Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Sam Darnold : Will he make it to a 2nd season here?


glenwo2
 Share

Sam Darnold : Will he make it to a 2nd season here? (Poll)  

184 members have voted

  1. 1. Sam Darnold : Will he make it to a 2nd season here?

    • Yes, he will get one final chance with a (hopefully) upgraded O-Line
    • No. He's gone and good f'n riddance
    • Too Early to tell. Let's see how these next 11 games go

This poll is closed to new votes

  • Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.
  • Poll closed on 10/31/2021 at 09:00 PM

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

https://thedraftnetwork.com/articles/sam-howell-2022-nfl-draft-stock-mid-season-tdn100

 

Oline or not he is at best an average athlete with average size with an average arm.   Locks onto his wideouts and gets happy feet in the pocket.  He did this last season with a good oline.  He does throw a nice deep ball but I pray to God Darnold turns it around and we dont hitch our wagon to this.   Like kungfo says someone will probably fall in love with him in the top 10 but he is nowhere near worthy.

 

Where would he fit in this past years draft?   Probably after Mac Jones.  Thats telling. 

Yeah, I think he is a talented kid that will play in the NFL but I suspect he is more of a journeyman backup level player.

I keep seeing the hype on Malik Willis too, who is another guy I think is a very unimpressive prospect.

This is just a bad, bad QB class.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

https://thedraftnetwork.com/articles/sam-howell-2022-nfl-draft-stock-mid-season-tdn100

 

Oline or not he is at best an average athlete with average size with an average arm.   Locks onto his wideouts and gets happy feet in the pocket.  He did this last season with a good oline.  He does throw a nice deep ball but I pray to God Darnold turns it around and we dont hitch our wagon to this.   Like kungfo says someone will probably fall in love with him in the top 10 but he is nowhere near worthy.

 

Where would he fit in this past years draft?   Probably after Mac Jones.  Thats telling. 

Average arm. AVERAGE ARM.

LOLOLOL!!!!!

Straight clown show bias.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

The crazy thing is the OL is the same. They did play really well last year and they've been trash this year. Turns out, they were just floated by having two NFL RBs. Take away those two drafted RBs and two drafted WRs and they get exposed while Howell and Josh Downs perform heroics to carry the offense.

Oh that's right they did have two sick RBs. But I also do remember the WRs doin thangs.

3 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Yeah, I think he is a talented kid that will play in the NFL but I suspect he is more of a journeyman backup level player.

I keep seeing the hype on Malik Willis too, who is another guy I think is a very unimpressive prospect.

This is just a bad, bad QB class.

Now they are talking about Malik #1 overall I think. Someone gonna get paid for this being a bad class though as teams are going to overreach now since the Mahommes, Watson, Jackson, Herbert stuff. No one is going to want to be the team that missed out so there will be some reaches going forward as tends to happen in these cycles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Fox007 said:

Oh that's right they did have two sick RBs. But I also do remember the WRs doin thangs.

Now they are talking about Malik #1 overall I think. Someone gonna get paid for this being a bad class though as teams are going to overreach now since the Mahommes, Watson, Jackson, Herbert stuff. No one is going to want to be the team that missed out so there will be some reaches going forward as tends to happen in these cycles.

I suspect this is gonna be one of those years where QB prospects drop down the draft. Might only see one in the top 10 and 2 in the first round.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Average arm. AVERAGE ARM.

LOLOLOL!!!!!

Straight clown show bias.

gif-18.gif

In this one he just kinda flicks it 35 yards in air without even stepping into it

deep_ball.gif

This one is in the air 45 yards and looks pretty effortless. I don't know squirt about the guy but from the small sample size his arm doesn't look weak

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Yeah, I think he is a talented kid that will play in the NFL but I suspect he is more of a journeyman backup level player.

I keep seeing the hype on Malik Willis too, who is another guy I think is a very unimpressive prospect.

This is just a bad, bad QB class.

I like Howell more than willis but that aint saying much.  The only game I have seen of Corral was against bama and he looked okay but not really sure what his forte is.  He is a bit small but doesnt run a bunch, not overly accurate, not really seeing how he is moving into the top 10.

 

But overall we picked a bad year to be drafting a qb in the first.  Seems to be a good/great year for Tackles and interior lineman

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Average arm. AVERAGE ARM.

LOLOLOL!!!!!

Straight clown show bias.

How is that bias?  I dont pull for him or against him I just watch the games. And I am certainly not the poster with him as my avatar.  

 

Look up every scouting report on him and they say the same.   His arm is average and he gets happy feet and holds the ball too long when under pressure. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, mrcompletely11 said:

I like Howell more than willis but that aint saying much.  The only game I have seen of Corral was against bama and he looked okay but not really sure what his forte is.  He is a bit small but doesnt run a bunch, not overly accurate, not really seeing how he is moving into the top 10.

 

But overall we picked a bad year to be drafting a qb in the first.  Seems to be a good/great year for Tackles and interior lineman

I 100% don't get the hype on Corral. Everything about him screams college level player that won't translate well in the NFL. Very average skill sets.

I hope we take take best OL available in the first or maybe trade down into the second and grab another 2nd/3rd so we can take snag 2-3 OL.

