Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Cam Newton is now top 25 in all time Rushing Touchdowns


WarPanthers89
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, mav1234 said:

The only season PFF records his "accuracy" numbers before his major injuries was 2018 where only 13% of his throws were considered bad throws, putting him in the top/bottom 10 of the NFL in terms of bad throw %.  Maybe you assume his arm was worse than other QBs because you watched him more?  Yes Cam missed receivers high on occasion and didn't always have the best touch, but he threw incredible balls and won us games with his arm all the time. 

as to an elite arm, you're moving the goal posts.  He was an elite QB.  Not all elite QBs have elite arms (hell for that matter a lot of them don't, lol).  If you want to break Cam's rushing out from his passing you can, but that isn't what judges someone's status as elite... just your personal opinion of them.

as to not being honest, most posters here would acknowledge he isn't a surefire lock to the HoF.  You're the one that comes in here and basically says he wasn't a good QB lol

He was an above average QB and great Football player.  Those aren't the same things. 

When he was healthy he was the 10th or 12th best QB in the league which makes him not elite 

There are tons of guys I would have traded him for if life was like a video game.

Elite QBs you aren't willing to trade for anyone. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Catsfan69 said:

He just stole the TDs from them.

They'd get us inside the 3 then he'd keep the ball. 

this is 100% not true, and it has been shown before.  but let's entertain this.  so our RBs certainly would be pumping out those TDs when Cam wasn't in games right? 

Chubba has 4 rushing TDs on the year.  He got 2 in his first 5 starts before Cam, 2 in his last few games with Cam.  No noticeable difference.  In the 5 games before Cam started, we had what, 2 rushing TDs?  We've had 7 since he has started.  His 5 are the difference LOL.

In 2018, Cam missed 2 games; all 7 of CMCs rushing TDs came in games WITH Cam.

In 2014, Cam missed 2 games; all 5 of JStew's rushing TDs came in games WITH Cam.

Cam takes away from his passing TDs by rushing, not the RB carries.  In fact, the ability for us to run an option offense may increase the potential of some of those RBs getting scores, because the lines they had to play behind have been so abysmal at times lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is CAM a HOFer????

Its a tough one for me.....I feel yes with a few years of waiting.....but you can make a case for and against..... Id also note my standards are higher than the current HOF ones......its not hall of very good.......and Cam is/was very good for parts of his career......its a tough one...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Catsfan69 said:

He was an above average QB and great Football player.  Those aren't the same things. 

When he was healthy he was the 10th or 12th best QB in the league which makes him not elite 

There are tons of guys I would have traded him for if life was like a video game.

Elite QBs you aren't willing to trade for anyone. 

this doesn't really track with the reality tho. you are projecting your own biases.  the numbers don't bear this out...

He was top 10 in his prime EASILY and overall often top 5. the only legit argument against Cam is longevity IMO. the rest is bias / preference.

PFF's AV attempts to catch the value of every season of every player.  it is far from perfect.  but it is one quasi-objective way for us to compare the list of QBs you came up with earlier.  so let's look at Cam during his pre injury prime and his peers during this same period (to address the bold, which IMO ended in 2015), and then up to 2018, which includes multiple injured seasons:

image.png.e8375b357d4e9f3f6ca87a82cd8b456c.png

 

did I forget any names from your list?

Edited by mav1234
brees copied twice, woops
  • Pie 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, mav1234 said:

this doesn't really track with the reality tho. you are projecting your own biases.  the numbers don't bear this out...

He was top 10 in his prime EASILY and overall often top 5. the only legit argument against Cam is longevity IMO. the rest is bias / preference.

PFF's AV attempts to catch the value of every season of every player.  it is far from perfect.  but it is one quasi-objective way for us to compare the list of QBs you came up with earlier.  so let's look at Cam during his pre injury prime and his peers during this same period (to address the bold, which IMO ended in 2015), and then up to 2018, which includes multiple injured seasons:

image.png.e8375b357d4e9f3f6ca87a82cd8b456c.png

 

did I forget any names from your list?

I'll make this simple for you.

All names in their prime would you trade Cam for straight up in his prime. 

Brady

PAYTON

Breese

Rivers

Stafford

Wilson 

Roethlisberger 

Eli

Ryan

Rogers

Carr

 

If you can name more than two you'd trade him for then no he's not HOF.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Catsfan69 said:

I'll make this simple for you.

All names in their prime would you trade Cam for straight up in his prime. 

