Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

More Illuminating Stats/Context On What's Happening With Sam and Robby


Proudiddy
 Share

Recommended Posts

17 minutes ago, CRA said:

DJ Moore has been an absolute beast on the year.  

this overall is just a Robby Anderson issue.  

And the fact we paid him so heavily is impacting IMO the ability for the rookies to get the reps they should be getting.   Rhule and company overpaid Anderson and he just isn’t what his one year anomaly season suggested …and here we are.  

 

DJ is doing well...I agree...but hes not impacting the game.... he gets his catches. He really acts low keyed..and Robby....Hes got me all pissed off...maybe its cause Sam is throwing to both of them...like up in NY..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Pimpdaddy said:

DJ is doing well...I agree...but hes not impacting the game.... he gets his catches. He really acts low keyed..and Robby....Hes got me all pissed off...maybe its cause Sam is throwing to both of them...like up in NY..

DJ is having some big time catches.  Darnold and he aren't always connecting tho. 

Robby is a different issue...

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, mav1234 said:

I've seen people say this a couple times so I wanted to point out why this is a bad take from his season-by-season numbers.

Remember, Darnold missed a total of 6 games in 2018 and 2019; so, by the hypothesis that the Robby was more productive without him would suggest we could look at those 6 games to get an idea on if this is true, or perhaps something else pushed Robby's production down in 2018/2019.  Take a wild guess what the data shows?

Robby without Darnold in 2018: only 2 games played, 6 catches for 70 yards, 11.67 yards/reception, 0 TDs

Robby with Darnold in 2018:  12 games, 44 receptions for 682 yards, 15.5 yards/reception, 6 TDs

Robby without Darnold in 2019: 3 games, 8 receptions, 102 yads, 13.50 yards/reception, 0 TDs

Robby with Darnold in 2019: 13 games, 44 receptions for 671 yards, 15.2 yards/reception, 5 TDs

Sure with such a small sample it is hard to say for sure if Darnold really was driving Robby down, but the Jets team from 2017 to 2018 was pretty different, and not just in terms of starting QBs. Plus, his yards/reception didn't actually go down from 2017 to 2018 or 2019 (all 3 were 15ish) - that didn't happen until 2020 with Bridgewater when it dropped to 11.5 (and fwiw it is a bit higher this year with Darnold).

So are you leaving out the fact that Robbie was coming back from injury in one of those 2018 games and was on limited snaps? Take away that game and he had 4 catches for 48 yards which was around his per game average with Darnold. So with a journey man QB in Mccown he put a little less yards and about the same in receptions. 
 

Even then his numbers were still better without Darnold, and what good is yard per reception of you can’t even crack 800 yard marker. I’m willing to be Robby was happier with his roll in with Teddy than with Darnold.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, GoobyPls said:

So are you leaving out the fact that Robbie was coming back from injury in one of those 2018 games and was on limited snaps? Take away that game and he had 4 catches for 48 yards which was around his per game average with Darnold. So with a journey man QB in Mccown he put a little less yards and about the same in receptions. 
 

Even then his numbers were still better without Darnold, and what good is yard per reception of you can’t even crack 800 yard marker. I’m willing to be Robby was happier with his roll in with Teddy than with Darnold.

4 catches for 48 yards is 12 yards per reception which is 3 fewer yards per reception than with Darnold.  Not to mention we see the same pattern in 2019...

He may have been happier in the offense last year but blaming Darnold doesn't fit the data we have.  Brady is the one calling the plays and routes...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, mav1234 said:

4 catches for 48 yards is 12 yards per reception which is 3 fewer yards per reception than with Darnold.  Not to mention we see the same pattern in 2019...

He may have been happier in the offense last year but blaming Darnold doesn't fit the data we have.  Brady is the one calling the plays and routes...

Excepts it fits all the data. Congrats his yards per re emotion go up but all his other numbers suffer. 
 

Now it’s Brady fault Darnold can’t get the ball to Robby lol. Even the “drops” are all bad ball placements. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, CRA said:

RBs look good considering the OL talent.

