Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Heinike


Paa Langfart
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, WOW!! said:

Sam situation totally agree with..

But Players not playing up to the standards they have most of the season.. Is not...

Especially when I can see Easily.. They were in position to make those plays...

Which is what happened today...

It was pretty clear fairly early that WFT's passing plan was pretty much "find #26 and throw to his guy". We should've yanked Dante at halftime. This is the second time in three weeks Rhule has failed to make an obvious depth chart move. Sam should've been yanked at halftime vs. the Pats, but Rhule wanted to give him a chance to "play through it". This is professional football. It's not about not hurting feelings. Do your job or we'll put in someone else and give them an opportunity. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

It was pretty clear fairly early that WFT's passing plan was pretty much "find #26 and throw to his guy". We should've yanked Dante at halftime. This is the second time in three weeks Rhule has failed to make an obvious depth chart move. Sam should've been yanked at halftime vs. the Pats, but Rhule wanted to give him a chance to "play through it". This is professional football. It's not about not hurting feelings. Do your job or we'll put in someone else and give them an opportunity. 

Yank a guy who is having his best season and playing dam near a pro bowl level after 1 bad half of play???

Okay you got it... Smh!! 

Name me a coach that is doing that??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

Yank a guy who is having his best season and playing dam near a pro bowl level after 1 bad half of play???

Okay you got it... Smh!! 

Name me a coach that is doing that??

It's not about the season, it's about today. What are you doing today?

Name a coach? Bill Belichick benched #1 CB Malcolm Butler in the SUPER BOWL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

Yank a guy who is having his best season and playing dam near a pro bowl level after 1 bad half of play???

Okay you got it... Smh!! 

Name me a coach that is doing that??

I get what you are saying and to a point you are right. Most coaches wouldn’t yank their CB1, but with the way he was playing you certainly have to try and mask his deficiencies… for example, move him to the slot.

If you are loyal to a T then you’ll find yourself unemployed very quickly in professional sports. Unfortunately for Rhule, he hasn’t figured out how to walk the line.

Whether it’s straight up lying about “how excited” he was to work with Cam or his inability to find a spot on the field for Jackson (other than opposite of McLaurin), he still has a lot to learn about how to handle tough situations.

Edited by MillionDollarCam
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, MillionDollarCam said:

I get what you are saying and to a point you are right. Most coaches wouldn’t yank their CB1, but with the way he was playing you certainly have to try and mask his deficiencies… for example, move him to the slot.

If you are loyal to a T then you’ll find yourself unemployed very quickly in professional sports. Unfortunately for Rhule, he hasn’t figured out how to walk the line.

Whether it’s straight up lying about “how excited” he was to work with Cam or his inability to find a spot on the field for Jackson (other than opposite of McLaurin), he still has a lot to learn about how to handle tough situations.

They started playing more Zone to help him.. Not much else he could do..

They move him to the slot then the Team just puts Mcclarin in the slot or you have a lesser CB covering Mcclarin in the outside??

At some point you got to trust a player to get his poo together because the other options aren't good either...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, MillionDollarCam said:

I get what you are saying and to a point you are right. Most coaches wouldn’t yank their CB1, but with the way he was playing you certainly have to try and mask his deficiencies… for example, move him to the slot.

If you are loyal to a T then you’ll find yourself unemployed very quickly in professional sports. Unfortunately for Rhule, he hasn’t figured out how to walk the line.

Whether it’s straight up lying about “how excited” he was to work with Cam or his inability to find a spot on the field for Jackson (other than opposite of McLaurin), he still has a lot to learn about how to handle tough situations.

And Again Ron made similar mistakes in his 2nd year of coaching.. You don't just fire coach unless you see no improvement and he has lost the locker room.. Which hasn't happened here..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

They started playing more Zone to help him.. Not much else he could do..

They move him to the slot then the Team just puts Mcclarin in the slot or you have a lesser CB covering Mcclarin in the outside??

At some point you got to trust a player to get his poo together because the other options aren't good either...

I personally don’t think zone was the answer. There’s no reason to punish the rest of your defense because one guy is shitting his britches.

McLaurin is known to be an outside guy, he can play in the slot but just last year he stated that he was learning the position.

