Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Is sherrod marting the best FS?


Mr ocho nueve

Recommended Posts

After watching him play vs Miami, I'm calling for Godfrey to remain the starter..It can't get anyworse than that for a FS. I give Martin credit he is a dam good defensive player, but he acts like he doesn't want to hit anyone. His pursuit angles, tackle attempts, man.......we need a new FS.

Of course I meant Martin in the thread title

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's also hard to evaluate the secondary with the piss-poor defensive line play we had last night. We had virtually no pressure against a makeshift offensive line.

this

martin looked bad on the 50 yard ricky williams run, but that's not an easy tackle for a lot of starting free safeties in the nfl. on one play martin went lower than williams and tackled him.

but, imo, defensive line was so bad in run defense and pass rush, secondary didn't get any help

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But that did not stop people from saying Godfrey was garbage:D

Not to brag, but I was saying it after Martin's first game against Arizona. His solid game against the Saints and Falcons convinced me that he was no one-hit wonder.

But I did think the same thing. Our pass rush and defense as a whole looked stellar against Arizona, and I didn't want to crown Martin before his time. Still, I think in his four games as a starter he's proven himself worthy of the position.

I really didn't think his tackling looked that bad at all last game. Our defense as a whole has a habit of overpursuing, and not many of the defensive players had a good game the other night. I saw Beason miss several tackles, but nobody in their right mind would call him out.

It was a bad game, but certainly not representative of Martin's work thus far. Let's give him the benefit of the doubt and see how he plays next week and in the weeks to come.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

but he acts like he doesn't want to hit anyone.

That sound kinda like Godfrey there. :P

But Godfrey should play the other position he better at, while we keep Martin at where he is right now. He got more INT. in a season than Godfrey has so far with us.

Of course I meant Martin in the thread title

You sure? ;):D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I saw Beason miss several tackles, but nobody in their right mind would call him out.

I noticed that too.

It was a bad game, but certainly not representative of Martin's work thus far. Let's give him the benefit of the doubt and see how he plays next week and in the weeks to come.

Agreed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I mean really, I don't like either one of them right now, lets see dante wesley start and knock someone out

You're saying that based on his propensity for nailing the crap out of opposing defenders, and, I would guess, you're most smitten with the idea as a result of that controversial hit he laid in the Tampa Bay game.

If Wesley was a bonafide candidate for the safety position, Fox would have started him by now. Not to mention, we've already got one guy in the secondary who can lay the wood, sometimes at the expensive of pass coverage or wrapping up a tackle.

Martin has looked better in coverage than any safety here since Minter. Let's give him a shot to do something, and not knock him for one bad game (and was his game significantly worse than the defense as a whole -- I submit to you that it was not).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

martin is the best candidate for FS and it isn't even close.

btw...that big run that ricky made? where was beason? he had a hand on him and wiiliams ran right by him. that TD catch that ricky made? beason was there and actually had ricky wrapped up and let him get loose.

should we bench beason? no.

for the record, martin is a lot more eager to hit and tackle than godfrey. he's a whole lot more aggressive.

no way should we go back to godfrey as FS.

i'm not sure what godfrey should do but he shouldn't have that starting job back.

martin is just flat out better than godfrey at FS. probably makes sense since martin has been playing safety for longer and, despite him being a rookie, is more mature. martin's a year older than godfrey. i trust his instincts more at his natural position.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the whole defense was bad thursday night.

no one gets a pass.

how do you leave that QB of theirs upright with that m.a.s.h. unit of a OL the dolphins were running with.

piss poor playing and coaching on defense all night. they all sucked. beason among them. i'm probably more pissed at him just because i have him at a higher standard.

so your buddy isn't beside you anymore.....get over it and act like a leader. get this team to play better. get you head and their heads back in the game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • LOL... Yet again proving you can't look below anything than what you see on the surface Mock drafts ARE NOT draft grades They are what people think will happen.  They are mocking teams taking QB's in the top 5 of the draft because that's just historically how drafts go regardless of the grades on the QBs.  Almost every draft expert, even those mocking QB's going high, have said time and time again that none of these QB's actually grade out as those type of picks. This is again, where I say you don't like to actually read what I have to say, because I already explained it. 2022 the exact same thing happened, mock drafts had guys like Pickett and Willis going in the Top 5 because that's just what teams usually do, but GM's listened to their prospect grades and knew they weren't worth taking that high, so they didn't. It's not to say QB's won't go that high this year, but it's to say that they aren't graded out as elite QB prospects.  Mock drafts 
    • Have you seen the mock drafts lately?   Most of them have us taking a QB. Just because you aren't high on these QBs doesn't mean the Panthers or other teams aren't.   If you want me to be real I just think you a Tmac homer and all you care about is us drafting him. It's why you get so defensive when people mention other prospects.   Be open to other people's ideas. Nobody in this thread is saying anything bad about your boy Tmac. 
    • Oh good lord Interest doesn't mean interest in making a bad trade to take the player, that's why I had such a long post, to accurately describe why those are two different things, but you don't like to listen to that stuff.  Being interested in a player doesn't live in a vacuum. It's very simple... there isn't a #1 draft pick type of grade on any of these QB's, if there was, we'd just take them.  You can't bluff a pick everyone knows you won't make, and trying to trade the pick is the CLEAR signal that you're not taking the QB. Just because the Raiders would have interest, doesn't mean they're going to bail us out of a situation we don't want to be in, they'd be smart about it and just sit put, let us take a non QB as we'd be telling the world we're not taking one just by trying to trade the pick, and then they'd take him at #2 (either with their own pick or by trading less to get that one). Oh, and your point of "if nobody is willing to make the trade, you obviously just take the best QB" is quite literally the dumbest thing I've ever read on here. If nobody is willing to trade up to take the QB, then it's OBVIOUS that the QB isn't worth taking with that pick, so OBVIOUSLY taking the best QB there is just OBVIOUSLY stupid and a bad pick. The moral of it is if there is a QB worth taking, we're taking them and not making the trade.  If there isn't a QB worth taking there, nobody is trading up to #1 to take one, we just showed the NFL how bad of an idea that is 2 years ago, it's really not hard to see. You keep making up this mythical situation where there is a QB who has shown to be worth trading up to #1 for and we'll be able to leverage that into a trade.  But we're the most QB needy team in the league, if we end up with the #1 pick, either we are taking a QB #1 or no QB is going #1 unless we get VERY lucky and two teams in the Top 5 fall in love with one prospect and we can play them off each other and fleece one of them. But again, I can't see that happening, as if there was a QB worthy of that, we're just taking him ourselves.
×
×
  • Create New...