Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Does Rhule really think he has 5 years?


NAS
 Share

Recommended Posts

21 minutes ago, poundaway said:

So Joe Brady isn't "super talented" anymore?

You've come a long way.

yeah, you really struggle with some very basic concepts. 

Joe Brady is a talented young coach (2019 and 2020 back that thought).  Will he pan out as a NFL OC down the road?  Who knows.  But if you were going to give him a shot in 2020 being a new OC....you would need to have an enviroment where he could have a realistic shot of growing and the O working well while he does that.  Again, the Byron Leftwich example.  His first OC job.....was under a OC/HC AND paired with superstar QB.  Both of who could be heavily involved as he grew. 

If you have a weak NFL HC that was never offensive minded even in college.  He then brings an all college staff with him to the NFL.  You then opt to roll with the worst QB in the NFL.  Give him a bad OL and a rookie RB on top of that?  A talented young OC is going to look like a nightmare by design.  You don't get any answers on what Joe Brady is or isn't given that creation.  Maybe was would have been great.  Maybe he was horrible.  But Matt Rhule's creation in 2021 prohbits anyone from knowing anything about Joe Brady at that point.  All you know for sure is Matt Rhule build a disaster designed to fail in 2021. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, CRA said:

Joe Brady didn't hire himself.   Yet, somehow you don't think that is a Matt Rhule issue and a sign of his incompentence. 

 

So if a Coach makes a mistake, it makes him incompetent? Then there are precious few competent Coaches. Cuz they all make mistake.

 

We get it. You don't like Rhule.  Please don't speak in absolutes. It is childish.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, iamhubby1 said:

 

So if a Coach makes a mistake, it makes him incompetent? Then there are precious few competent Coaches. Cuz they all make mistake.

 

We get it. You don't like Rhule.  Please don't speak in absolutes. It is childish.

a mistake? No. 

A mistake isn't how you would define Matt Rhule though.  We just happen to be talking about one of the many. 

2 years in and there isn't anything you can say Matt Rhule does well.  There is a lot you can say he does poorly.  Which makes him unique.  Everyone else is fired when that is the case.  But we also have a bad owner.  Such is the life currently in Carolina world. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, CRA said:

yeah, you really struggle with some very basic concepts. 

Joe Brady is a talented young coach (2019 and 2020 back that thought).  Will he pan out as a NFL OC down the road?  Who knows.  But if you were going to give him a shot in 2020 being a new OC....you would need to have an enviroment where he could have a realistic shot of growing and the O working well while he does that.  Again, the Byron Leftwich example.  His first OC job.....was under a OC/HC AND paired with superstar QB.  Both of who could be heavily involved as he grew. 

If you have a weak NFL HC that was never offensive minded even in college.  He then brings an all college staff with him to the NFL.  You then opt to roll with the worst QB in the NFL.  Give him a bad OL and a rookie RB on top of that?  A talented young OC is going to look like a nightmare by design.  You don't get any answers on what Joe Brady is or isn't given that creation.  Maybe was would have been great.  Maybe he was horrible.  But Matt Rhule's creation in 2021 prohbits anyone from knowing anything about Joe Brady at that point.  All you know for sure is Matt Rhule build a disaster designed to fail in 2021. 

 

I can see it now. Rhule sitting in his office. He had just gotten the Panther job. HIs first thought was. "How can I build something that is a disaster waiting to happen." lol Your hate is strong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, CRA said:

yeah, you really struggle with some very basic concepts. 

Joe Brady is a talented young coach (2019 and 2020 back that thought).  Will he pan out as a NFL OC down the road?  Who knows.  But if you were going to give him a shot in 2020 being a new OC....you would need to have an enviroment where he could have a realistic shot of growing and the O working well while he does that.  Again, the Byron Leftwich example.  His first OC job.....was under a OC/HC AND paired with superstar QB.  Both of who could be heavily involved as he grew. 

