Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

After today, everyone should understand you need a QB


AU-panther
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, TheRumGone said:

I get it. I wanted fields or move up for Lance this past year. 
 

I just don’t trust this staff to pick the right guy is all.

even if it flounders it’s far more conducive to your long term success to have josh Rosen lead you to kyler Murray than to have a parade of 1st round picks spent elsewhere 

i mean don’t get me wrong, the quality of the product was better when it was a team game. But it really isn’t anymore, not in the way it used to be.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Growl said:

even if it flounders it’s far more conducive to your long term success to have josh Rosen lead you to kyler Murray than to have a parade of 1st round picks spent elsewhere 

i mean don’t get me wrong, the quality of the product was better when it was a team game. But it really isn’t anymore, not in the way it used to be.

If we’re throwing darts at the board as far as qbs I take Malik with a coach like Hackett. Dude has all the talent in the world just needs to be coached up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

That's a HUGE concern though. Especially coming off an injury that may lead to never getting back to 100%.

I'm not bring petty. You're being unrealistic and extraordinarily revisionist.

Drafting a QB #5 with medical flags actually speaks to how well thought of Tua was.   Remember, he went just ahead of Herbert who had no medical red flags.  Ron took Chase young (defensive junky), The Lions were still all-in on Stafford, the Giants had just drafted Jones the year prior.  Had there been a need, Tua and Herbert could actually have gone higher.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, TheRumGone said:

If we’re throwing darts at the board as far as qbs I take Malik with a coach like Hackett. Dude has all the talent in the world just needs to be coached up.

If we pick him at 6........Jesus Christ.    If we were to trade down and get more picks I wouldnt cry picking him in the late teens only if we got a poo ton of picks for #6.  Straight picking him at 6 with no intention of playing him is retarded at the very best

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Growl said:

even if it flounders it’s far more conducive to your long term success to have josh Rosen lead you to kyler Murray than to have a parade of 1st round picks spent elsewhere 

i mean don’t get me wrong, the quality of the product was better when it was a team game. But it really isn’t anymore, not in the way it used to be.

Also another thought is Darnold is that Rosen that can lead us to a kyler Murray. Why not just roll with him, draft a blue chip lineman? Something to think about.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, TheRumGone said:

If we’re throwing darts at the board as far as qbs I take Malik with a coach like Hackett. Dude has all the talent in the world just needs to be coached up.

I’m waiting to see who the OC is before i start gravitating to anyone.

pickett’s got a lot of starts, could weather some bad coaching for a season. If I like the choice at OC, I may be willing to stretch a bit more.

Edited by Growl
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, mrcompletely11 said:

If we pick him at 6........Jesus Christ.    If we were to trade down and get more picks I wouldnt cry picking him in the late teens only if we got a poo ton of picks for #6.  Straight picking him at 6 with no intention of playing him is retarded at the very best

This next season is fuged regardless. I said if I had to pick a qb at six it would be Malik with the plan to get a new staff to groom him. If rhule is longterm here no way would I want him grooming Malik. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Growl said:

even if it flounders it’s far more conducive to your long term success to have josh Rosen lead you to kyler Murray than to have a parade of 1st round picks spent elsewhere 

i mean don’t get me wrong, the quality of the product was better when it was a team game. But it really isn’t anymore, not in the way it used to be.

In the long term especially with the rookie salary cap it’s cheaper to use your first rd. picks at QBs vs what we have done with trading picks and wasting salary cap on Teddy and Darnold.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TheRumGone said:

Also another thought is Darnold is that Rosen that can lead us to a kyler Murray. Why not just roll with him, draft a blue chip lineman? Something to think about.

I mean we tried that. Now we’re talking about improving the roster around darnold a bit more and hoping things get worse.

and of course you’re still discounting a valuable and plausible opportunity at finding a franchise guy. Seems kind of bird in hand to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
    • I see Bryce's development this way: He improved when his supporting cast improved.  TMac and Dowdle saved his arse last year, but in fairness, most good QBs have good WRs and good RBs--and good OLs.   The 2025 OL underperformed, actually. They were above average, but they should have been elite if you consider the salary cap.   As soon as we signed Lewis and Hunt, I started thinking, "That's not sustainable.  With Ickey about to get paid a LT salary, Moton and Hunt grabbling $50m per season combined, and Lewis around $17m--that would be nearly $100m and the Center just walked.  Yikes.  What does that mean?  Rico walks, Mays walks, and we do not have a top 5 WR on a second contract.  We do not have an elite TE, and only 1 is on a modest second contract. And now Bryce will demand $50m for his incremental rise to mediocrity?   So when we sign Bryce, we will get weaker at other positions.  Hunt, Moton, maybe Ickey and Lewis, will all be casualties--that is the right move regardless (not sure yet about Ickey, but he was not elite) Bryce is one lucky, entitled camper.  No competition since being drafted, and he lost his job for a while to the aging clipboard holder.  Now we are bringing in UDFAs and busts to compete with him.  
×
×
  • Create New...