Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Receiver Coach hire


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Basbear said:

Clear upgrade across the group, about the only one that ???? is the WR hire, hes just got very limited exp. Seems sharp, I listen to some of his interviews, just wanted a more exp..

Wilks is the best improved coaching hire, hes got a young super talented group...they are in good hands. Tabor is another big improvement. The biggest leap is the exp of this group compared to former, what a huge difference.

Im going to state that the  DL coach will step down before the end of TC, watch.

Hope this group bring home the NFC south crown to the queen.

 

Agreed. The only hire I’m questioning is Pasqualoni. A wealth of experience but I’d have preferred someone with a better track record with the DL. Joe Cullen would’ve been great but he took the KC job and I’m not sure we were even interested. Read up on the Joe Bailey hire and it seems to be a good one despite the lack of NFL experience. He’s generally considered to be very a bright and hard working coach with ties to McAdoo.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Prowler2k18 said:

No big loss. Outside of Tommy Tremble our TEs weren’t much to brag about, although it may have more to do with our previous offensive philosophy. Hoping the new offensive staff will design a better system to maximize their talents. 

Can we judge him for Ian Thomas when Matt Rhule insisted on keeping him?

Also have to wonder how keeping Dan Arnold would have affected our view of tight end performance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, BurnNChinn said:

I don’t really care about the hires anymore because these guys will only be here a year. Rhule won’t be here after this year anyway. Waste of time worrying about who we’re hiring right now.

There are guys I'd like to keep even if Rhule is fired (Campen, for one).

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Khyber53 said:

Just prepping for McAdoo to take over HC position after the bye week.

Edit: I mean Interim HC position.

It’s really bad as fans we have to look forward to this instead of our team winning. I mean owner knows he made a mistake and won’t fix it, instead a just tries to fix his mistake by making his embarrassment hire guys with experience. If he fired Rhule I would have been like ok you made a mistake and I’m glad your noticed it. Now you know, NFL knows and we know as fans but u stuck with it. LOL

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

Can we judge him for Ian Thomas when Matt Rhule insisted on keeping him?

Also have to wonder how keeping Dan Arnold would have affected our view of tight end performance.

Probably not. Arnold certainly would have helped. 

The poor OL may have factored in also, as we needed the TE’s to be less of a factor in the passing game to help with blocking. Hoping these staff changes will yield better results on the field. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Just because all draft picks are a gamble doesn't mean you don't have a better chance at hitting on a better player the higher you're drafting. It would literally be like someone saying, I'll give you 1 or 2 free spins on a slot machine, and you say you'll take the 1 because you're not likely to win anything anyways with 1 or 2, so why bother? The Cowboys desperately wanted T-Mac, but because they were 4 picks behind us, they weren't able to get him.  If you told Cowboys fans that had they lost 2 more games last year in a lost season, that it would get them the player they wanted so badly, would they in retrospect go back and lose those games to get their guy? 95% of them would take that trade off in a heartbeat, and the others who wouldn't are the fans who would rather enjoy an extra win or two in a poo season to then set themselves up to be better for the next decade. I also think the fans who argue against this thinking, get too caught up in the "well that means you're going to be rooting against us late in the season even if we still have a shot at the playoffs." Which isn't true, it's saying if you're telling me right now we'd make the playoffs but lose in the first round, that I'd rather end up 8-9 or 9-8 and just miss the playoffs because in our opinion, the benefits that come along with that outweigh the benefit of the players getting 1 game of playoff experience.
    • In relation to tanking. I think you can count on one hand the number of people here who actually want us to lose football games. When accounting for it across the fanbase it amounts to maybe 2% of the entire Panthers fanbase. But you engage with some internet trolls and think haters are coming out of the woodwork and hey look at that it's all a conspiracy that leads to Bryce Young haters. Do you hear yourself sir? If it sounds ridiculous that's because it is. I mean at this point do you see Bryce haters in your dreams? As far as the culture of this franchise goes we seem to be doing better in that department via what we are building right now and with the people we have in place. But we also shouldn't just make assumptions just yet either. The rubber still needs to meet the road. And going back to previous seasons I think we can acknowledge although tanking obviously isn't a thing there were some times where we thought our culture was improving but really it wasn't. Yes I'm looking directly at some of those wins under Wilks. If the culture had truly changed we would not have lost to the Steelers who have been mediocre for years at home the way we did and they were starting Mitch Trubisky ffs. We did not change our culture for the better and we won games that ultimately meant nothing. It was just a brief mirage. We've done this for years now. The harsh truth of the matter is the Panthers have not had a winning season or been to the playoffs in going on 8 years but in those years they've been trying to convince themselves they aren't poo but in the process all they've done throughout most of that time period is squander better draft position and we were still the worst team in the league for our troubles. At the end of the day we should be able to just be adults and reconcile with that. And no that isn't being "pro tank" or any other boogeyman term it's simply recognizing reality.
    • He's an asset in a game manager role. But as soon as you have to ask him to go out there and try to make plays and not just take what the defense is giving him... well, Darnolding happens.
×
×
  • Create New...