Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Nobody talking about Minshew?


BurnNChinn
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, WOW!! said:

I agree.. Still don't want to act like Tribusky, Minshew or whatever backup QB you ppl come up with are good..

I don't think anyone is trying to argue that they're "good". They were simply far more palatable options than the options we ultimately chose, primarily due to the reality that we would've had way loess resources invested in them.

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Teddy is the same pedestrian player he was with us, just on a bit better of a team. He's always going to be one of those marginal starter/good backup types. Kinda like Minshew.

Teddy can actually work the Game manager thing to a winning season.. That's the difference between him Darnold, Trubisky and Minshew.. All who proven they can't even be consistent at that..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I don't think anyone is trying to argue that they're "good". They were simply far more palatable options than the options we ultimately chose, primarily due to the reality that we would've had way loess resources invested in them.

Yes palatable "being" your still a losing team with no future at QB but you keep the compensations from sorry Darnold deal.. I agree.. But they still suck they aren't franchise QB so stop lusting for them to be our QB.. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

Yes palatable "being" your still a losing team with no future at QB but you keep the compensations from sorry Darnold deal.. I agree.. But they still suck they aren't franchise QB so stop lusting for them to be our QB.. 

You gotta stop overstating things. No one is "lusting" after these guys. We just didn't want to spend all those resources pursuing trash. Myself and many others said this all along. Why Panthers brass thought Teddy and Darnold would prove to be something other than what they'd always proven to be I have no clue, especially when guys who have played better were available for way less.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

You gotta stop overstating things. No one is "lusting" after these guys. We just didn't want to spend all those resources pursuing trash. Myself and many others said this all along. Why Panthers brass thought Teddy and Darnold would prove to be something other than what they'd always proven to be I have no clue, especially when guys who have played better were available for way less.

You're making threads about them why??

Why even have a discussion about other trash QBs???

This thread was a attempt to be "I told you so" Bs about a garbage QB winning a game.. lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

12 INTs, 6 fumbles. Teddy last year? 11 INTs and 6 fumbles, but 9 fewer TDs.

Teddy last year 1st year on a new team (new coaches,)  with no offseason (pandemic) season with the youngest defense in the league during a rebuild..

Context..

Trubisky 2018 had a year in the system with a top 5 defense..

Difference..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That new home page looking sexy and thicc
    • Serious question:  Why LG and not RG?  There may be something I do not know, but Hunt's contract is huge and he could be let go after this season (post june 1 cut) and it would save the Panthers a ton of money.  Extending him would be paying a G who is in his mid 30s guaranteed money (and I do not see that as a terrible thing).  So if we release him at age 31, we save $19m.  I like him, but at 31, will he be worth the mega contract?   LG Damien Lewis has actually outperformed Hunt and he is a year younger.  He would also save less vs. the cap and leave less in the dead cap pool.  While his current contract expires after the 2027 season, he is a better prospect (IMO) to extend because only 50% of his current contract was guaranteed.  Here are his contract numbers.   Now, getting to Ickey--he could want LT money if he is offered a second contract.  If we pay him LT money to play either G positions, we are likely overpaying.  Secondly, the injury he suffered could be one that limits his productivity.  Ickey was improving, but he was an average LT.  The only way I re-sign Ickey is to have him accept a G contract and make a lot of it incentive based.     I feel like I am missing something, but in my mind, Ickey was always a guard if you consider the fact that he is an average OT and would be a great G.  Is that still the case (injury)?
    • Supplemental draft uses picks from next year. So a team were to draft him in the 1st, their upcoming 1st next draft would no longer be available. There have been some notable players that were obtained in the supplemental draft, such as Kosar. It doesn't necessarily happen every year either, and is more on a as needed basis. The gambling trouble is a big red flag for teams, and maybe pushes him down to a 4th? Not sure a team would use a 1st on him.
×
×
  • Create New...