Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Is Silver Platter Sam a viable backup QB for Panthers over the long term?


SizzleBuzz
 Share

Is Silver Platter Sam a viable backup QB for Panthers over the long term?  

57 members have voted

  1. 1. What say ye?

    • No.
      40
    • Yes.
      17


Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, SCO96 said:

Teddy was signed for 3 seasons I believe. That contract was perfect in length because it would give you time to see if Teddy was the guy, or draft a successor if he wasn't.

Imagine if we had kept Teddy this season and not traded down in the draft. We would have had our choice of 6 left tackles and/or 3 interior lineman, including Creed Humphrey (the best center in the draft). It's very possible we could have easily walked away with 2 starters on the O-line  from the 2nd and 3rd rounds. 

Having another year in the system and a "healthier" CMC would have helped Teddy's performance. By year 3 I think we could have been a legitimate playoff threat with solid depth on both sides of the ball. 

Yep. It buys you time to build and find not only a QB but an OL. Teddy can make up for some of their deficiencies(and he did) but Darnold amplifies them. 

They got greedy and thought they were gonna win now. Guess who that sounds a lot like? Marty Hurney.

2 hours ago, Catsfan69 said:

If we are starting over at QB get someone at least  Steve Berlin level. 

Then draft one.

But Sam's going to be the Starter next year don't you think?

If they draft a guy he sits behind Sam.

Sam will likely never start another game here again. That experiment is so over that it should be a fireable offense to even out him in the game other than as a backup after the starter got injured. 

I think the staff also realizes that he will not play here anymore either. That's why they keep dumbing down the offense and trying to keep the ball out of his hands.

1 hour ago, AU-panther said:

 

So you are content with us being average for years to come.  We get a journeyman QB, make the rest of the team strong and we can go 9-8.  Maybe one year we win a few close games and go 11-6 and get in the playoffs and probably lose.  

Cleveland wasn't bad because they overdrafted QBs.  They were bad because they didn't draft QBs well.  They had a good line, one of the best LTs of all time, and it still didn't' matter.

Also teams don't for the most part don't maintain a level of winning.  Most teams have good yeasr and bad years.  

This isn't about tearing the team to the ground but instead finding a QB.  The teams that consistatnly win are those that have the best QB play.

You are overstating players wanting to leave, most players go where the dollars go, even if a few leave it doesn't matter if you find a QB.

An elite QB is worth more wins to your team then a hand full of any other players.  Its not even just about positional value, its also about avaiilbity.  I can replace a safety or WR in free agency.  Even if want to spend the money on a QB in free agency there is a very good chance you can't find one.

I'm not talking about spending a 1st round pick every year, since Cam how many QBs have we drafted in the 1st round? 2nd round?

I guess you and I just have different goals for the team.

You keep intersecting meaning in what I am saying. Point out where I said I am content being average "for years to come?" This is the same as me saying your point is that we need to be terrible for decades to get a QB in the draft. Neither of those is true so you need to stop interjecting the argument to want to argue against and just accept what I am saying in the literal sense.

That's why I am pointing out the dangers of doing what you are talking about. I am not making definitive statements about it. Maybe we stink for a year or two and end up with the next Peyton Manning. Or maybe we stink for 15-20 years trying to find the next Peyton Manning. That's what I am saying, the teams that are constantly drafting high typically stay in those cycles for a long time. The reason being exactly what I am talking about. Mismanagement, poor evalutions, panic drafting and poor coaching. Any or all of those can keep you in a rut for decades.

Sure, most teams don't maintain a lengthy period of high level of competitiveness, that is absolutely true. But would you rather be the Pats, Chiefs, Packers, Colts, Seahawks, Steelers or do you want to be the Falcons, Texans, Vikings, etc. Do you just want to be able to randomly put together a few great seasons or be in contention for the long haul? I thought that was literally the point of this rebuild. The former teams that I mentioned have rarely experienced "bad" seasons. They have mostly been average to elite. That isn't my accident.

I would never in a million years argue against the value of an elite QB. Never. In fact I am on record here as repeatedly saying that it is the most important piece of a successful modern NFL team. By a wide margin. But, this acknowledgement doesn't mean that I want us to just draft a top 5 QB of every draft class. Look back 20 years and you are gonna find some amazing years for that and then a lot of really awful years for that. 

That's basically my entire point and why I keep beating on the evaluation and not reaching. If you don't believe he IS The Guy, then don't waste valuable draft capital on a guy that MIGHT be The Guy. 

After all, that is basically how we ended up with Sam Darnold. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

Yep. It buys you time to build and find not only a QB but an OL. Teddy can make up for some of their deficiencies(and he did) but Darnold amplifies them. 

They got greedy and thought they were gonna win now. Guess who that sounds a lot like? Marty Hurney.

Sam will likely never start another game here again. That experiment is so over that it should be a fireable offense to even out him in the game other than as a backup after the starter got injured. 

I think the staff also realizes that he will not play here anymore either. That's why they keep dumbing down the offense and trying to keep the ball out of his hands.

You keep intersecting meaning in what I am saying. Point out where I said I am content being average "for years to come?" This is the same as me saying your point is that we need to be terrible for decades to get a QB in the draft. Neither of those is true so you need to stop interjecting the argument to want to argue against and just accept what I am saying in the literal sense.

That's why I am pointing out the dangers of doing what you are talking about. I am not making definitive statements about it. Maybe we stink for a year or two and end up with the next Peyton Manning. Or maybe we stink for 15-20 years trying to find the next Peyton Manning. That's what I am saying, the teams that are constantly drafting high typically stay in those cycles for a long time. The reason being exactly what I am talking about. Mismanagement, poor evalutions, panic drafting and poor coaching. Any or all of those can keep you in a rut for decades.