Brady

PAYTON

Breese

Rivers

Stafford

Wilson 

Roethlisberger 

Eli

Ryan

Rogers

Carr

 

If you can name more than two you'd trade him for then no he's not HOF.

 

Your argument that Cam isn't a hall of famer is because you would trade him for 6 hall of famers and some personal preference QBs? Looool smh. Man o man.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Catsfan69 said:

I'll make this simple for you.

All names in their prime would you trade Cam for straight up in his prime. 

Brady

PAYTON

Breese

Rivers

Stafford

Wilson 

Roethlisberger 

Eli

Ryan

Rogers

Carr

 

If you can name more than two you'd trade him for then no he's not HOF.

 

So you think only 2 players on this list are going to the HOF? Lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, mav1234 said:

So you think only 2 players on this list are going to the HOF? Lol.

No I'm saying you don't trade a hofr for an equal commodity. 

See if I was GB for example there is nobody I'd trade Rogers for.

Same for Brady Payton and maybe Breese. I'm not trading those guys at all.

Big Ben I'm only considering a trade for Brady or Rogers.

 

With Cam there's a lot of guys you insta trade for.

BTW you didn't answer the question. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Catsfan69 said:

No I'm saying you don't trade a hofr for an equal commodity. 

See if I was GB for example there is nobody I'd trade Rogers for.

Same for Brady Payton and maybe Breese. I'm not trading those guys at all.

Big Ben I'm only considering a trade for Brady or Rogers.

 

With Cam there's a lot of guys you insta trade for.

BTW you didn't answer the question. 

Why should I? You claimed Cam wasn't even top 10 in his prime, I showed you numbers that disagreed and you ignored them lol.  In his prime Cam averaged seasons in the top 5 of all QBs.

The issue with Cam is longevity, not performance in his window.

There is absolutely zero chance that Cam is traded for any of those guys you list after the 2015 season... hell It's even unlikely he gets traded for any of them in his first few years either lol, because he was so promising.

Now looking back, it's easy to argue a trade because of longevity.  But Cam had one of the best rookie seasons for a QB ever and had several great seasons after it, and while still young, had an incredible MVP season.  In his prime he doesn't get traded either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, mav1234 said:

Why should I? You claimed Cam wasn't even top 10 in his prime, I showed you numbers that disagreed and you ignored them lol.  In his prime Cam averaged seasons in the top 5 of all QBs.

The issue with Cam is longevity, not performance in his window.

There is absolutely zero chance that Cam is traded for any of those guys you list after the 2015 season... hell It's even unlikely he gets traded for any of them in his first few years either lol, because he was so promising.

Now looking back, it's easy to argue a trade because of longevity.  But Cam had one of the best rookie seasons for a QB ever and had several great seasons after it, and while still young, had an incredible MVP season.  In his prime he doesn't get traded either.

Answer this healthy Cam in May of 2016.

NE calls and says Brady for Cam straight up. Do you pull the trigger?

How about GB and Rogers?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Catsfan69 said:

Maybe. 

I just think when it comes down to Championship or no Championship you need a QB that can win with his arm and make great throws in crunch time.

Russ is Duel threat weighted towards throwing. 

Mahomes is also Weighted towards throwing. 

Young again duel threat weighted towards throwing. 

I can't remember a QB winning a Superbowl who was weighted towards running. Of course I could be mistaken. 

 

(Runs per season/career comp%)

Roger Staubach (50/57.0), Steve Young (70/64.3), Patrick Mahomes (60/65.9), Russell Wilson (90/65.1), John Elway (50/56.9), Aaron Rodgers (60/65.2), Joe Theismann (40/56.7), Brett Favre (50/62.0)

 

Cam Newton (100/60.0)

Your "weighted" argument is weak. All QBs throw the ball. Cam has thrown for as many yards as Troy Aikman and Kurt Warner, and Cam's career INT% is lower than both of them. Cam is as good if not a better passer than John Elway, Troy Aikman, Brad Johnson, Trent Dilfer, Nick Foles, Eli Manning, Jeff Hostetler, Phil Simms, Joe Flacco, Mark Rypien, Doug Williams, Joe Theismann, Jim McMahon, Jim Plunkett, Ken Stabler, Terry Bradshaw, and Joe Namath. That accounts for more than half of the SB winning QBs. What SB winning QBs have when it comes to setting up a winning drive is receivers who have amazing concentration and good hands, OLs who don't make stupid mistakes that end drives, and coaches that call plays to their teams strength when it comes down to the passing game to move the ball down the field for a game winning drive.

Will there be rare QBs who would be an improvement over Cam Newton? Yes. Is your weighted to passing argument garbage? Yes.

