Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Just throwing this out there..


WOW!!
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, WOW!! said:

We also watch that team barely beat a Titans and Raiders team with better Olines.. 

We also saw a San Francisco team with the worst QB in the Playoffs beat the best QB and best WR in the league at their house..

 

1 minute ago, TheCasillas said:

this is super old. RT are just as important as LT now in the league. Teams used to spend a lot of money on focusing on rushing the passer's blind side. Now it goes both ways. 

You have an argument, but your argument is a bit dated.

There is a story by Chris Trapaso under it as well did you read that..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

We also watch that team barely beat a Titans and Raiders team with better Olines.. 

We also saw a San Francisco team with the worst QB in the Playoffs beat the best QB and best WR in the league at their house..

“this team lost but they maybe could’ve won”

like lol what kind of argument is that

glad you mentioned the niners, the niners just traded away years worth of plug and play 1st round hog mollies because they knew they didn’t have an elite QB

the QB they did have cost them a super bowl

now they’re getting rid of him

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Growl said:

“this team lost but they maybe could’ve won”

like lol what kind of argument is that

glad you mentioned the niners, the niners just traded away years worth of plug and play 1st round hog mollies because they knew they didn’t have an elite QB

the QB they did have cost them a super bowl

now they’re getting rid of him

 

Yes they traded for a higher rated prospect more of a sure thing ..

You want to take a swing a lower level prospect based on desperation and position value.. Okay

But your taking a swing on prospect rated on the same level as the QB San Francisco is trying to get rid of...

Think about that..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, unicar15 said:

Definitely don’t think Love is a bust at this point. He’s been playing behind a 1st ballot HOFer who just isn’t ready to go elsewhere yet. Who knows…if he has an entire season to play maybe he puts together a good career. Problem is that at thus point he’s gonna go somewhere else to do it and so he’ll be learning all over again. 
 

BUT! He’s 6 mo younger than Pickett and has already been in the league three years. To me he’s further ahead of Pickett, has more natural arm talent, and would cost less. So to me if you’re not going to draft Corral bc of superior physical traits to Pickett (in a move down) then trading a mid round pick for Love isn’t the worst idea. 

Yup.  He was a first round pick by Green Bay, who happen to know a thing or 2 about picking good QBs, for a reason. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

Yes they traded for a higher rated prospect more of a sure thing ..

You want to take a swing a lower level prospect based on desperation and position value.. Okay

But your taking a swing on prospect rated on the same level as the QB San Francisco is trying to get rid of...

Think about that..

Lol trey Lance was a sure thing? Trey Lance was an FCS QB who didn’t even play his final season. that’s about as opposite a sure thing as you can possibly be.

they traded three 1’s to get him. 

Edited by Growl
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, TheCasillas said:

I know, that is why I said it was dated. The article is from 2013. That was almost a decade ago, and the league has changed quite a bit, along with positional value.

Okay either way .. let's go by your position value now... Is it smart to take a lower prospect at a higher positional rate or a generational talent at a lower positional rate??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, WOW!! said:

Okay either way .. let's go by your position value now... Is it smart to take a lower prospect at a higher positional rate or a generational talent at a lower positional rate??

I dont think there is a blanket answer there. Its competely situational. Cowboys have been drafting "generational" 1st round talent for years... and it really hasnt done them much other than eat cap space.

Hurney drafted BPA while he was here, and that didnt turn into anything.

Bills and Patriots always draft postion of need but they have different results.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Growl said:

Lol trey Lance was a sure thing? Trey Lance was an FCS QB who didn’t even play his final season. that’s about as opposite a sure thing as you can possibly be.

they traded three 1’s to get him. 

Trey Lance by far would be the number 1 no question 1st pick in this draft... Him being in this draft alone would raise the positional rating of the QBS in this draft.. 

His physical talent alone makes every QB in this draft look like Chris ponder or Joey Harrington..

You can act like any QB in this draft is even close to the prospect Lance is but it wouldn't be true..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, WOW!! said:

Trey Lance by far would be the number 1 no question 1st pick in this draft... Him being in this draft alone would raise the positional rating of the QBS in this draft.. 

His physical talent alone makes every QB in this draft look like Chris ponder or Joey Harrington..

You can act like any QB in this draft is even close to the prospect Lance is but it wouldn't be true..

Why don’t you do an in depth breakdown of trey Lance the prospect for me then?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Growl said:

Lol trey Lance was a sure thing? Trey Lance was an FCS QB who didn’t even play his final season. that’s about as opposite a sure thing as you can possibly be.

they traded three 1’s to get him. 

And there's a lot of talk but he's still not ready.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • A lot of people have been slobbing all over this last draft but I hate the way that Fitterer/Morgan have built this offense since drafting Bryce. Anyone with eyes knew our IOL was crap but we didn't invest there and instead took project receivers and an injured RB. If you want a lesson in how build for your QB wrong, IMO, this was it. Draft him, protect him, THEN get him weapons. Its pretty much a rule, draft interior linemen, pay tackles. We're paying everyone. We had the opportunity to draft a center instead of Brooks, or perhaps instead of trading up for XL, trade back and take 2 guards/center. We could have paid Lewis and still drafted 2, but Hunt at 100m was just an overpay. And it's not like the guys many of us were begging us to draft were long shots. They're solid starters from day 1. Injuries happen. That's why all your starters can't be high value players. You need rookie contracts mixed in to be able to absorb those inevitable losses on the line. An offensive line playing an entire season together is an abnormality.  Factor into that also paying Moton 44m this offseason with a huge signing bonus when we didnt need to do right now to do him a "solid".  Now we have to sign Icky and possibly Bryce and it's a mess with more money tied up in the offense, inevitable cuts and dead cap coming. That's not even factoring in shifting Corbett to C last year after major injury to start at a position he's never played for an NFL season. It's all stuff that was foreseeable and pretty easily avoided.  The $$ and picks we've spent trying to surround Bryce outside of Tmac (Mitchell and Horn are TBD) have been used inefficiently IMO. Smarter drafting and FA with the line could have let us get more reliable weapons than XL and Sanders in FA. It might not be popular opinion, but I'll take a Bersin with hands that can get 6-8 85% of the time vs a big play XL with greasy fingers.  The part about hitting guys in stride was more about placement, which Bryce has struggled with. Obviously not every route is run to be hit in stride, but they do need to have the ball placed well to give the receivers a chance to do something after the catch. I just used Hill as an example because he's the biggest YAC threat I could think of over the past 5 years.   Receivers can feast on dink and dunk if it's schemed right. But to make it work, that vertical threat has to be there, if not the deep pass then the high speed routes that can spring someone for the huge YAC to keep the safeties from cheating into that 20 yard box all game.  I hope DC and Bryce can keep up what they did in the last game and it isnt just an Atlanta thing. But no matter what, I really want to see some better long term strategy coming from the FO. 
    • Eh. Don't speak it into existence lol. We've got enough on our plate just trying to overcome the bad juju of what has been our historically bad perfomances more often than not in primetime over the course of 30 years. We're overdue for a statement primetime game!
    • Passing chart had 3 over 20 I think. The Legette TD and another completion and an incompletion. All over 20 yards.  An incompletion at 19 or maybe 20 yards. So you could technically probably say 4 throws 20 or more.     That seems high to me compared to the norm. 45 throws and 10 YPA are both way high.   
×
×
  • Create New...