Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Starting RG on covid list


CRA
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, CatfanMO said:

How did people survive before the internet/tv/radio days? No need to try to answer that question, it will only make you look less educated. 

LMFAO. I don't think you're making the point that you think you're making. What a moron. 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, CatfanMO said:

How did people survive before the internet/tv/radio days? No need to try to answer that question, it will only make you look less educated. 

Newspapers. Still a form of media. They also trusted their health professionals. Q Anon would have trouble surviving without internet/social media.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So we still don't know which county LG was wrong about or why it matters that he was wrong?

Oof.  Maybe he wasn't wrong, maybe he got percentages wrong by a small bit... But if the counties are reporting his numbers, or within a few percents of em, he seems to be in the right...

Why do I suspect this has to do with hospitalization numbers and someone arguing the vaccine doesn't work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Ready 2 Win said:

check the mod reports. I listed both county and US census data. 

You're the one making this an issue. Don't ask me to do your research for you. Again, post your data. Explain exactly why it's relevant to whatever point you're trying to make which still isn't at all clear.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

You're the one making this an issue. Don't ask me to do your research for you. Again, post your data. Explain exactly why it's relevant to whatever point you're trying to make which still isn't at all clear.

I had really hoped you would prefer not to expose you in public. I have already done so via report and they obviously turned a blind eye. I will post the links and info here, in which i am sure you or some other mod will quickly ban me. rest assured, you were so wrong that 61% of people in that county were vaccinated, and spread false news. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, CatfanMO said:

We already established you cant think for yourself. 

Ok mister "How did people survive before radio/tv/internet"

164690919_lifeexpectancy.thumb.png.edb4e92709da9e7acef7e527a4742582.png

 

I'm sure you can figure out when the radio was invented. Before you go all stupid on me - I'm not saying that the radio has made people live longer in a vacuum. However, the ability to transmit data and information at a greater and greater capacity has allowed for increasingly more efficient medical innovation amongst other reasons for a higher life expectancy due to the free flow of information.

As I said before. You're getting your information from somewhere, some source. You're not standing out in your cow field reading the clouds to glean the knowledge that you're using to be such a free thinker. Which is why I pointed out your direct lie about "I turned the news off". You didn't and you haven't. You've just retreated into your own cozy little world of ignorance rather than actually creating your opinions from actual experts in any individual field. You're not reading medical/research papers in lieu of news sources, because if you were you wouldn't have opinions that stand in contrast with the medical community. 

Edited by Floppin
  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Ready 2 Win said:

I had really hoped you would prefer not to expose you in public. I have already done so via report and they obviously turned a blind eye. I will post the links and info here, in which i am sure you or some other mod will quickly ban me. rest assured, you were so wrong that 61% of people in that county were vaccinated, and spread false news. 

 

 

If I'm wrong it's because Buncombe County is incorrectly reporting. I pulled those numbers directly from their website.

What point are you trying to make here?

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, stbugs said:

OMG, just post it already dude. You are wasting everyone’s time here. If you had anything special you would have posted it. If you truly are collecting screenshots then that’s comical in its own way, but it should be easy to expose the truth. We need to know the truth, make it public, become a hero.

I doubt he has anything of significance… He needs to go back to listening to the MyPillow guy talk about this August takeover. Oh wait it’s September already??

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I was technically incorrect. From Buncombe County's website:

Currently, 63% of the total population in the county has received at least one dose of vaccine and 59% of the total population in the county is fully vaccinated.

https://www.buncombecounty.org/countycenter/news-detail.aspx?id=18543

It was 63% with at least one dose. 63% for fully vaxxed. Since we're a week past that info we probably are closing in on 63% now.

If that info is wrong, it's on Buncombe County.

 

Its not on the county. Dont blame the county. You are a Mod. The buck stops with you. I think you made fun of me when I made a comment about using alts. This is the kind of bullshit you should say with your alt account...not your main and MOD account. 

But here we go. See attached file for baseless claim said MODERATOR posted. 

Now the evidence. 

Doses Administered in Buncombe County according to a source out wonderful mod would not cite. 97,300+ 

Source: https://www.buncombecounty.org/Governing/Depts/Health/News_Detail.aspx?id=19057

Population of Buncombe Country according to latest US census: 261,191. 

Source: https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/buncombecountynorthcarolina


But you are so wrong bro. Really, mods should not engage and be wrong on their main, 

If you do the math, the percentage is 37.27 . A FAR cry from the uncited stay of 61% touted by a Mod. 

 

KakaoTalk_20210907_234351360.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Ready 2 Win said:

Its not on the county. Dont blame the county. You are a Mod. The buck stops with you. I think you made fun of me when I made a comment about using alts. This is the kind of bullshit you should say with your alt account...not your main and MOD account. 

But here we go. See attached file for baseless claim said MODERATOR posted. 

Now the evidence. 

Doses Administered in Buncombe County according to a source out wonderful mod would not cite. 97,300+ 

Source: https://www.buncombecounty.org/Governing/Depts/Health/News_Detail.aspx?id=19057

Population of Buncombe Country according to latest US census: 261,191. 

Source: https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/buncombecountynorthcarolina


But you are so wrong bro. Really, mods should not engage and be wrong on their main, 

If you do the math, the percentage is 37.27 . A FAR cry from the uncited stay of 61% touted by a Mod. 

 

KakaoTalk_20210907_234351360.jpg

Hahaha.  This dude tells is the actual data on percentage vaccinated is wrong for the county but the doses administered isn't, but didn't notice the big text disclaimer of "NOTICE: (Wednesday, June 30 to Wednesday, July 18, 2021)"  Oooooof.

Edited by mav1234
  • Pie 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I was watching a YouTube and it was said that scout and GM insider types were saying the NIL had killed rounds 4-7. I don’t know that I buy it, seems like it might for a year or maybe two but then those guys have to move on.  NCAA is apparently about to give 5 years of eligibility. It is gonna skew those entrants older maybe.   
    • Miller being less raw and more pro ready makes sense of why they picked him. With us having a capable starter in Walker the lower floor higher ceiling player makes sense for us as well. I agree with that. 
    • I'm from Michigan and have had this discussion with my Lions friends, and they all agree with me, they were never going to take Freeling over Miller.  As, yes, you are correct, they could have left Sewell at RT and taken Freeling, but they are in a SB contention window right now. An OL with Freeling at LT and Sewell at RT is not as strong as Sewell at LT and Miller at RT would be for this upcoming season and likely at least next year as well. 5 years it could be looked back upon as a long term "mistake" to take Miller over Freeling, but for a franchise like the Lions, you can't worry about the long term when you have current SB aspirations.  It's all about maximizing their current SB window over the next 1-3 years. And it's not about style, it's about day 1 readiness, and a lot of "experts" aren't even sure if Freeling is ready to play Week 1 yet at the position he's used to, let alone switching to a side he hasn't played before, but a career starting RT is going to be more than ready to fill that role for them Week 1. I'm 100% convinced that if our draft positioning was swapped, we'd have still taken Freeling, they'd have still taken Miller, and both teams would have got the OT that they preferred due to what each team needs right now and what their current realistic aspirations are for the 2026 season. We're in a position where we can let our drafted OT sit and learn for a bit, they needed a week 1 starter, for me that's where this discussion becomes very easy to understand why each team took the player they did.
×
×
  • Create New...