Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Sam Howell's Pro Day


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

27 minutes ago, The Huddler said:

i dont need to know your history

 

i see a UNC fan saying howell is the best when everyone has him at 4 or 5.  and i mean everyone 

 

im sorry but add those things together and that = a Homer! 

Nope. You don't need any additional info to arrive at your predetermined conclusion. You've shown it over and over. Hilarious of you to essentially be accusing others of what you epitomize. Congrats!

 

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Nope. You don't need any additional info to arrive at your predetermined conclusion. You've shown it over and over. Hilarious of you to essentially be accusing others of what you epitomize. Congrats!

 

68BBBFE8-E06C-4537-95EF-3645E93A6C19.jpeg.c8b2d931cafd4add255bc77429915290.jpeg

 

you didnt address or refute anything i said

 

all you did to shoot me down was say i don't know your history predicting UNC prospects.. 

 

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

@LinvilleGorge

 

if kenny pickett at 6 would be a horrible pick that would set this franchise back, what has sam howell done to make anyone think that hes a better QB.  He certainly didnt win as much as pickett. didnt elevate his team like pickett

 

im not saying we should take pickett, but no where have i seen any kind of actually argument for Howell over pickett, other than UnC homers on this board. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, The Huddler said:

i like howell as a prospect if we take him in the right place as an upside pick

 

bit taking him at 6 because hes the beat QB in the draft is silly and im not a troll for calling that out.  im giving my opinion

Oh... now you're gonna okay the "giving my opinion" card after you initiall

 

Just now, The Huddler said:

@LinvilleGorge

 

if kenny pickett at 6 would be a horrible pick that would set this franchise back, what has sam howell done to make anyone think that hes a better QB.  He certainly didnt win as much as pickett. didnt elevate his team like pickett

 

im not saying we should take pickett, but no where have i seen any kind of actually argument for Howell over pickett, other than UnC homers on this board. 

 

 

If you don't think Howell elevated UNC you didn't watch the games. I'm not sure UNC beats a single D1 opponent last year without Howell.

Hell, just of back and watch UNC vs. Pitt and honestly tell me who was the best QB on the field. Swap the QBs and Pitt wins that game by 3-4 TDs.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Just calling you out for what you are.

Meanwhile...

 

ok.  lets paise for a sec. I can admit that calling you a straight up homer was just to be pointy.  I didnt know if you werw ovwrly high on UNC players or not..

so i admit, that was a conclusion i jumped to..

 

but what i was trying to get at was i think you are way to high on howell because he went to UNC.  i think you are being a homer in this instance.  I think you think howell is the beat in the draft because of emotion, bot because of any circumstantial evidence. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Howell is the best QB in the draft because he has all the tools and he has shown he can handle adversity without getting rattled or frustrated. UNC was horrible last year. The OL absolutely fell apart and there was only one legit receiver on the roster. Howell had never ran before and transitioned to a one read and bolt QB out of necessity. I didn't need to see Howell go through progressions. I'd already seen it. What I got to see last year is how Howell handled getting the absolute hell beat out of him while having to carry the entire offense and not having a defense to lean on. Anyone who was high on Howell prior should honestly be even higher on him. Don't watch the team, watch the player.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Over and over again.

6afxhc.jpg.47b4cf550187d92b6e864de71069e4a7.jpg

Homer or not, choosing to die on the hill that Howell is the undisputed best QB in this class is an interesting choice. I guess you're rooting for him to go to the Steelers so you can root for them and finally give up on the Panthers like you've been threatening to do for months now. I guess we shall see.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I think Howell is the best QB in the draft because he has all the tools and he has shown he can handle adversity without getting rattled or frustrated. UNC was horrible last year. The OL absolutely fell apart and there was only one legit receiver on the roster. Howell had never ran before and transitioned to a one read and bolt QB out of necessity. I didn't need to see Howell go through progressions. I'd already seen it. What I got to see last year is how Howell handled getting the absolute hell beat out of him while having to carry the entire offense and not having a defense to lean on. Anyone who was high on Howell prior should honestly be even higher on him. Don't watch the team, watch the player.

ok. i can respect that reasoning and there are valid points to that

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

i can certainly respect howells maturity when things didnt go well and his stock dropped. 

 

he looks like baker mayfield but thats anti baker mayfield behavior 

 

like i said, I like howell and would like to take a chance on him at the right spot.  but not at 6.  Across the board everyone is saying this is a weak QB class and nowhere have i seen him ranked in the top two

 

sure, take a chance in him at the right spot as a value reclamation pick. id be all for that. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • We could quibble about was that an answer to what I asked but I  don’t see it as being one. Look, he agreed to this Evero thing. Up front. Apparently anyway. Took the job with those conditions in place. I buy that and will work off of it.  This play calling issue isn’t the same thing. I am not in the mood to delve into Canales’ shortcomings and get out the pitchforks at the moment. I will abstain from that topic and stick to the quandary the dissenters who want to usurp his play calling power, find themselves in. As far as that goes I am still on the fence and think the play calling is Bryce centric and the play selection/playbook is affected. That does not mean I know that if the playbook was open he would be great play caller. Just that he is hampered right now.  Inserting an OC not of Canales’ approval changes the original parameters of the assumed agreement.  Unless you think Tepper placed a contractual prescription to allow Tepper to dictate that he can insert a play caller of his choosing after a time period if he is not satisfied with Canales’ work.  Which, do you really think that is in play?  I do not.    Unless it is, Canales has the option to yea or nay. As I said, it could be forced on him. But they only do that if they want him out.  And as of now his stock is up, I would have to say I don’t own any but I think it is up. He had the stadium rocking, the team in the playoffs, and has that sorry lil draft pick trending upward. Even at this very low rate.  I think he has ‘hand’ right now as they say on Seinfeld. This is something that may get play in the 2026 season, not now. IMO.     
    • Canes now have 19 losses on the year. Here is the truly alarming stat. 13 of those were multiple goal loses. 9 of those were 3 goal plus losses. This team is getting blown out more than any other year under Rod.     why?  Blue line is a total mess. It’s just no good with their combinations.  It pains me to say this, but they were mikes better with Burns and Orlov. They need Slavin so bad.  Health.  Size. The team is too small and has no physical play. Most forwards do not forecheck.  Worst under Rod.  Goalie play. Pretty average to sub par. PK is downright bad. It’s allowing a little over a goal a game. Worst under Rod.    Team will not win a playoff round under its current group of players. It’s not constructed to do so against heavy teams.      solutions.  Must get physical size by the trade deadline. Rod and Tulsky know this. That probably has to come with the 2C.  KKs size but a better scorer and meaner.  The need another physical winger.  Goalie. Either go all in on a top guy on a bad team or get average. Lastly, better defense. Need a Right shot heavy defenseman.  Yes that could mean someone’s favorite dman could sit. Looking at you Boom.    thats 3-4 new guys that must be brought in for them to have a chance at a cup.  And it’s all players that are different and better than what they have.  They have the cap. KK is gone. Add 4 mill back.    And then hope it’s jells unlike Mikko.  
×
×
  • Create New...