Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Albert Breer on the Panthers quarterback options


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Growl said:

And it’s a really bad take. The panthers don’t exist to stick it to Matt rhule or to acquire lots of cap space. They exist to win games. Suggesting that they should intentionally handicap the team to accomplish either of the former things is S dumb a thing as you can possibly read online.

Who pissed in your cornflakes?

This team isn't winning anything and one single player is not going to change that.  But you do you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tepper has wanted Watson this entire time once he clears. That’s really it. 

And it’s still likely not to happen and he wants a QB so now we’re looking at a lot of pretty meh options.

We’ve got the Saints, Steelers, Broncos, Packers, Giants, Falcons, WFT all looking for QBs, we’ve got our work cut out. a trade especially for Jimmy is going to be super overvalued and we’ll be wasting so much to get a game manager.

I’m meh on Pickett, Strong, Willis, somewhat interested in Corral or Ridder but this rookie class just ain’t it. 

I just wish he put as much desire for greatness at HC as he apparently does at QB. 

I see no good options with a ton of storied franchises and teams in much better spots needing QBs.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Jon Snow said:

Who pissed in your cornflakes?

This team isn't winning anything and one single player is not going to change that.  But you do you.

I’m sorry that you’re operating with a laughably unrealistic pretense of the way the world works so I’ll list it out

-Dave tepper is not going to instruct matt rhule to intentionally do things which hinder the team from developing or winning

-Matt rhule’s job is not to “prepare the roster” for the next coach no matter much Henry Huddler may wish it so

-anyone who doesn’t think the QB position doesn’t have the kind of influence to turn around a team shouldn’t be poisoning others with their bad takes

-the draft has precious little to do with next season and the team isn’t making decisions with that fixation

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Growl said:

And it’s a really bad take. The panthers don’t exist to stick it to Matt rhule or to acquire lots of cap space. They exist to win games. Suggesting that they should intentionally handicap the team to accomplish either of the former things is S dumb a thing as you can possibly read online.

NFL teams handicap coaches all the time when they know the coach's time is most likely nearing an end. 

and we have seen that here too. 

NFL teams don't try to win as many games as possible every year.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, CRA said:

NFL teams handicap coaches all the time when they know the coach's time is most likely nearing an end. 

and we have seen that here too. 

NFL teams don't try to win as many games as possible every year.   

Lol you’re referring to the lockout? Jerry trying to stick it Peyton Manning does not constitute willfully handicapping a coach with the ultimate hope that he will fail. Tepper had too much riding on this. They aren’t having a fire sale. They aren’t tanking. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Growl said:

Lol you’re referring to the lockout? Jerry trying to stick it Peyton Manning does not constitute willfully handicapping a coach with the ultimate hope that he will fail. Tepper had too much riding on this. They aren’t having a fire sale. They aren’t tanking. 

Was referring to the end of John Fox.  

and I think the 2022 draft should be handled like the 2010 draft.  Only hopefully this time our GM doesn't bomb it.  This draft shouldn't be a Matt Rhule draft. 

Not doing everything to win the most games possible in a given year isn't claiming they are tanking or having a fire sale.  All 32 teams aren't in win now windows nor are all 32 confident in their HC they will have next year being the answer going forward.  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, CRA said:

Was referring to the end of John Fox.  

and I think the 2022 draft should be handled like the 2010 draft.  Only hopefully this time our GM doesn't bomb it.  This draft shouldn't be a Matt Rhule draft. 

Not doing everything to win the most games possible in a given year isn't claiming they are tanking or having a fire sale.  All 32 teams aren't in win now windows nor are all 32 confident in their HC they will have next year being the answer going forward.  

So what exactly is this in-between between trending up or down?

No team in the league intentionally plans for a .500 season. You are either building or deconstructing. You don’t group together in the board room and say “look, we’re gonna win 7 games this season and then we’re gonna fire you coach, so don’t add any new players and try not to win too much!”

teams either believe they are trending up or down and operate as such. Every move the panthers have made so far-every single one-has indicated which direction they believe they are heading.

dave tepper didn’t keep Matt rhule with the intent to be bad next season, no matter how many absurd fan conspiracies you may have read online.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Growl said:

So what exactly is this in-between between trending up or down?

