Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Does Matt Rhule develop players?


poundaway
 Share

Recommended Posts

9 hours ago, Cam's New Arm said:

First of all, friendo, please don't make someone work so hard to reply to you. Quote people, please. Don't @ them. I have no idea what I said an hour ago, let alone however long ago you were.

Secondly, what did I say? lol

Chevy Chase Ellie GIF

it's not what you said.   It's what you did.   Giving me a poo for what?  For saying that Rhule gives out Migraines?

Is he a relative of yours?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, CRA said:

Yeah, as I said before the hire I ideally want an offensive HC and one that can basically take over if it isn’t up to par.   Ron was close to a being the polar opposite and did it on the defensive side.  

Rhule’s coaching career leading up to HC was basically to dabble in everything.  Jack of all trades, master of none.  Which in theory I guess is a good one to build a great resume to oversee a team. 

Some of the best coaches have coached both sides but specialize in one. I mean it goes beyond that and being a successful NFL head coach is insanely hard and really depends on your evaluation of coaches around you. Rhule hasn't imo been great at that either. He believes his system is superior and I'm not convinced. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Waldo said:

https://www.pro-football-reference.com/years/2021/opp.htm

Says 21 for 2021. I get your point but we were not a top 10 D by the end of the year. 

Snow is a solid DC for sure. A little DB crazed but solid unit. Plus add in the failed 2019 D switch that basically left our D to be rebuilt from ashes in 2020. 

We were second in total yards allowed, yes, even at the end of the year and without Horn.  It isn't the perfect measurement, but it is an important one.  Field position matters.   The defense was on the field substantially more than the O because the O would have a 3 and out, int or fumble, and still we were second in yards allowed.  We were 4th in 1st downs allowed.    Yes, total points is the only measure that matters but it doesn't tell the full story.  None of them do.

Say what you want, but when you look at the TOTAL DISASTER RR and Hurney left behind, it is a radical improvement to the year before where we were nearly 4 games without forcing a punt and were in the bottom half or 3rd in most categories.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, poundaway said:

We were second in total yards allowed, yes, even at the end of the year and without Horn.  It isn't the perfect measurement, but it is an important one.  Field position matters.   The defense was on the field substantially more than the O because the O would have a 3 and out, int or fumble, and still we were second in yards allowed.  We were 4th in 1st downs allowed.    Yes, total points is the only measure that matters but it doesn't tell the full story.  None of them do.

Say what you want, but when you look at the TOTAL DISASTER RR and Hurney left behind, it is a radical improvement to the year before where we were nearly 4 games without forcing a punt and were in the bottom half or 3rd in most categories.

 

We were the top team in points allowed in the bottom 1/3 of the NFL or last team in the 2/3 of the NFL. We also gave up terrible field position. The top 10 D does not stand, that is fair given what we both said. It could be  soon but the entire point of a defense is to stop the other team from scoring, not to allow less yards at the end of the day even if the stat really does matter in the total evaluation. There are some big positives on the D but saying it was a top 10 D is very misleading. That is fair not BS or hope or hype. 

Nothing I said is an wrong or even really negative unless that naritive this was a top 10 D really matters to you for some reason. Some good, some bad and we saw some improvements and some not improvements (Chinn at FS comes to mind). We are used to having good to great Ds and 2021 wasn't comparable to our top D even with the upside it showed throughout the year.

Lol Hurney helped build an all D draft that is a huge chunk of this D by the way...and I despise Hurney. So my point stands and you are trying to deflect to Hurney about how this crew did last year after drafting D in the 1st and a new GM...So still not Hurney's fault in 2021 and still not a top 10 D unless you are talking in yards allowed. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Waldo said:

We were the top team in points allowed in the bottom 1/3 of the NFL or last team in the 2/3 of the NFL. We also gave up terrible field position. The top 10 D does not stand, that is fair given what we both said. It could be  soon but the entire point of a defense is to stop the other team from scoring, not to allow less yards at the end of the day even if the stat really does matter in the total evaluation. There are some big positives on the D but saying it was a top 10 D is very misleading. That is fair not BS or hope or hype. 

Nothing I said is an wrong or even really negative unless that naritive this was a top 10 D really matters to you for some reason. Some good, some bad and we saw some improvements and some not improvements (Chinn at FS comes to mind). We are used to having good to great Ds and 2021 wasn't comparable to our top D even with the upside it showed throughout the year.

Lol Hurney helped build an all D draft that is a huge chunk of this D by the way...and I despise Hurney. So my point stands and you are trying to deflect to Hurney about how this crew did last year after drafting D in the 1st and a new GM...So still not Hurney's fault in 2021 and still not a top 10 D unless you are talking in yards allowed. 

I didn't say you were wrong, I was just filling in the picture.  I'm sure you weren't trying to create the impression that our defense was mediocre.   We weren't just top ten in yards,  we were 2nd in yards allowed, we were 3rd in yards allowed  per play, we were 4th in first downs allowed, we were 4th in passes allowed, 4th in passing yards allowed, and  2nd in passing first downs allowed.  Even in rushing, we were 8th in yards allowed per attempt.  We weren't just top ten in several categories, were top 5, not just yards.   

Hurney did draft a lot of the D.   Hurney also created a situation where we had to fill the D with rookies in 2020.    Rhule drove off Hurney, maybe his only long term contribution to the Panthers. 

