Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Perryman to the pro bowl

ncfan

By ncfan,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Toomers Mentor

Toomers

Posted
Posted
Just now, Mvp2014 said:

players and draft capital are the only currency here.  

If he wasnt practicing and was likely to be cut its a free pick

So what do you get for the 2M(and a 7th rounder) you spent on him? A 6th round pick. There’s nothing “free” about it. You believe teams would give up 2M to move from the 7th to the 6th round? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Waldo Grand Master

Waldo

Posted
Posted
52 minutes ago, Jared Patterson said:

Just like the Butker thing though and Christenson not starting. Its just pure incompetence in evaluating.... he is still much better than Carter and we had him on a super cheap two year contract. We lose Carter next year and will have to pay someone more who will likely not be as good now.

It honestly sounded like he never meshed with the staff so good for him to get out.

The evaluation part doesn't hurt anymore, I'm numb at this point to their subpar evaluations. It offers more to the case of damaging incompetence that is this staff and why they should be fired.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Toomers Mentor

Toomers

Posted
Posted
15 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

Bc we were going to cut him, but instead flipped him for a pick….. we signed a FA and traded him immediately and has zero impact on our cap the year we use the draft pick.

 

it’s really not that hard to figure out.

Since it’s 1M this year, and 1M next year, how doesn’t it effect any year with the pick? And that doesn’t change that the 2M is gone. For a bump from a 7th to a 6th. 
 

  It’s easy to figure out if you’re not looking for an excuse for a mistake. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
TheCasillas Grand Master

TheCasillas

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, Toomers said:

Since it’s 1M this year, and 1M next year, how doesn’t it effect any year with the pick? And that doesn’t change that the 2M is gone. For a bump from a 7th to a 6th. 
 

  It’s easy to figure out if you’re not looking for an excuse for a mistake. 

that’s your perspective man. I don’t agree with you, but I’ll respect it. So let’s just leave it at that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • TD alt
      Leave our mark.

      By TD alt · Posted

      Some of you act like one can't learn from experience over time. Just because you may not know what you're doing in 2018 doesn't mean that you don't know what you're doing in 2025. Frankly, you grow from experience, and success and excellence gives first-time applicants the hand probably 99.999% of the time.
    • frankw
      Delete this franchise

      By frankw · Posted

      It's an interesting topic of conversation as sports evolves. I think ultimately it would lead to a number of small market franchises folding though. Especially in the NBA where there are so many bad teams that have been bad for years and years in some cases already. But as it stands I think athlete pay draft or no draft aside has reached a point where we can and should realistically ask should they make that much compared to the average person. Now college athletes is a different conversation but even that reaches a breaking point. But we could go down the rabbit hole on this even further into overall entertainment and talk about actors making absurd sums too. In the end I think in sports the powers that be won't allow these changes to even be considered because it opens the door for so many other variables. But who knows how long sports like football will realistically be around after people like us pass on. We're only just now learning about things like CTE which the league and the sport in general will only be able to run away from for so long. As far as the NBA goes my understanding is viewership has been steadily going down for a number of reasons but one crucial aspect is key players missing so many games. The NBA has to figure that out regardless. Especially when considering fans who pay to see these athletes compete in person. But hey I guess let's just try to appreciate what we've got while it still exists in this form eh?
    • PanthersNCSU
      Delete this franchise

      By PanthersNCSU · Posted

      I can't see a world where the money goes down, but maybe your lottery odds are now your contract numbers you can offer.  Thunder? You can offer Flagg 4 years, 20 million.  Hornets? You can offer Flagg 4 years, 80 million.  Some form of a system where the money is still there, but so is the freedom of choice (on top of bad teams getting *some* competitive advantage to signing them). 
×
×
  • Create New...