No team in the league intentionally plans for a .500 season. You are either building or deconstructing. You don’t group together in the board room and say “look, we’re gonna win 7 games this season and then we’re gonna fire you coach, so don’t add any new players and try not to win too much!”

teams either believe they are trending up or down and operate as such. Every move the panthers have made so far-every single one-has indicated which direction they believe they are heading.

dave tepper didn’t keep Matt rhule with the intent to be bad next season, no matter how many absurd fan conspiracies you may have read online.

I mean, every team doesn't fall into the tank for the #1 draft pick or believes they are in a legit SB window. 

I would say the Panthers are in a slow rebuild.  Fully aware, that it is likely the rebuild continues on under a new HC.   So I think the Panthers will overall focus on slowly building up and improving foundational aspects of the team continuing to slowly improve. 

But you aren't going to waste resources for Matt Rhule to attempt to win as many games as he can this year.   That is counter productive to building something big picture IMO.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, CRA said:

I mean, every team doesn't fall into the tank for the #1 draft pick or believes they are in a legit SB window. 

I would say the Panthers are in a slow rebuild.  Fully aware, that it is likely the rebuild continues on under a new HC.   So I think the Panthers will overall focus on slowly building up and improving foundational aspects of the team continuing to slowly improve. 

But you aren't going to waste resources for Matt Rhule to attempt to win as many games as he can this year.   That is counter productive to building something big picture IMO.  

There’s no such thing as a “slow rebuild,” the days of the 5 year plan are long since gone, and nothing the panthers have done up to this point suggests the panthers are operating under this pretense.

you’re insinuating some insane notion of secret handshake meetings between tepper and fitterer where they agree to simply let rhule flounder, and it’s delusional. They’re going to sign free agents. They’re going to evaluate maximum impact draft prospects. Nobody working for the panthers is intentionally trying to have a mediocre season by simply waiting it out. Everyone’s job is on the line. Also the notion that a franchise QB isn’t “foundational” is lolz.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Growl said:

There’s no such thing as a “slow rebuild,” the days of the 5 year plan are long since gone, and nothing the panthers have done up to this point suggests the panthers are operating under this pretense.

you’re insinuating some insane notion of secret handshake meetings between tepper and fitterer where they agree to simply let rhule flounder, and it’s delusional. They’re going to sign free agents. They’re going to evaluate maximum impact draft prospects. Nobody working for the panthers is intentionally trying to have a mediocre season by simply waiting it out. Everyone’s job is on the line. Also the notion that a franchise QB isn’t “foundational” is lolz.

I mean, there is when you hire someone unqualified in Matt Rhule to lead a rebuild.   

and no, you haven't seen it to date because Matt Rhule had rightfully been given the power and green light.  But now that it is clear he looks like a dud and has high odds of being a lame duck.....yeah, it changes how you go about things if you are a front office.  Or if you are remotely competent.  To an extent you can no longer responsibly be all in on Matt Rhule's vision. 

Everyone's job isn't on the line.  Matt Rhule and company are the ones with the job on the line.  And when you are on the hot seat.....you start rightfully getting your hands tied to a degree.   Because a front office has to mitigate how bad Rhule could continue to make things in this window....once most seem to realize he is a mistake.  You have to start thinking about the scenario the next guy will be taking over to continue the rebuild.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, CRA said:

I mean, there is when you hire someone unqualified in Matt Rhule to lead a rebuild.   

and no, you haven't seen it to date because Matt Rhule had rightfully been given the power and green light.  But now that it is clear he looks like a dud and has high odds of being a lame duck.....yeah, it changes how you got about things if you are a front office.  Or if you are remotely competent.  To an extent you can no longer responsibly be all in on Matt Rhule's vision. 

