Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rhule to Auburn?

Carolina Cajun

By Carolina Cajun,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

MHS831 Grand Master

MHS831

Posted
Posted
21 hours ago, poundaway said:

To be fair, this isn't the first and only thread bitching about Rhule.   

Its. On. Every. Thread....

...regardless of how the threads are titled.  Not sure where any poster can go on any topic that doesn't bitch about Rhule.

 

"bringing back Taylor is a monumental mistake. It just wastes another year for Burrow."  Recent history says keeping Zac is a mistake (thebengalsboard.com)

They are not bitching about Rhule--they are bitching about people even discussing the remote chance that Rhule leaves for college.  There is a difference.  They do not understand the concept of a discussion board or the possibility that theories that are opposed to their own baseless opinions have enough validity to be discussed.  So instead of going onto a thread about those who want to consider the possibility and trolling them for doing so--they should just refrain from clicking on the thread altogether.

I am an educator (higher ed) and I am not the grammar police, but I can estimate the level of intelligence with some degree of accuracy by simply reading posts.  We all can to a degree.  It bothers me to see some half-baked moron calling others out with no supporting facts by mocking their intelligence.  It is one of this board's great ironies.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
11 hours ago, @bonafidebanter said:

Rhule should have never gotten more than one year here. Treat him like these other coaches that get one year and they're done. 

Nah, I can understand and supported him getting a second year. We had a bad record but everyone expected us to have a bad record and we were largely competitive. We really looked like we could be a better QB away from making some noise. Then we traded for Sam Darnold and I was officially on the "yeah, this college guy ain't gonna work out" bandwagon from that point on. There's no way he should've gotten a third year after this season's dumpster fire.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
@bonafidebanter Community Regular

@bonafidebanter

Posted
Posted
On 2/5/2022 at 9:44 AM, LinvilleGorge said:

Nah, I can understand and supported him getting a second year. We had a bad record but everyone expected us to have a bad record and we were largely competitive. We really looked like we could be a better QB away from making some noise. Then we traded for Sam Darnold and I was officially on the "yeah, this college guy ain't gonna work out" bandwagon from that point on. There's no way he should've gotten a third year after this season's dumpster fire.

I agree with you, but I was making a point about better coaches than Rhule only getting one year and you never hear from them again. Rhule, will get another job and another job and another job. Get what I'm saying?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • tukafan21
      We joke about how the NFL has a script for the season. But maybe it's not a joke?

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • rayzor
      Our guys working their azz's off to be the winners they know they are!!

      By rayzor · Posted

      Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Rocky Davis
      NHL Draft 2025

      By Rocky Davis · Posted

      Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...