I’d take my chances on the fact that they don’t move him inside and if they do at least the deep threat is off the board and you have linebacker help.

If they keep him on the outside then you have Gilmore there to play press man.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

And Again Ron made similar mistakes in his 2nd year of coaching.. You don't just fire coach unless you see no improvement and he has lost the locker room.. Which hasn't happened here..

To me it’s not about the coaching… it’s the wasting of a year and a half to find out that the answer was “truly on the roster”.

I think he gets another year but it’s playoffs or bust next year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, MillionDollarCam said:

I personally don’t think zone was the answer. There’s no reason to punish the rest of your defense because one guy is shitting his britches.

McLaurin is known to be an outside guy, he can play in the slot but just last year he stated that he was learning the position.

I’d take my chances on the fact that they don’t move him inside and if they do at least the deep threat is off the board and you have linebacker help.

If they keep him on the outside then you have Gilmore there to play press man.

You haven't come up with a coaching change that was better...

Mcclarin can play all over the field so moving CB to avoid him won't work.. Playing zone is always the way to cover up for a DB in 1 on 1 coverage.having problems.

Our LB were the problem today also playing at horrible depth...  

There were also broken coverage plays from other Db's that hurt us.. 

It was just a bad matchup.. Its okay to admit that

Edited by WOW!!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, MillionDollarCam said:

To me it’s not about the coaching… it’s the wasting of a year and a half to find out that the answer was “truly on the roster”.

I think he gets another year but it’s playoffs or bust next year.

But we're talking about 1 position.. The hardest position to find on the team.. I'm just saying most coaches get more then a year and a half to find there QB.. Especially when they done a solid job at most every other position... right??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, WOW!! said:

You haven't come up with a coaching change that was better...

Mcclarin can play all over the field so moving CB to avoid him won't work.. Playing is always the way to cover up for a DB in 1 on 1 coverage..

Our LB were the problem today also playing at horrible depth...  

There were also broken coverage plays from other Db's that hurt us.. 

It was just a bad matchup.. Its okay to admit that

Bad matchup for sure…

But I did suggest a change unless you glossed over it.

McLaurin plays the least amount if his snaps in the slot… that’s where you move Jackson. Okay, so what happens when they move McLaurin to the slot.. at that point you have linebacker help and worse case scenario you are giving up 5-10 yard completions rather than 20+ yard completions. You can also rotate him with Bouye so that Jackson isn’t completely out of the game plan but he also isn’t hurting you every play. It’s certainly better than being flat out benched.

Onnnnn the other hand…

If WFT doesn’t move McLaurin to the slot then you play Gilmore on him and at that point you can play man across the board and shade the safety to McLaurin’s side to deal with his speed.

It’s not rocket science… In fact, Rhule should pop open a Webster’s, the definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over while expecting different results.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No, the casual fan gets sucked into THIS^^^ kind of thinking, and it's so woefully incorrect that it's almost sad. The first is what I've said numerous times, NOTHING about non guaranteed contracts save the billionaire owners a single penny, because they still have to spend their cap floor, and the only reason teams ever don't spend the full limit, is to then roll it over into the next season to be able to spend more that year. But in the end, owners pay the same amount of money no matter what. The reverse is also the same, that the players in totality make the same amount of money as well, because in your example of Clowney not getting that money this year, it will go to another player, as the cap needs to be spent. And you say how we just cut Clowney after we gave him the 2 year contract, but everyone including Clowney's agent and himself, knew when it was signed, that it was more likely to be a 1 year contract than a 2 with how it was structured.  The 2nd year was just to be able to spread out the cap hit and he was always most likely going to end up getting traded or cut. It's why agents and players don't care about the total money in a contract, it's always and only been about the guaranteed money, as the years and overall value are meaningless, always have been, always will be.
    • Agents will have their 1st round picks hold out until the pay structure of their contract is to their liking, not how much money they'll get or even how much is guaranteed, just the when/how they will get the money over the course of the contract. If they're willing to recommend those players hold our, do you really think they won't do it for 2nd rounders to guarantee them an extra 10% of their entire rookie contract?
    • If BY continues to develop.  XL learns how to catch with his speed. Tet lives up to his hype... THEN Brooks comes back.. dammmmmmmmmmmmmm
×
×
  • Create New...