Everyone's job isn't on the line.  Matt Rhule and company are the ones with the job on the line.  And when you are on the hot seat.....you start rightfully getting your hands tied to a degree.   Because a front office has to mitigate how bad Rhule could continue to make things in this window....once where most seem to realize he is a mistake. 

Yeah this isnt a hard concept what you are laying out.  Not sure why he isnt understand this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, CRA said:

I mean, there is when you hire someone unqualified in Matt Rhule to lead a rebuild.   

and no, you haven't seen it to date because Matt Rhule had rightfully been given the power and green light.  But now that it is clear he looks like a dud and has high odds of being a lame duck.....yeah, it changes how you go about things if you are a front office.  Or if you are remotely competent.  To an extent you can no longer responsibly be all in on Matt Rhule's vision. 

Everyone's job isn't on the line.  Matt Rhule and company are the ones with the job on the line.  And when you are on the hot seat.....you start rightfully getting your hands tied to a degree.   Because a front office has to mitigate how bad Rhule could continue to make things in this window....once most seem to realize he is a mistake.  You have to start thinking about the scenario the next guy will be taking over to continue the rebuild.    

You’re projecting your own distaste for Matt rhule onto what you think the team should be doing, not that it makes any sense because no organization would simply resign themselves to 5-8 win season without making corresponding moves to prepare for a rebuild.

how will you rationalize all this when players aren’t given away in a firesale? How will you rationalize when the panthers sign players in free agency? 

what you’re doing doesn’t exist. Dave tepper isn’t saying to himself, “we spent so much money Sam darnold, our cap, our precious cap, Rhule MUST swallow his medicine.”

it isn’t real. It’s a fantasy conjured by stupid fans who obsess over trivial things like the salary cap as if they personally paid money into it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Um, no, just no. Bills, Chiefs, Chargers, Ravens, Bengals, Texans, Eagles, Commanders are 8 teams that it's not even a debate, they aren't trading their QB for Purdy. Patriots, Broncos, Titans, Giants, Bears, Vikings, Falcons are 7 more teams with QBs drafted in the last 2 years that also would rather stick with them than trade for Purdy as they all have more upside than he does. Lions, Packers, Cowboys, Bucs are 4 more that would likely keep their QB's as well, age aside for Goff, Dak, and Baker. Panthers and Colts are two teams in the same situation, QB's who have both struggled and shown flashes to where the teams probably stick with them because they drafted them, but in a re-draft of all QB's, they probably take Purdy over the guy they currently have. Jags, Cardinals, Dolphins, are 3 more with QB's who probably have a higher upside than Purdy but come with their own question marks, so debatable if they'd take Purdy over who they already have. That leaves Jets, Raiders, Steelers, Browns, Saints, Seahawks, and Rams. Rams would take him over Stafford for the future of course, but not for 2025, and I'd think the Seahawks would take him over Darnold, but honestly not sure if they would take him over Milroe at this moment as they really like his potential and have him for 4 years really cheap. That leaves 5 teams that I see who would absolutely take him over their current situation right now, and a handful of others who MIGHT take him over their current guy, a far cry from your 20.  
    • Agreed. Also as soon as they received the top pick in the next draft it was over. Bears won that trade. Gave up a top overall pick got one the next year plus pick 9, a couple 2nds, and DJ Moore a proven young WR. Had their 2024 pick from us be in the late teens or later it would be more debatable IMO. 
    • Option A:  Pay your starting QB starting QB money. Option B:  Look for a starting QB for 4-10 years (or longer) while wasting the talent at every other position.    How many of the top 20 QB's do you think are worth what they are being paid?   When you factor in the last year of his present deal his contract is really an average of 45 million per year which in today's QB market is a very, very good deal. I wish we'd had found a Brock Purdy to pay 50+ million a year right after we parted ways with Cam.  Ya'll go ahead and live in fairy tale land where good to great (much less elite) QB's are available to pay. Just the fact that they had the chance to pay Brock after the disaster of trading up for Lance is a testament that when you find a quarter back you can win with, complete in the playoffs and superbowls with, you pay him.  
×
×
  • Create New...