes in and out with spotty garbage reception and coverage yet I turn to a different channel and the reception/coverage is just fine. I have bitched about this crap for probably 15 years. I don't get it at all.

Announcers apologized for the crappy Fox coverage in Charlotte, but in Wilmington, it was spot on.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • XL could easily be the last dog at the bowl for WR production next year.  That could leave him around 200-300 yards which would be disastrous.
    • Well sure, that's where the disconnect is then. If Thielen only gets 300-400 yards and T-Mac is healthy for the full season, then I'm with you guys, in that scenario there is absolutely zero excuse for him to not put up over 1,000 yards.   In fact, I'll let you double that, if Thielen has only 600 yards, then again, my expectations are for T-Mac to surpass the 1k mark with ease. But his game has never been about his physical abilities, so even if he loses a half a step, he's still the same player who is a savvy route runner who will get open and Bryce will continue to find him due to their chemistry.  Particularly since Bryce isn't a QB who forces things, he takes what the defense gives him.  So when teams focus on T-Mac and Thielen is more free to find those holes in the defense than he has the last two years, I don't think Bryce is going to ignore him. If someone wants to argue for T-Mac getting to 1,000 yards, personally, I'd say those yards would be far more likelier to come from XL and Coker than Thielen.  And that has nothing to do with XL or Coker, but that I'm still a firm believer in Thielen being able to still get 50-60 yards a game, again, particularly as he'll have less defensive attention on him than in either of his 2 seasons with us so far. Just because T-Mac is our #1 of the future who will have the ball forced to him at times, doesn't mean he needs to be forced into that role from day 1 when we have 3 very legitimate WR options next to him. Let the rookie grow into the role and the NFL game, we have that ability to do so because of Thielen, XL, and Coker.
    • Spot on. He's only 20 and his height 6'2 and weight 230lbs might make him more of an off-ball LB possibility. He's a multi-year project
×
×
  • Create New...