I wouldn't be upset at all with our first ever OL only draft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://www.si.com/nfl/draft/nfl-draft/film-dont-lie-sam-howell-is-a-good-qb-but-a-limited-one

 

Oh wait, here is a report from SI discussing his average arm strength and tendency to hold the ball too long because he locks unto a wr. 

 

He may turn into an all world qb but I would prefer one that is a bit bigger and more athletic for starters.

 

 

Edited by mrcompletely11
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

I wouldn't be upset at all with our first ever OL only draft.

I wouldn't hate it. Got young talent all over the D no worries there just resign Reddick

Young offense and just resign DJ Moore and there it really is for the must haves. IF we can work in DJackson then w/e if not we clearly have DBs for days now so not as must have as it used to be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Fox007 said:

I wouldn't hate it. Got young talent all over the D no worries there just resign Reddick

Young offense and just resign DJ Moore and there it really is for the must haves. IF we can work in DJackson then w/e if not we clearly have DBs for days now so not as must have as it used to be.

I just hope we dont trade down in the first or out all together trying to accumulate lost picks.  Especially if there is a highly rated LT there.   I suspect this will not be the case because the qb class is so weak few teams are going to want to move up.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, mrcompletely11 said:

I just hope we dont trade down in the first or out all together trying to accumulate lost picks.  Especially if there is a highly rated LT there.   I suspect this will not be the case because the qb class is so weak few teams are going to want to move up.

Right depending on where we draft will help dictate that because later in the 1st round is where the great centers usually go and even 2nd round but since we don't have a 2nd I'm good with a C there. If we are picking top 10 b/c the bottom keeps falling out then LT option may be on the table. Just gotta get the best OL for the spot we're picking

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

https://www.si.com/nfl/draft/nfl-draft/film-dont-lie-sam-howell-is-a-good-qb-but-a-limited-one

 

Oh wait, here is a report from SI discussing his average arm strength and tendency to hold the ball too long because he locks unto a wr. 

 

He may turn into an all world qb but I would prefer one that is a bit bigger and more athletic for starters.

 

 

Yeah, that is why you see comparisons to Baker or McCoy. He isn't noodle armed at all but he has average NFL arm strength. 

The biggest concern is his myriad of mechanical issues and that offense UNC runs. He seems Ike a guy that could use a year or two on the bench getting that all fixed. 

Also, he has traditionally struggled pretty badly against pressure so this is about the worst scenario possible for him. He seems more like a prospect for a team with an aging, competent veteran in place.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

I just hope we dont trade down in the first or out all together trying to accumulate lost picks.  Especially if there is a highly rated LT there.   I suspect this will not be the case because the qb class is so weak few teams are going to want to move up.

I'm okay trading down if we can snag some extra 2nd and 3rd rounders to use on OL. But, if there is clearly an elite OT or IOL available, don't fug that up and take the kid. Even just adding one more solid player on the OL would be a massive improvement.

If we can add just TWO more above average OL in the offseason, I think we can see huge improvements

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Posts

    • Sure it does, maybe not every position and not every draft.  You have to admit the hit rate goes down the further in the draft you get.  Would you more readily find a generational talent at the #2 pick or #19 pick?  High picks are considered "busts" if they doesn't pan out, whereas guys drafted later don't have that level of scrutiny upon them.  Different expectation levels.  If Styles does indeed go #2, I already listed the rarefied air that he would be in.  Maybe he doesn't set the League on fire, but my gut feeling is he does.  Again, you don't take an off-ball LB #2 if he is just a 'really good' player.
    • To illustrate my point, I watched (and commented on the Huddle) that Rozeboom would often wait a full second (or close to it) before taking his first step.  I assume that he probably had issues with false steps, a faulty practice that can take an ILB out of the gap completely.  Watch Luke and you see a step with the snap, and rarely was it a false step.  Rozeboom may have had 100 tackles (speculating) but initial contact was 2-3 yards on the defensive side of the ball.  Luke's 100 tackles were made 1-2 yards from the LOS.  Over the course of a year, Luke was much more productive (more fumbles, fewer long gainers, more OL penalties, fewer first downs, etc) that Rozeboom, but on the stat sheet, they both had 100 tackles.  In fact, Rozeboom's inefficiency kept him on the field more (more first downs, fewer OL penalties, turnovers, and punts) so he should have MORE tackles.   I would like to see stats that break down those things.   For example again, Josh Norman was slow--4.68 or so at CB.  However, his anticipation speed was incredible.  He made as many plays as a 4.4 CB.  I had one coach (college--later became the head coach at WCU) tell me that slower players have to use their brains more to still be around.  Elite athletes can just get by on their physical superiority.  He added, "Rarely does a football player run full speed.  Most of the time, they are not, so the 40 time is misleading stat.  Smart players overcome shortcomings--when the elite athlete becomes average (slows with age, advances in level of competition) they struggle against smarter (football IQ) competition.  
    • Obviously tongue in cheek hyperbole. But we do not need a first round RB to compete for a championship. We need intelligent roster building. That to me is the complete opposite of intelligent roster building because it is a prime resource at a devalued plug and play position when we have needs across the defense.
×
×
  • Create New...