Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2021-2022 Games Thread


Captain Morgan
 Share

Recommended Posts

19 minutes ago, NCTHFL0567 said:

Correct and we're probably losing Bridges in the offseason because we can't afford him. Sigh. 

Nah Miles isn't going anywhere. This is his and LaMelo's team now. They are your future. From there you shape things out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, NCTHFL0567 said:

Enlighten me on how we keep Bridges with all this salary wrapped up in Hayward, Rozier, and Oubre? 

I think we see some big trades in the future. But it all depends on how this play in goes. Hayward is pretty much done man that guy is never going to finish another season. The Hornets can surely see this regardless of what happens tonight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, MillionDollarCam said:

Yeah it’s ridiculous… I mean it was blatantly obvious… Jru Holiday played less than a minute so he could get his bonus and then he went to the bench while Sandro Mamukelashvili, Thansis Antetokounmpo, Jordan Nwora, Jevon Carter, Rayjon Tucker, and Lindell Wigginton played the rest of the game…

The NBA has said something about dropping back to 72 games or so again. I saw they gave the reasons as being less nights off for the bigger stars and to make late season games more competitive. That might help, but I don't think it'll matter if a team really wants to tank a game. The only thing that will stop that is massive fines and taking draft picks away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, jayboogieman said:

The NBA has said something about dropping back to 72 games or so again. I saw they gave the reasons as being less nights off for the bigger stars and to make late season games more competitive. That might help, but I don't think it'll matter if a team really wants to tank a game. The only thing that will stop that is massive fines and taking draft picks away.

If the Hornets had the opportunity to lose to create a more favorable matchup for themselves I would 100% want them to do it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, frankw said:

I think we see some big trades in the future. But it all depends on how this play in goes. Hayward is pretty much done man that guy is never going to finish another season. The Hornets can surely see this regardless of what happens tonight.

How are they going to trade that albatross of a contract though? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, NCTHFL0567 said:

What money? You act like the Hornets got a ton of cap room? You know Miles is going to want over 20 mill, right? 

Pay him. Don't want to count a man's money but Jordan can pay into the luxury until we can offload Gordon and be just fine. You understand it isn't a hard cap. Right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, toldozer said:

Pay him. Don't want to count a man's money but Jordan can pay into the luxury until we can offload Gordon and be just fine. You understand it isn't a hard cap. Right?

How are we going to offload Hayward? Who in their rightful mind would take Hayward? You keep thinking this shitt is easy like it's going to be done soon. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You kinda gloss over this, but this is really at the crux of this whole argument....which Flacco are we talking here?  You bring up that he played with 3 different teams but ignore the fact that his performance varied quite a bit from team to team. 2024 Colts: 65.3% completion, 12 TDs, 7 INTs, 220.1 YPG, 7.1 Y/A, 90.5 rating 2025 Browns: 58.1% completion, 2 TDs, 6 INTs, 203.8 YPG, 5.1 Y/A, 60.3 rating 2025 Bengals: 63.4% completion, 12 TDs, 3 INTs, 290.6 YPG, 6.8 Y/A, 96.2 rating 2025 Flacco (Browns + Bengals): 61.1% completion, 14 TDs, 9 INTs, 252.0 YPG, 6.1 Y/A, 80.8 rating vs. 2025 Bryce: 62.7% completion, 14 TDs, 7 INTs, 196.2 YPG, 6.2 Y/A, 86.0 rating I bolded the comparison that I think objectively makes the most sense...just simply comparing the two QBs for the entire season.  Otherwise you'd be cherry-picking Flacco's time with the Bengals and ignoring his earlier stint with the Browns, which sounds an awful lot like people cherry-picking Bryce's stats in the second half of last season. So again, which Flacco?  Basically the only thing consistent with Flacco across each of these teams was his W/L records: 2-4, 1-3, and 1-4 respectively.  I'd say if we're comparing each version of him to Bryce this year: Colts Flacco > 2025 Bryce, Browns Flacco <<< 2025 Bryce, Bengals Flacco >> 2025 Bryce, and 2025 Flacco < 2025 Bryce - Flacco this year only beats out Bryce on YPG but in part because he throws significantly more passes (almost 60 YPG more than Bryce, despite a lower Y/A which is pretty telling) .  Flacco is maybe the most apt case study about how important a QB's circumstances are to his success.  He was easily a bottom 3 QB in Cleveland and arguably top 10-15 in Cincinnati...and we're talking about the same player from the same season.  All that happened was taking him from one team and plopping him onto another team; nothing inherently changed about him as a QB.  Funny enough I think that's all that one dude on here was trying to say when he made that long poorly-received post after having an epiphany working for PFF behind the scenes or w/e.  That it's largely short-sighted to just try to evaluate QBs in a vacuum when there are so many variables at play that ultimately decide whether a QB is successful or not.   I think Bryce has been mediocre at best this season and I'm ready to move on regardless of how he ends this season - I'm highly skeptical a strong end to the season will carry over into next year considering how last year ended and this year began.  I would certainly agree that he's a bottom-third QB this year.  I just don't understand you scoffing indignantly at anyone holding the opinion that Bryce has had a better season than Flacco...I can only assume it's recency bias.  Or maybe you know the stats don't support you, which is why you're conjuring up the god-forsaken arbitrary "eyeball test" which is the kinda thing people in here were saying about Fields for years, pinky promising that he really truly was a franchise QB despite his awful stats.  Perhaps it's called the eyeball test because I roll my eyes anytime I hear someone bring it up seriously as an argument.
    • CMC said he expected to play his career here.  He didn't think he would be traded.  Carolina decided they wanted to trade him.  He picked here he wanted to go.   But we dumped him.  For largely peanuts.   But we dumped DJ Moore and he never had a blood and guts game.   So it's never a guarantee. 
    • I have many people telling me CMC was blindsided and heartbroken by the trade, but that's not how I remember everything going down.  49ers are pretty wounded right now on defense so if our offense can sustain drives and score, that'd be the difference maker. Their offense? I'm not scared of CMC. 
×
×
  • Create New...