Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

3/12/2022 Hurrucanes @ Bruins 7:00 PM EST


Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, Harbingers said:

I’m still fuming over that goal. The first one fine, the ref preemptively blew the whistle, whatever. But Nino definitely hit pure net there on the second. He literally hit the top back side of the net and pure net right next to the pipe before it bounced out. Like are we just not counting goals anymore? 

I would think the league looked at it and there wasn’t enough evidence 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Harbingers said:

They didn’t, they couldn’t if the refs didn’t call it a goal. 

The league looks at it in the HQ during the game. It’s either in Toronto or New York but that’s besides the point.  If they would’ve determined it would’ve been a goal they would’ve communicated to the off ice official to blow the horn that is being looked at. That’s happened a few times this year. Remember game one against the Islanders they put a puck on Freddy and they let the play continue for a couple minutes then the officials blew the horn and stopped the game. The Puck had indeed crossed the line and it was a goal. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Panthers Fan 69 said:

The league looks at it in the HQ during the game. It’s either in Toronto or New York but that’s besides the point.  If they would’ve determined it would’ve been a goal they would’ve communicated to the off ice official to blow the horn that is being looked at. That’s happened a few times this year. Remember game one against the Islanders they put a puck on Freddy and they let the play continue for a couple minutes then the officials blew the horn and stopped the game. The Puck had indeed crossed the line and it was a goal. 

That doesn’t happen during the playoffs, especially when you want that game 7 money. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, panthers81 said:

Which shot was it? I can't find a video of the actual shot. 

I’ll pull the clip in a bit. I posted the still last night. 
 

If you have the replay ability the second intermission is the best camera shots of it on the local broadcast, idk about national. 

Edited by Harbingers
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, PleaseCutStewart said:

Maybe about raanta. That being said, I think most of the goals he has allowed has not been his fault. It's been either terrible defense or unlucky block deflections to the wrong side

Well their ice creates weard pucks. It's also why we have trouble scoring. Lucky for us game 7 is at home. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Snake said:

Well their ice creates weard pucks. It's also why we have trouble scoring. Lucky for us game 7 is at home. 

That ice was trash last night. Holy poo. In terms of skating in the first 20 Boston couldn’t even find their legs. Do they not even level the ice? Boston would have had a goal in the first 5 minutes if that player didn’t hit a rut and literally got taken to a knee while trying to shoot. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, Harbingers said:

That ice was trash last night. Holy poo. In terms of skating in the first 20 Boston couldn’t even find their legs. Do they not even level the ice? Boston would have had a goal in the first 5 minutes if that player didn’t hit a rut and literally got taken to a knee while trying to shoot. 

It's to their advantage though because teams that use speed and precise shots are just stuck in the mud. That allows them to beat the crap out of you for the entire game. 

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Good Lord this board has become a cesspool of negativity and where fandom becomes something twisted and unrecognizable.  
    • Yeah, I could jump right into the unbelievable Bryce debate now that some people are trying to flip the script because Bryce Young has, at most, a handful of decent games as a pro, but that's going to work itself out. Suffice it to say that I've seen better QBs (with an s) in a Panthers uniform, and I've certainly seen better QBs be drafted while we're playing around with Bryce, one of them who beat the crap out of us already this season... Let's forget about Bryce (and his markedly underwhelming play since he's been here); I think that most sane fans will agree that drafting him was an error, but it happens. Sure, it doesn't happen to the tune of King's ransom---including your main receiver---but it happens. You bet, you lose. Speaking of receivers...and betting and losing... Oh, man, we drafted Xavier Legette. Yes, just like with Bryce, I've entered "the dark side." Some Huddlers were telling us from the beginning, and they were right. But, I'm not apologizing for waiting to see what a guy's got before making my decision on him. X was a one-year wonder at South Carolina who parlayed some really nice production that season, a great personality and thick country accent, into becoming a first round pick (but only in Carolina). For Dan Morgan and company, He was a big swing that has turned into a big whiff (and I can still feel the ill breeze from that one). Sh¡t happens, right? Well, not so fast. Ladd McConkey was the decidedly more polished receiver who was literally ready to hit the ground running as soon as stepping onto the field as a pro. Ladd was never the biggest guy (though not the smallest), but he was the guy that could run routes, always seemed to get open---no question---and had the same speed as X, but with legit quickness and nuanced shake and bake. But Dan chose the project. He chose the guy where the game speed looks more like a tractor trailer than a 5.0 mustang. Look, I've supported X (just like Bryce) many many a day, but no more. Now I'm not saying that I won't root for the guy. Just like with Bryce, he seems like a great kid. But as far as giving excuses for the kid, and, perhaps more importantly, waiting for some miraculous breakout, I'm done with that. I've seen enough. You don't draft a project for a project. And yes, Bryce had proven to be a project after his first season. In my mind, drafting a supposedly number one receiver that needs lots of development for a starting quarterback that needs immediate help to try and further his development is not going to lead to good things. Pick the surest guy. Or at least pick the one who appears to be the surest guy, because picking can be tricky... especially when you're too busy tricking yourself. 
    • Winning ain't gonna make my eyes lie to me. Context matters, and it will always matter in the game of football.
×
×
  • Create New...