Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Sam in our system in this team right now


musicman
 Share

Recommended Posts

26 minutes ago, iamhubby1 said:

 

So, because you weren't part of that crowd it didn't exist? You twisted the twist. That is tough work.

No, you were implying the huddle was overeacting and changing course to quick on Sam.   I was reminding you that everyone doesn't fall into that narrative. 

Sam Darnold has been Sam Darnold his entire QB career.  Same flawed QB essentially from USC to Carolina.  

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, CRA said:

No, you were implying the huddle was overeacting and changing course to quick on Sam.   I was reminding you that everyone doesn't fall into that narrative. 

Sam Darnold has been Sam Darnold his entire QB career.  Sam flawed QB essentially from USC to Carolina.  

 

Dang dude. I said. "We started 3-0 and folks were happy. Then we lost 4 in a row, and here we are". I never said overreacting. That's you putting words in my mouth.

 

I  get it. You don't like Sam. And I say, it is still too early for that. And you have a problem with that.

 

I also said; Agree to disagree. But that wasn't listened to either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, iamhubby1 said:

 

Dang dude. I said. "We started 3-0 and folks were happy. Then we lost 4 in a row, and here we are". I never said overreacting. That's you putting words in my mouth.

 

I  get it. You don't like Sam. And I say, it is still too early for that. And you have a problem with that.

 

I also said; Agree to disagree. But that wasn't listened to either.

"There was happiness. A few losses later. This place is up in arms." 

You literally didn't type it out.  You implied it. 

You can think anything you want.  But if you post your opinion on something, you should be able to handle that a certain percetnage will agree and disagree.   You can think Clausen was owed a second season.  You post it here, people will respond with their own opinion of the statement.   That is one of the primary funcitons of the message board. 

Sam is very likeable.   He has proven for 4 straight seasons he isn't a starting QB though.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CRA said:

"There was happiness. A few losses later. This place is up in arms." 

You literally didn't type it out.  You implied it. 

You can think anything you want.  But if you post your opinion on something, you should be able to handle that a certain percetnage will agree and disagree.   You can think Clausen was owed a second season.  You post it here, people will respond with their own opinion of the statement.   That is one of the primary funcitons of the message board. 

Sam is very likeable.   He has proven for 4 straight seasons he isn't a starting QB though.  

 

You keep quoting me like you are going to use some Jedi mind trick and I'll all of a sudden agree with you? It is not going to happen. I am not in "Burn it down mode" like so many Huddlers.

 

I've seen this Offense work. I'll wait this year out, and see where it goes before I jump off that cliff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, frankw said:

I appreciate your Trading Places reference but my goodness can we please stop with this. Sam Darnold is playing the same way he has going all the way back to USC.

 

The 11-3 Trojans, who ended up ranked 12th overall? That was Sam's last year at SC. Or going back further to 2016, where they were 10-3 and won the Rose Bowl over Penn? I wish he had the same connection he had with his team (and fans) then, than he has here. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Ghostface Chilla said:

 

The 11-3 Trojans, who ended up ranked 12th overall? That was Sam's last year at SC. Or going back further to 2016, where they were 10-3 and won the Rose Bowl over Penn? I wish he had the same connection he had with his team (and fans) then, than he has here. 

 

 

For a team game like football, the QB get more credit, or blame than they  usually deserve. But that's football.

 

As for how he is treated here? I have no answer, or at least not one I'm willing to say out loud. You don't temp fate with the "Candy Man" mystique 

 

 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Ghostface Chilla said:

 

The 11-3 Trojans, who ended up ranked 12th overall? That was Sam's last year at SC. Or going back further to 2016, where they were 10-3 and won the Rose Bowl over Penn? I wish he had the same connection he had with his team (and fans) then, than he has here. 

 

24 starts at USC - 22 INTs, 21 fumbles 

Almost a guarantee he would throw a pick and put the ball on the ground every time he took the field.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Snake said:

Sam would probably play better than Dak. People have always trashed the QB here but never trashed the Coordinators or coaching. Somehow it's always the QBs fault. What legit coaching staff goes into a season with backups at every position on the offensive line but one? Then what coaching staff bring a project QB with zero back up plan into a season? I said well maybe they know something I don't. Well I guess they don't. 

Sam's a better Qb than Dak but the Panthers are holding him back. 

Yep think I've heard it all at this point. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, Ghostface Chilla said:

 

The 11-3 Trojans, who ended up ranked 12th overall? That was Sam's last year at SC. Or going back further to 2016, where they were 10-3 and won the Rose Bowl over Penn? I wish he had the same connection he had with his team (and fans) then, than he has here. 

 

He's always been turnover prone. He had 36 in 27 games at USC. That has clearly followed him to the nfl unfortunately and it is biting us here now. The connection to the fans isn't the issue taking care of the ball is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah, I could jump right into the unbelievable Bryce debate now that some people are trying to flip the script because Bryce Young has, at most, a handful of decent games as a pro, but that's going to work itself out. Suffice it to say that I've seen better QBs (with an s) in a Panthers uniform, and I've certainly seen better QBs be drafted while we're playing around with Bryce, one of them who beat the crap out of us already this season... Let's forget about Bryce (and his markedly underwhelming play since he's been here); I think that most sane fans will agree that drafting him was an error, but it happens. Sure, it doesn't happen to the tune of King's ransom---including your main receiver---but it happens. You bet, you lose. Speaking of receivers...and betting and losing... Oh, man, we drafted Xavier Legette. Yes, just like with Bryce, I've entered "the dark side." Some Huddlers were telling us from the beginning, and they were right. But, I'm not apologizing for waiting to see what a guy's got before making my decision on him. X was a one-year wonder at South Carolina who parlayed some really nice production that season, a great personality and thick country accent, into becoming a first round pick (but only in Carolina). For Dan Morgan and company, He was a big swing that has turned into a big whiff (and I can still feel the ill breeze from that one). Sh¡t happens, right? Well, not so fast. Ladd McConkey was the decidedly more polished receiver who was literally ready to hit the ground running as soon as stepping onto the field as a pro. Ladd was never the biggest guy (though not the smallest), but he was the guy that could run routes, always seemed to get open---no question---and had the same speed as X, but with legit quickness and nuanced shake and bake. But Dan chose the project. He chose the guy where the game speed looks more like a tractor trailer than a 5.0 mustang. Look, I've supported X (just like Bryce) many many a day, but no more. Now I'm not saying that I won't root for the guy. Just like with Bryce, he seems like a great kid. But as far as giving excuses for the kid, and, perhaps more importantly, waiting for some miraculous breakout, I'm done with that. I've seen enough. You don't draft a project for a project. And yes, Bryce had proven to be a project after his first season. In my mind, drafting a supposedly number one receiver that needs lots of development for a starting quarterback that needs immediate help to try and further his development is not going to lead to good things. Pick the surest guy. Or at least pick the one who appears to be the surest guy, because picking can be tricky... especially when you're too busy tricking yourself. 
    • Winning ain't gonna make my eyes lie to me. Context matters, and it will always matter in the game of football.
    • That TD pass to Legette against Miami. Elite. The play where Bryce rolls right to buy time until Tet can reverse field.  Bryce pumps as multiple defenders close in.  He barely gets it away before he takes a big time hit.  Beautiful off platform throw and great catch by Tet.   The second TD to Tet against Dallas where Bryce dips and turns his shoulder in to evade the pass rusher.  Resets and finds Tet in the end zone. Dude embodies the Keep Pounding mantra.  
×
×
  • Create New...