  • Pie 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's no doubt a HOF'er and should be a first ballot.  I dont care what haters say, the dude has more rushing TDs than HOF RBs and held numerous records for passing TDs, as well as games with both a rushing and passing TD.  Point being, the league has never seen a player like him before and likely never will again.  And in regards to trading him for any other HOF-level QB?  Prime Cam?  2015 Cam?  I'm not trading him for anyone.  His ability to produce TDs on his own was unmatched due to his ability as a runner in addition to having an absolute cannon with good to great accuracy - and he literally has the ball in his hands, every play.  He is obviously past his prime now, and he still is the single hardest player to stop running the ball on any play he takes the snap while he's on the field.  It is an unreal, videogame-like skillset.  Sure, other guys may have been consistently more accurate, but no other QB outside of maybe Brady or Manning in their primes (because of their ability to adjust, counter, and call their own plays and then execute on every play) was harder to stop, and again, Cam was probably harder because you couldn't take away both the pass and the run.  Period.

Also, just saw he has the most rushing TDs since 2011...  more than Derrick Henry and Adrian Peterson.

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, CPantherKing said:

 

(Runs per season/career comp%)

Roger Staubach (50/57.0), Steve Young (70/64.3), Patrick Mahomes (60/65.9), Russell Wilson (90/65.1), John Elway (50/56.9), Aaron Rodgers (60/65.2), Joe Theismann (40/56.7), Brett Favre (50/62.0)

 

Cam Newton (100/60.0)

Your "weighted" argument is weak. All QBs throw the ball. Cam has thrown for as many yards as Troy Aikman and Kurt Warner, and Cam's career INT% is lower than both of them. Cam is as good if not a better passer than John Elway, Troy Aikman, Brad Johnson, Trent Dilfer, Nick Foles, Eli Manning, Jeff Hostetler, Phil Simms, Joe Flacco, Mark Rypien, Doug Williams, Joe Theismann, Jim McMahon, Jim Plunkett, Ken Stabler, Terry Bradshaw, and Joe Namath. That accounts for more than half of the SB winning QBs. What SB winning QBs have when it comes to setting up a winning drive is receivers who have amazing concentration and good hands, OLs who don't make stupid mistakes that end drives, and coaches that call plays to their teams strength when it comes down to the passing game to move the ball down the field for a game winning drive.

Will there be rare QBs who would be an improvement over Cam Newton? Yes. Is your weighted to passing argument garbage? Yes.

