Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Why the Panthers should take a QB (article)


Growl
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Growl said:

At some point you have to sack up and try

this team hasn’t made a single attempt to replace cam Newton, they’ve drawn it out playing games deluding themselves waiting for the perfect storm to come along and pass down the perfect QB prospect at the bottom of the top 10

it isn’t going to happen.

be a man Dave 

I'd rather sack up and try in a better situation with better prospects and more control..

Not when you have 1 pick in the top 125..

Not when you have a lame duck coaching staff..

Not when the prospect are all not considered  to be top 20 player in that draft..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

I'd rather sack up and try in a better situation with better prospects and more control..

Not when you have 1 pick in the top 125..

Not when you have a lame duck coaching staff..

Not when the prospect are all not considered  to be top 20 player in that draft..

stop answering all my posts weirdo

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Growl said:

you’re welcome to do it 

I don't have to.. I already know the the reality is Good to Avg LT are not available in FA .. If you want to secure that position you do it in the draft.. 

But thank you for the exercise in futility..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

Again I asked which 1 of these guys comes In with the 6'5 240 pound frame and top 3 QB arm in the league??

This is why he was worth the risk and considered a better Prospect then any QB in this draft??

You said he also never had a statistical season like Allen’s sophomore season. Just showing you that’s wrong. Also showed where they graded Watson lower than Pickett. It’s tough to evaluate these QBs…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

I don't have to.. I already know the the reality is Good to Avg LT are not available in FA .. If you want to secure that position you do it in the draft.. 

But thank you for the exercise in futility..

didn’t like the results huh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ForJimmy said:

You said he also never had a statistical season like Allen’s sophomore season. Just showing you that’s wrong. Also showed where they graded Watson lower than Pickett. It’s tough to evaluate these QBs…

I was thinking about Herbert JR season.. Allen was based on physical abilities..

And that Pickett poo is based on 1 season.. Everybody is trying to neglect 4 season before when he was a undrafted FA worthy prospect..

https://www.sports-reference.com/cfb/players/deshaun-watson-1.html

To

https://www.sports-reference.com/cfb/players/kenny-pickett-1.html

What were they watching then??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Growl said:

didn’t like the results huh

I see why ppl don't give your opinion any credibility now..

You seriously say something and then want other to do the research to make your point valid..

Lmao..

Do you honestly think this Jedi mind trick is working?? Lol

Edited by WOW!!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

I was thinking about Herbert JR season.. Allen was based on physical abilities..

And that Pickett poo is based on 1 season.. Everybody is trying to neglect 4 season before when he was a undrafted FA worthy prospect..

https://www.sports-reference.com/cfb/players/deshaun-watson-1.html

To

https://www.sports-reference.com/cfb/players/kenny-pickett-1.html

What were they watching then??

Hey I'm not arguing on Pickett, just showing how some scouts/places have him rated and how they were lower on Watson then they should be.  There is so many variables which is why we are able to make this any sort of debate/discussion.  I'm with you though in thinking this is the draft to take our LT at 6 (providing one of the big 3 are still there).  I think I'm leaning towards one of the 3 LTs, then 2 DEs, then trade down if possible.  If we don't draft a QB I think trading for Baker for the cheap might be our outcome with the least amount of long term damage.  Baker with our new OL could make games more watchable this year.  

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ForJimmy said:

Hey I'm not arguing on Pickett, just showing how some scouts/places have him rated and how they were lower on Watson then they should be.  There is so many variables which is why we are able to make this any sort of debate/discussion.  I'm with you though in thinking this is the draft to take our LT at 6 (providing one of the big 3 are still there).  I think I'm leaning towards one of the 3 LTs, then 2 DEs, then trade down if possible.  If we don't draft a QB I think trading for Baker for the cheap might be our outcome with the least amount of long term damage.  Baker with our new OL could make games more watchable this year.  

And I actually like Wills and would be way more comfortable with picking him if

1. The top 3 Tackles are gone and no good trade down scenario..

2. If we were in a different situation with draft assets and coaching security situation..

His physical talent alone is a reason to take the big swing I think this team should make in a different scenario..

But at this point I don't want to waste this pick on a player who is starting day 1 or isn't a for sure asset to a new coaching staff..

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Growl said:

At some point you have to sack up and try

this team hasn’t made a single attempt to replace cam Newton, they’ve drawn it out playing games deluding themselves waiting for the perfect storm to come along and pass down the perfect QB prospect at the bottom of the top 10

it isn’t going to happen.

be a man Dave 

I mean the perfect storm literally happened the last draft.   and they drafted a CB when Fields fell to them. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

You said he also never had a statistical season like Allen’s sophomore season. Just showing you that’s wrong. Also showed where they graded Watson lower than Pickett. It’s tough to evaluate these QBs…

Watson was the best player in college football his during the span of his last 2 seasons in college.  It doesn't have to be hard.  People make things hard. 

Watson was in a different tier than Pickett.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You’re playing madden we’re talking real football stuff…. He does have you seen his special on internet he def thinks he’s getting paid 
    • Without the team having an identity kinda hard to predict what they value.  They either are really trying to build a balanced team, or preparing for another swing at qb if Bryce doesn’t pan out. Seems like we value the o line but the $ spent there has been underwhelming besides Lewis, you could say it’s because of injuries but still hasn’t been worth the investment. as already stated, the whole handling of Bryce young as a whole has been ass backwards, we spent the years we’re supposed to take advantage of having a qb with a lower cap hit, building the team up to be adequate. now It appears, key word appears, the saints have done it correctly, which is painful to even think about. Regardless, I hope the front office has paid attention to qb contracts recently, such as Tua, Kyler, Daniel jones(pre colts) and don’t settle for subpar qb play at franchise qb rates    
    • This is the flaw in your logic.  Cutting 3 of our best players will somehow move us from whatever we are to "compete". Even the most Young super fans are not predicting a ceiling above top 10-12, and that will not nearly cut it.  Someone will need to break the log jam of QBs getting nothing or North of 50. Our qb is at best a middle ground, lets hope it will be us that also manage to pay the worth at about 100 over 3 years.  And before you jump me, yes that is only of he improves.
×
×
  • Create New...