Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Is Tepper a bottom 5 owner?


Is Tepper Bottom 5  

96 members have voted

  1. 1. Well, is he?

    • Yes
      66
    • No
      30


Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, Cary Kollins said:


the jaguars have been terrible for two decades. Their current owner has been in place over ten years. 

If Tepper is still flailing to find a coach in year eleven, fair enough. 

I don't think most people have the patience to devote their time to / spend their hard earned money on a team that might be good seven years from now.

Edited by Mr. Scot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mr. Scot said:

I don't think most people have the patience to devote their time to / spend their hard earned money on a team that might be good seven years from now.


Who’s saying that lol, nice straw man. My response was in regards to you comparing the panthers to the Jags, which is ridiculous at face value. All I’m saying is people claiming Tepper is one of the worst owners in the league 3.5 years into the gig is a childish overreaction, which is not uncommon on sports message boards. 

Edited by Cary Kollins
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Cary Kollins said:

Who’s saying that lol, nice straw man. My response was in regards to you comparing the panthers to the Jags, which is ridiculous at face value. All I’m saying is people claiming Tepper is one of the worst owners in the league 3.5 years into the gig is a childish overreaction, which is not uncommon on sports message boards. 

It's not a comparison of the Panthers and Jags. It's an example showing the silliness of suggesting that better facilities equals good ownership.

Do you have any evidence to offer on the football side of the equation that would support the notion of David Tepper being a good owner?

Not facilities, not investments, not anything besides the actual on the field product...

Edited by Mr. Scot
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/8/2022 at 5:12 PM, The NFL Shield At Midfield said:

Depends on the metric.  In terms of actual results on the field yeah, Carolina is one of the true shitcan teams.  For actual football Tepper is bottom five.

For other aspects, Dan Snyder is the worst person to own an NFL franchise and it's not close.  Kroenke and Spanos basically told their original host cities and fans to go fug themselves.  The McNairs are documented assholes.  Up until very recently Bucs fans didn't have anything good to say about the Glazers.  Of course the Lions are perennial garbage.

e: Tom Benson was a scumbag too.  He was actively working toward moving the Saints out of New Orleans after Katrina until Paul Tagliabue basically talked him out of it.

Your post took a weird turn with the Ford's.  The Ford's are bad owners...for results on the football field.  For much of everything else they are actually pretty good owner's.  

I would swap out the Lions for the Bengals.  That guy is a trip if you start digging deep into the details.  Before Marvin Lewis got to the Bengals, players were not allowed to take Gatorade home.  That's a small example of how cheap and far behind they were...and they haven't caught all the way up yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This reads like a Falcons fan comment
    • I'm an old man, too. My back hurts and I yell at the clouds plenty. That's why I use the antenna.  I have never paid for cable TV. I have cable internet, but not TV. I get that we can feel like companies charge too much for a service, but I don't believe they are price gouging. They are simply working in the free market. When their price gets too high, either customers will decide to find another source or not watch at all.  When the system is working correctly the customer always feels like they could get a slightly better deal and the supplier always feels like they could have charged a little more. On a side note, is there anyway you could post that pricing plan from the 1900's. I would love to see what we were complaining about back then.
    • I don't like round pegs and square holes.  I can be find with either.  You just have to pick one.  It's been that simple from the start.  Carolina remains in the round peg/square hole phase of life.  again, you are fixated like most Bryce supporters on how passes are graded.  Again, Teddy Bridgewater can grade well on the deep passes overall he happens to make.   If he grades well on those select passes.....that doesn't somehow magically mean he isn't checking down out there is isn't pulling trigger when he needs to.  The well graded deep pass doesn't make Teddy a gunslinging chunk passer playing the way a scheme would need him to. They remain two different things. his deep ball at Bama wasn't good.  That's not my soapbox but you can find threads on that too where that he been discussed in detail.  He just could just make off target throws to wide open dudes.      
×
×
  • Create New...