DJ balling 

Ian Thomas finally showing something.  Tremble looking decent for a rookie being worked in.  

rookie WRs look good when we rarely see them. 

it’s basically the two guys the Jets didn’t want struggling the most.  It’s almost like the most painfully obvious answer is the right answer.  That we shouldn’t of built the core of our O with parts from the NY Jets…

Frankie Luvu would like a word with you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, GoobyPls said:

So are you leaving out the fact that Robbie was coming back from injury in one of those 2018 games and was on limited snaps? Take away that game and he had 4 catches for 48 yards which was around his per game average with Darnold. So with a journey man QB in Mccown he put a little less yards and about the same in receptions. 
 

Even then his numbers were still better without Darnold, and what good is yard per reception of you can’t even crack 800 yard marker. I’m willing to be Robby was happier with his roll in with Teddy than with Darnold.

Then he can f*ck right off to Denver to be with his BFF then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Many Panthers fans are already excited about second-round selection Nic Scourton for a variety of reasons including but not limited to: the Panthers needed to recharge the position group, Scourton had a late first-round grade according to many (including the Panthers), and he fit this season's modus operandi of stopping the run now and forever. However, Scourton was seen early on as one of the top-3 EDGE guys in this class but fell due to not having quite the season at Texas A&M as he did prior at Purdue (his sophomore season). It's been revealed since then a few different things that speak to that dip in production... Texas A&M, for one, requires each player on their line to be able to hold two gaps. This also explains why we saw low production across the board from the other two TA&M prospects but were still being heavily touted. Scourton was also said to have bulked up to 280lbs in order to fulfill this role and noticeably suffered from it. He's expected to play this season with Carolina at 255 - 260 which is very different from most situations. In most situations, teams are wanting players to gain 15 - 30. Since Scourton is going to be playing at his Purdue weight, I thought it would make sense to dive more into that tape. Y'all... we might have gotten something special... Let's take a quick peek at the stats before we start drooling over some highlights. First, a summary of the last two seasons for Scourton: Second, the game splits: The first thing that pops up for me is how Scourton's sack numbers were cut in half his senior year. We've already pointed out issues with scheme that impacted the TA&M linemen from racking up numbers, but seeing the game splits it's clear that Scourton didn't exactly feast on inferior competition while at Purdue. He had two two-sack games (vs. Michigan (2023 - 2024 champs), Indiana) and a 10-tackle game (vs. Nebraska). I also see the 2024 games where he went up against two top-10 tackles (Will Campbell from LSU + Armand Membou from Missouri) that I watched leading up to the draft.  For those who just want a summary: Scourton looked elite at Purdue and is going to be rotating in often during his rookie campaign. I originally had him penciled in as the second-string, strong-side edge defender behind Clowney but I wouldn't be surprised to see the team have him and Pat Jones II moving around when they rotate in in order to find where Nic looks best. Here's a highlight reel to replace that Cialias you lost in your recliner tonight:   For those that like to use their own eyes: Below I'll be linking the linking the five games I've mentioned above. If you plan to watch all of them, I highly recommend going in the order listed as that will allow you to see him vs. Campbell and then Membou while dealing with the aforementioned things he dealt with at Texas A&M before seeing him look unstoppable in 2023 when he was allowed to play both at a comfortable weight and in a scheme that didn't require him two cover two gaps nearly every play. vs. Will Campbell (2024) vs. Armand Membou (2024) vs. Nebraska (2023) vs. Michigan (2023)   vs. Indiana (2023)  
    • Yea, i honestly think he had almost as much say as Dan.  One of the main reasons I think that is Eager has said before he was ever with the Panthers, that you trade away picks for a qb and for any other position you do pick swaps, and that's exactly what we did.
    • For a LB that is a long career.  They take a beating.  Shoulders and head.  My favorite LB of All Time--Junior Seau--had a 20-year career--the average career for a STARTING MLB is 5.6 years.  I really think Shaq is done, but if he can play, it does not mean that he should.   Think about Morgan's career--7 seasons.  Luke's career--8 seasons.  Beason played only 93 games over 10 years--only 5 seasons where he played 15 games or more.  The other 5 seasons?  No more than 5 games per.  So basically, the average starting MLB plays 90 games in his career.  Shaq has played 123 games and was pretty injury free until the last 2 seasons (6 games total). 
×
×
  • Create New...