Emphatically! Imagine 100 fire emojis here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This seemed to be what the Teppers wanted, as Stroud hit the ground running and the Texans became his team almost day one. I hope Bryce's play starts to speak for itself if he isn't very vocal, because it does make a difference. I mean, Cam had to jack up Josh Norman who was a fifth round pick in the coach's doghouse in year five! I wonder what Bryce would do in a situation like that. Thank goodness there was no Steve Smith here when he was drafted!
    • https://data.honolulu.gov/nominate/302623 https://data.honolulu.gov/nominate/302620 https://data.honolulu.gov/nominate/302618 https://data.honolulu.gov/nominate/302615 https://prospectivestudentsportal.ed.ac.uk/forums/general-discussion/dcb71657-7b29-ef11-8ee8-002248c6fb91 https://prospectivestudentsportal.ed.ac.uk/forums/general-discussion/68913b3b-7b29-ef11-8ee8-002248c6fb91 https://prospectivestudentsportal.ed.ac.uk/forums/general-discussion/a9a38e26-7b29-ef11-8ee8-002248c6fb91 https://prospectivestudentsportal.ed.ac.uk/forums/general-discussion/68aaf812-7b29-ef11-8ee8-002248c6fb91 https://prospectivestudentsportal.ed.ac.uk/forums/general-discussion/9427cee4-7a29-ef11-8ee8-002248c6fb91 https://portal.exportcontrolsforms.defence.gov.au/public/67358581-f223-ef11-8ee7-6045bd3d1735/forum-posts https://mysupport.dnetsoft.com/forums/general-discussion/bc422a6c-5b29-ef11-a296-000d3a862bd3 https://mysupport.dnetsoft.com/forums/general-discussion/927e7525-5b29-ef11-a296-000d3a862bd3 https://mysupport.dnetsoft.com/forums/general-discussion/2662d13d-4f29-ef11-a296-000d3a862bd3  
    • [Payroll Assisted]- How do I contact (Intuit) QuickBooks payroll 𝘀𝘂𝗽𝗽𝗼𝗿𝘁 phone Help? 24*7 https://data.honolulu.gov/nominate/302623 https://data.honolulu.gov/nominate/302620 https://data.honolulu.gov/nominate/302618 https://data.honolulu.gov/nominate/302615 https://prospectivestudentsportal.ed.ac.uk/forums/general-discussion/dcb71657-7b29-ef11-8ee8-002248c6fb91 https://prospectivestudentsportal.ed.ac.uk/forums/general-discussion/68913b3b-7b29-ef11-8ee8-002248c6fb91 https://prospectivestudentsportal.ed.ac.uk/forums/general-discussion/a9a38e26-7b29-ef11-8ee8-002248c6fb91 https://prospectivestudentsportal.ed.ac.uk/forums/general-discussion/68aaf812-7b29-ef11-8ee8-002248c6fb91 https://prospectivestudentsportal.ed.ac.uk/forums/general-discussion/9427cee4-7a29-ef11-8ee8-002248c6fb91 https://portal.exportcontrolsforms.defence.gov.au/public/67358581-f223-ef11-8ee7-6045bd3d1735/forum-posts https://mysupport.dnetsoft.com/forums/general-discussion/bc422a6c-5b29-ef11-a296-000d3a862bd3 https://mysupport.dnetsoft.com/forums/general-discussion/927e7525-5b29-ef11-a296-000d3a862bd3 https://mysupport.dnetsoft.com/forums/general-discussion/2662d13d-4f29-ef11-a296-000d3a862bd3     Having reliable 𝘀𝘂𝗽𝗽𝗼𝗿𝘁 for your QuickBooks Payroll is crucial. Whether you're a seasoned user or just getting started, the QuickBooks Payroll Help Number 𝟏(𝟖𝟑𝟑)𝟓𝟕𝟓-𝟔𝟏𝟏𝟏 is your go-to resource for assistance. This guide is designed to align with your user preferences, providing a seamless experience tailored to your needs. 1. Quick and Direct: Phone Call Assistance Connecting with QuickBooks Payroll Help is a breeze with a direct phone call. Dial 𝟏(𝟖𝟑𝟑)𝟓𝟕𝟓-𝟔𝟏𝟏𝟏 for instant 𝘀𝘂𝗽𝗽𝗼𝗿𝘁 or follow these steps for a callback option: Option 1: Dial the Number Call 1-800-4INTUIT (𝟏(𝟖𝟑𝟑)𝟓𝟕𝟓-𝟔𝟏𝟏𝟏) and select your product. A live representative will be ready to assist. Option 2: Request a Callback Visit the QuickBooks 𝘀𝘂𝗽𝗽𝗼𝗿𝘁 website, click on "Contact Us," fill out the form, and QuickBooks 𝘀𝘂𝗽𝗽𝗼𝗿𝘁 will contact you at your convenience. Whether you opt for a direct call or a callback, QuickBooks ensures 24/7 𝘀𝘂𝗽𝗽𝗼𝗿𝘁 to address your specific concerns. 