Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Is sherrod marting the best FS?


Mr ocho nueve

Recommended Posts

After watching him play vs Miami, I'm calling for Godfrey to remain the starter..It can't get anyworse than that for a FS. I give Martin credit he is a dam good defensive player, but he acts like he doesn't want to hit anyone. His pursuit angles, tackle attempts, man.......we need a new FS.

Of course I meant Martin in the thread title

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's also hard to evaluate the secondary with the piss-poor defensive line play we had last night. We had virtually no pressure against a makeshift offensive line.

this

martin looked bad on the 50 yard ricky williams run, but that's not an easy tackle for a lot of starting free safeties in the nfl. on one play martin went lower than williams and tackled him.

but, imo, defensive line was so bad in run defense and pass rush, secondary didn't get any help

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But that did not stop people from saying Godfrey was garbage:D

Not to brag, but I was saying it after Martin's first game against Arizona. His solid game against the Saints and Falcons convinced me that he was no one-hit wonder.

But I did think the same thing. Our pass rush and defense as a whole looked stellar against Arizona, and I didn't want to crown Martin before his time. Still, I think in his four games as a starter he's proven himself worthy of the position.

I really didn't think his tackling looked that bad at all last game. Our defense as a whole has a habit of overpursuing, and not many of the defensive players had a good game the other night. I saw Beason miss several tackles, but nobody in their right mind would call him out.

It was a bad game, but certainly not representative of Martin's work thus far. Let's give him the benefit of the doubt and see how he plays next week and in the weeks to come.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

but he acts like he doesn't want to hit anyone.

That sound kinda like Godfrey there. :P

But Godfrey should play the other position he better at, while we keep Martin at where he is right now. He got more INT. in a season than Godfrey has so far with us.

Of course I meant Martin in the thread title

You sure? ;):D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I saw Beason miss several tackles, but nobody in their right mind would call him out.

I noticed that too.

It was a bad game, but certainly not representative of Martin's work thus far. Let's give him the benefit of the doubt and see how he plays next week and in the weeks to come.

Agreed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I mean really, I don't like either one of them right now, lets see dante wesley start and knock someone out

You're saying that based on his propensity for nailing the crap out of opposing defenders, and, I would guess, you're most smitten with the idea as a result of that controversial hit he laid in the Tampa Bay game.

If Wesley was a bonafide candidate for the safety position, Fox would have started him by now. Not to mention, we've already got one guy in the secondary who can lay the wood, sometimes at the expensive of pass coverage or wrapping up a tackle.

Martin has looked better in coverage than any safety here since Minter. Let's give him a shot to do something, and not knock him for one bad game (and was his game significantly worse than the defense as a whole -- I submit to you that it was not).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

martin is the best candidate for FS and it isn't even close.

btw...that big run that ricky made? where was beason? he had a hand on him and wiiliams ran right by him. that TD catch that ricky made? beason was there and actually had ricky wrapped up and let him get loose.

should we bench beason? no.

for the record, martin is a lot more eager to hit and tackle than godfrey. he's a whole lot more aggressive.

no way should we go back to godfrey as FS.

i'm not sure what godfrey should do but he shouldn't have that starting job back.

martin is just flat out better than godfrey at FS. probably makes sense since martin has been playing safety for longer and, despite him being a rookie, is more mature. martin's a year older than godfrey. i trust his instincts more at his natural position.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the whole defense was bad thursday night.

no one gets a pass.

how do you leave that QB of theirs upright with that m.a.s.h. unit of a OL the dolphins were running with.

piss poor playing and coaching on defense all night. they all sucked. beason among them. i'm probably more pissed at him just because i have him at a higher standard.

so your buddy isn't beside you anymore.....get over it and act like a leader. get this team to play better. get you head and their heads back in the game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • https://www.yahoo.com/sports/article/versatile-2nd-db-named-panthers-154026075.html Smith-Wade's ability to play corner, nickel and safety makes him valuable to a young defense trying to rebuild after finishing last in the NFL a year ago. "Chau took advantage of an opportunity,'' coach Dave Canales said. "He made tackles. He had an opportunity on an interception, and he made it.'' Our defense has got to come alive for us to have a chance of winning our Division!
    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
×
×
  • Create New...