Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Marvin Lewis reveals that he interviewed with the Panthers in 2002 despie already telling John Fox he got the job


ENCPantherfan2
 Share

Recommended Posts

40 minutes ago, jbland said:

Experience. 

I have taken job interviews that 

1. I knew I was a long shot to land

2. I didn’t want the job to begin with 

experience in job interviews is important and it is very wise of you to say this because the interview experience in itself is very valuable

Edited by 4Corners
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, 4Corners said:

NDAs need to be illegal. I can think of very few instances in which one would need to be signed. 

Just a way to legally hide problems by paying them off and making it stay in the closet with the rest of the skeletons.

It makes sense professionally at times but the personal BS is just legal blackmail as I see it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While I completely understand the Rooney Rule and it’s purpose, the NFLs implementation and use of it is a joke. It’s nothing more than some PR fluff and like others have stated, just another box to be checked by the owners before they hire who ever the hell they want. It honestly probably causes more harm than good for reasons like this.

Unfortunately, the majority of owners are are bunch of 50+ year old white billionaires who grew up in a time when racism ran rampant throughout this country. I’m sure these owners just like any other major business owner will say no one is going to tell them how to run their business. That’s capitalism and money = power.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That's neither on Ickey nor Bryce, that's a coverage sack. There were plenty of examples where he drifted into pressure or didn't move in the right direction, but on this play we sent two men out deep and Max Protected with both TEs and the RB staying back to block. Both receivers were completely covered down the field with zero checkdown options and the pass rush got home. Bryce took a deep drop back due to the PA and to let the receivers get deeper. That was the play design This sack isn't "Clearly on the QB". There were plenty of examples where Bryce drifts in the pocket or bailed toward pressure last season (open up a random clip from the Jags game for examples), but this is not one of them. Blame Frank and his dumbass playcalling/design for sending two slow receivers who don't get open well on deep routes with no other options on this one.
    • Some things look horrible but you had the position covered. Some things look horrible because they really were.
    • Well this one is more like it, 28-3 Falcons in the 3rd before I just stopped.  Sorry.  Bryce lovers: watch the Chicago game not this one. Bet the farm on Bryce.
×
×
  • Create New...