2. Speaking to a Live Person: Your Options For a more personal touch, explore these options to talk to a live person at QuickBooks Payroll Help: Option 1: QuickBooks 24-Hour 𝘀𝘂𝗽𝗽𝗼𝗿𝘁 Number Call 𝟏(𝟖𝟑𝟑)𝟓𝟕𝟓-𝟔𝟏𝟏𝟏 or 800-446-8848 for immediate assistance, available 24/7. Option 2: Priority Circle Members Priority Circle members enjoy exclusive 24/7 live 𝘀𝘂𝗽𝗽𝗼𝗿𝘁 at 𝟏(𝟖𝟑𝟑)𝟓𝟕𝟓-𝟔𝟏𝟏𝟏, with callback and screen-sharing options. Option 3: QuickBooks Customer 𝘀𝘂𝗽𝗽𝗼𝗿𝘁 Chat Accessible Monday through Friday, 8 AM to 9 PM ET, through the Help menu in your QuickBooks interface. Option 4: Saturday 𝘀𝘂𝗽𝗽𝗼𝗿𝘁 Hours For Saturday inquiries, call 𝟏(𝟖𝟑𝟑)𝟓𝟕𝟓-𝟔𝟏𝟏𝟏 from 6 AM to 3 PM PT. Option 5: Email 𝘀𝘂𝗽𝗽𝗼𝗿𝘁 For written communication, send an email to the provided 𝘀𝘂𝗽𝗽𝗼𝗿𝘁 address for assistance. Option 6: Callback Feature Available for QuickBooks Online for Accountants and QuickBooks Online customers. Utilize the callback feature for personalized 𝘀𝘂𝗽𝗽𝗼𝗿𝘁. 3. Community Engagement and Social Media Expand your connections beyond traditional channels: Option 1: QuickBooks Community Forum While not a direct 𝘀𝘂𝗽𝗽𝗼𝗿𝘁 line, the online forum is a valuable resource for users to connect, share experiences, and seek advice. Option 2: Social Media Channels Follow QuickBooks on Facebook, Twitter, and LinkedIn for updates, announcements, and engagement with the QuickBooks community. Remember, your experience with QuickBooks Payroll Help should align with your preferences. Whether through direct calls, online forms, or community engagement, QuickBooks is dedicated to ensuring you have the assistance you need when you need it. Don't hesitate to reach out – help is just a call or a form submission away. For immediate assistance, call 𝟏(𝟖𝟑𝟑)𝟓𝟕𝟓-𝟔𝟏𝟏𝟏. If you prefer a callback, visit the QuickBooks 𝘀𝘂𝗽𝗽𝗼𝗿𝘁 website and fill out the contact form. QuickBooks is here to make your 𝘀𝘂𝗽𝗽𝗼𝗿𝘁 experience smooth and efficient, 24/7. 4. Navigating Automated Menus for Quick Assistance Maximize your call to QuickBooks Payroll Help by paying attention to the automated menu choices. Choose the option that aligns with your concern for the quickest route to talk to a real person at QuickBooks. 6. QuickBooks Community Forum: Building Connections Tap into collective wisdom. In addition to direct 𝘀𝘂𝗽𝗽𝗼𝗿𝘁 channels, QuickBooks boasts a vibrant online community forum. While not a direct line to customer 𝘀𝘂𝗽𝗽𝗼𝗿𝘁, the forum serves as a valuable resource for common issues, workarounds, and general tips. Engage with fellow users, share experiences, and seek advice to optimize your QuickBooks experience. 7. Social Media Channels: Stay Connected Connecting beyond 𝘀𝘂𝗽𝗽𝗼𝗿𝘁. QuickBooks maintains an active presence on various social media platforms, including Facebook, Twitter, and LinkedIn. While these channels aren't primary 𝘀𝘂𝗽𝗽𝗼𝗿𝘁 platforms, following them ensures you stay updated on the latest features, updates, and announcements. It's also an opportunity to connect with the QuickBooks community. For assistance with QuickBooks Payroll, please reach out during the designated support hours. You can contact QuickBooks customer support at 1-800-4INTUIT (1-800-448-6841) or 1(833)575-6111. Ensure you call within the official support hours to connect with a helpful support team member. 8. Ensuring Weekend 𝘀𝘂𝗽𝗽𝗼𝗿𝘁: Saturday Assistance Weekend help at your fingertips. For those with inquiries on Saturdays, QuickBooks customer service is open from 6 AM to 3 PM PT at 𝟏(𝟖𝟑𝟑)𝟓𝟕𝟓-𝟔𝟏𝟏𝟏. This extended 𝘀𝘂𝗽𝗽𝗼𝗿𝘁 ensures that users have ample opportunities to seek assistance even on weekends, catering to diverse schedules. 9. Email 𝘀𝘂𝗽𝗽𝗼𝗿𝘁: The Written Route For those who prefer the written word. If you lean towards written communication, QuickBooks offers email 𝘀𝘂𝗽𝗽𝗼𝗿𝘁. Drop a message at the provided 𝘀𝘂𝗽𝗽𝗼𝗿𝘁 email address, and the QuickBooks 𝘀𝘂𝗽𝗽𝗼𝗿𝘁 team will promptly assist you. This option provides a convenient way to articulate your concerns in writing. 10. Callback Feature for QuickBooks Online Users Contact us through your product. Sign in to your QuickBooks Online company, go to Help (?), select Contact Us, enter your concern, then select Let's talk, and choose a way to connect with us. Remember, QuickBooks Payroll has 24/7 𝘀𝘂𝗽𝗽𝗼𝗿𝘁 for phone and messaging, excluding occasional downtime. 𝘀𝘂𝗽𝗽𝗼𝗿𝘁 hours cater to diverse schedules and ensure assistance is available whenever you need it. Call 𝟏(𝟖𝟑𝟑)𝟓𝟕𝟓-𝟔𝟏𝟏𝟏 for immediate help. Your seamless QuickBooks experience is our priority.  
×
×
  • Create New...