Sure, most teams don't maintain a lengthy period of high level of competitiveness, that is absolutely true. But would you rather be the Pats, Chiefs, Packers, Colts, Seahawks, Steelers or do you want to be the Falcons, Texans, Vikings, etc. Do you just want to be able to randomly put together a few great seasons or be in contention for the long haul? I thought that was literally the point of this rebuild. The former teams that I mentioned have rarely experienced "bad" seasons. They have mostly been average to elite. That isn't my accident.

I would never in a million years argue against the value of an elite QB. Never. In fact I am on record here as repeatedly saying that it is the most important piece of a successful modern NFL team. By a wide margin. But, this acknowledgement doesn't mean that I want us to just draft a top 5 QB of every draft class. Look back 20 years and you are gonna find some amazing years for that and then a lot of really awful years for that. 

That's basically my entire point and why I keep beating on the evaluation and not reaching. If you don't believe he IS The Guy, then don't waste valuable draft capital on a guy that MIGHT be The Guy. 

After all, that is basically how we ended up with Sam Darnold. 

Pats, Chiefs, Packers, Colts, Seashawks, Steelers were all pretty much built on QBs that they drafted.  They were consistently good because of the QB.  The league is full of good rosters with bad QBs that consistently are average to below average teams.

You keep on with drafting a guy that you believe IS the guy.  Outside of the rare time you have the 1st overall pick and manning or Luck is there that doesn't happen.

People thought Rodgers MIGHT be the guy, that is why he fell.

People thought Mahomes MIGHT be the guy, that is why he fell.  He was the 3rd QB in a class that had Trubisky at the top.  

Nobody even thought Brady MIGHT be the guy.

Pretty much nobody thought Wilson MIGHT be the guy.

Everybody did think Manning IS the guy, hence the reason he went #1.

We actually ended up with Sam Darnold because we were scared to draft someone who MIGHT be the guy because we only wanted to draft a guy that we knew IS the guy.

My only point is if you wait for the guy you are 100% sure about it will probably never happen.

Here again, agree to disagree, I like most of your post and we agree on a lot and both saw this coming.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, AU-panther said:

Pats, Chiefs, Packers, Colts, Seashawks, Steelers were all pretty much built on QBs that they drafted.  They were consistently good because of the QB.  The league is full of good rosters with bad QBs that consistently are average to below average teams.

You keep on with drafting a guy that you believe IS the guy.  Outside of the rare time you have the 1st overall pick and manning or Luck is there that doesn't happen.

People thought Rodgers MIGHT be the guy, that is why he fell.

People thought Mahomes MIGHT be the guy, that is why he fell.  He was the 3rd QB in a class that had Trubisky at the top.  

Nobody even thought Brady MIGHT be the guy.

Pretty much nobody thought Wilson MIGHT be the guy.

Everybody did think Manning IS the guy, hence the reason he went #1.

We actually ended up with Sam Darnold because we were scared to draft someone who MIGHT be the guy because we only wanted to draft a guy that we knew IS the guy.

My only point is if you wait for the guy you are 100% sure about it will probably never happen.

Here again, agree to disagree, I like most of your post and we agree on a lot and both saw this coming.

 

Yeah, I think there are levels of it. I am not talking about absolute certainty. I just mean someone you truly believe is going to be the answer. If you don't believe that, don't take him. If you don't have a first round grade on him, don't take him in the 1st. 

That kind of poo. That is really where we differ. I am not talking sure thing, I mean someone you BELIEVE in.

Which, we have to be careful that Rhule doesn't talk himself into a bum. It has happened twice already.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Yeah, I think there are levels of it. I am not talking about absolute certainty. I just mean someone you truly believe is going to be the answer. If you don't believe that, don't take him. If you don't have a first round grade on him, don't take him in the 1st. 

That kind of poo. That is really where we differ. I am not talking sure thing, I mean someone you BELIEVE in.

Which, we have to be careful that Rhule doesn't talk himself into a bum. It has happened twice already.

We might have backed ourselves into a corner, I could really see it happening, and like you I don't want to invest in a bum. 

People just need to realize that QBs aren't even money bets.  They are always a worse gamble than other positions but the payoff is a so much higher, and frankly its a payoff that you pretty much have to have to be an upper tier team.

Gambling on a QB in 2021 on paper made more sense in 2022.  I really don't know what kind of class is coming in 2023.  That might be the wise move, I just seriously doubt anyone has the patience for that.

I think this season is so much more frustrating for fans because a lot of us saw this coming.

 

 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, AU-panther said:

We might have backed ourselves into a corner, I could really see it happening, and like you I don't want to invest in a bum. 

People just need to realize that QBs aren't even money bets.  They are always a worse gamble than other positions but the payoff is a so much higher, and frankly its a payoff that you pretty much have to have to be an upper tier team.

Gambling on a QB in 2021 on paper made more sense in 2022.  I really don't know what kind of class is coming in 2023.  That might be the wise move, I just seriously doubt anyone has the patience for that.

I think this season is so much more frustrating for fans because a lot of us saw this coming.

 

 

Yeah, this was largely predictable. That does make it so much more upsetting to see it go the way we thought it was going to go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It all sounds great. The only unknowns are injuries and how they will need to be addressed. Horn has a history as does the newly added Jaelen Phillips and Cooker has yet to play an entire season as well. And then there are the Ikey's - totally unexpecteded injuries that put a major wrench in your plans. I do think its a great plan though.
    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
×
×
  • Create New...