That D improved dramatically in 2021 and in many defensive measurements, it wasn't top ten, it was top 5.

If we didn't have  Darnold, an injured CMC , dropsies Chubba/Anderson, a horrible OL made worse by injuries, and Joe "I can't tie my shoes without mouthing about the bunny" Brady, the D wouldn't have had one of the worst average starting field positions in the league and spend the entire game on the field.... and then the D would have been top ten in points as well.
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, poundaway said:

I didn't say you were wrong, I was just filling in the picture.  I'm sure you weren't trying to create the impression that our defense was mediocre.   We weren't just top ten in yards,  we were 2nd in yards allowed, we were 3rd in yards allowed  per play, we were 4th in first downs allowed, we were 4th in passes allowed, 4th in passing yards allowed, and  2nd in passing first downs allowed.  Even in rushing, we were 8th in yards allowed per attempt.  We weren't just top ten in several categories, were top 5, not just yards.   

Hurney did draft a lot of the D.   Hurney also created a situation where we had to fill the D with rookies in 2020.    Rhule drove off Hurney, maybe his only long term contribution to the Panthers. 

That D improved dramatically in 2021 and in many defensive measurements, it wasn't top ten, it was top 5.

If we didn't have  Darnold, an injured CMC , dropsies Chubba/Anderson, a horrible OL made worse by injuries, and Joe "I can't tie my shoes without mouthing about the bunny" Brady, the D wouldn't have had one of the worst average starting field positions in the league and spend the entire game on the field.... and then the D would have been top ten in points as well.
 

It was an overall average D with some upside. It also carried the O but that also is a big factor in the yards allowed, we allowed 200 more yards overall on the D than O had. We gave up 21 ints and only had 9 on D. 

I thought the entire idea was to get young and build the culture and foundation? Now it's forced to be young? Hurney did not trade for Sam lol. Yeah, I get we don't agree but your angles I just can't support or really understand on some levels. CMC was a big question mark last year, lots expeced him to get reinjured if we didn't stop Cam'ing him...we didn't and all signs point to it happening again (Rhule's own statment). 

Rhule has been much worse than Brady, Brady was just inexperienced. Rhule is Rhule. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Waldo said:

It was an overall average D with some upside.

If that makes you feel better.

Quote

Rhule has been much worse than Brady, Brady was just inexperienced. Rhule is Rhule. 

Not sure how you make that comparison, but whatever. 

My guess, Brady was just lucky to land at LSU with 3 HOFers and he'll never amount to anything.  He hasn't so far. 

  • The D 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/3/2022 at 8:43 PM, poundaway said:

I think Macadoo has.  I think Campen has. 

That’s completely new hires for us. I meant when you look at Rhules hires for his college career and now in the pros I haven’t seen much offensive development out of him or his staff. Their defenses have always been way ahead of their offenses. We shall see how this year plays out but I’m just going off of his last like 9 years. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • n the ever-evolving landscape of health and wellness, the ketogenic diet has emerged as a popular choice for those seeking to shed excess pounds and improve overall well-being. As people strive to adhere to this low-carb, high-fat regimen, they often explore various supplements to enhance their journey. One such product gaining attention is OEM Keto Gummies in the UK. In this article, we delve into the intricacies of these gummies, exploring their ingredients, benefits, and potential drawbacks. What Are OEM Keto Gummies United Kingdom?                                      Click Here To Buy Now OEM Keto Gummies United Kingdom are a dietary supplement designed to support individuals following a ketogenic diet. These gummies are formulated to provide the body with exogenous ketones, which can help jumpstart ketosis—a metabolic state where the body burns fat for fuel instead of carbohydrates. Unlike traditional gummy candies, OEM Keto Gummies United Kingdom are sugar-free and contain a blend of natural ingredients that are believed to promote ketosis and overall well-being. They are marketed as an easy and enjoyable alternative to traditional keto supplements like pills or powders. In recent years, the ketogenic diet has gained immense popularity for its potential health benefits and weight loss effects. Alongside this trend, a plethora of keto supplements has flooded the market, promising to enhance the diet's results.                                         Click Here To Buy Now OEM Keto Gummies' Advantages: Research indicates that berberine may assist with the following, adding to the enormous and exceptional advantages of Oem Keto Gummies . Promote Heart Prosperity: Research has demonstrated that berberine can promote cardiovascular prosperity by lowering cholesterol, reducing circulatory strain, and improving glucose regulation. Advanced Stomach-related Prosperity: By altering microscopic organisms in the gastrointestinal system, lowering discomfort, and promoting stomach-related capacity, berberine may contribute to the growth of a robust stomach microbiota. What Are The OemKeto Gummies United kingdom Ingredients?‍ As referred toabove, Oem Keto Gummies United kingdom pills are a blend of naturalelements which might be efficient in starting up wholesome weightreduction within the body. Let’s now discuss each of theingredients and the health houses that they possess: Official Website: - https://timesnewscorp.com/oem-keto-gummies-uk-buy/ https://medium.com/@oemketogummiesuk/oem-keto-gummies-australia-uk-0fa2cdc39a71              
    • Sweeps are hard..... I certainly don't expect anything more from them but it would be nice if the caps can take just one.
    • What's more irritating is he's a fugging p*ssy who won't answer the bell and gets the refs protection when people go after him for his antics.
×
×
  • Create New...