If you have a weak NFL HC that was never offensive minded even in college.  He then brings an all college staff with him to the NFL.  You then opt to roll with the worst QB in the NFL.  Give him a bad OL and a rookie RB on top of that?  A talented young OC is going to look like a nightmare by design.  You don't get any answers on what Joe Brady is or isn't given that creation.  Maybe was would have been great.  Maybe he was horrible.  But Matt Rhule's creation in 2021 prohbits anyone from knowing anything about Joe Brady at that point.  All you know for sure is Matt Rhule build a disaster designed to fail in 2021. 

There's always a confluence of factors in trying to evaluate a coach or player.  It applies to everyone.  

On this message board, despite the factors, we still make judgements.  In the end, you are what your record is. 

Joe Brady was a horrible OC and Matt Rhule is a bad coach. That may change for Brady.  I don't care.  I really don't.  He works for the Titans now.  Unlike you, I hope it changes for Rhule, because, he's our coach.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, CRA said:

a mistake? No. 

A mistake isn't how you would define Matt Rhule though.  We just happen to be talking about one of the many. 

2 years in and there isn't anything you can say Matt Rhule does well.  There is a lot you can say he does poorly.  Which makes him unique.  Everyone else is fired when that is the case.  But we also have a bad owner.  Such is the life currently in Carolina world. 

 

Spin that crap boyyo. You hate Rhule. NOTHING anyone says will change that. It has become a challenge to nitpick everything you say that contradicts yourself.

 

A coach with 2 years experience is not good enough for you. Every perceived mistake is take to the nth degree with you. 

 

Don't feel bad. You are not alone.

 

Edit to add; There are so many exciting things going on. And you are stuck in this loop. Fug Rhule, fug Tepper, rinse and repeat.

 

Come join the excitement. It is better for your soul than all this hand wringing negativity.

Edited by iamhubby1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, iamhubby1 said:

 

I can see it now. Rhule sitting in his office. He had just gotten the Panther job. HIs first thought was. "How can I build something that is a disaster waiting to happen." lol Your hate is strong.

I mean that's not what incomptent people do.  They think there bad ideas will work. 

Another example would be thinking the worst starter in the NFL over the past 3 seasons should be acquired for tons of draft captial (on a rebuilding team) and made to be THE guy. lol.  I'm sure Matt Rhule actually thought that was a great idea and would work.  But Matt isn't good at his job.  Therefore his good ideas.....are often very bad. 

I think he thought his all college staff was a great idea, and go heavy Temple/Baylor, punting from the oppoents 30 and so on.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, poundaway said:

There's always a confluence of factors in trying to evaluate a coach or player.  It applies to everyone.  

On this message board, despite the factors, we still make judgements.  In the end, you are what your record is. 

Joe Brady was a horrible OC and Matt Rhule is a bad coach. That may change for Brady.  I don't care.  I really don't.  He works for the Titans now.  Unlike you, I hope it changes for Rhule, because, he's our coach.

I don't spend my days wishing for Sam Darnold to be good.  Or Matt Rhule.  We already know the answers to such. 

 Matt Corral? Yeah, I hope he is good. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, CRA said:

I mean that's not what incomptent people do.  They think there bad ideas will work. 

Another example would be thinking the worst starter in the NFL over the past 3 seasons should be acquired for tons of draft captial (on a rebuilding team) and made to be THE guy. lol.  I'm sure Matt Rhule actually thought that was a great idea and would work.  But Matt isn't good at his job.  Therefore his good ideas.....are often very bad. 

I think he thought his all college staff was a great idea, and go heavy Temple/Baylor, punting from the oppoents 30 and so on.

 

 

 

Slow walking Defensive rotations to get Delay of Game penalties.

Taking a Defense that couldn't get off the field. To one of the better Defenses in the league.

Taking a team bereft of talent. And turning into one of the best rosters we have seen in a while.

 

It is not all doom and gloom. But one would never know by reading your posts.

 

Edit to add; And putting IMO, or I think, in your posts does not make them any truer. It does not add any credence to your words.

 

For example; "I think you are overly negative" 

Edited by iamhubby1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, poundaway said:

This statement does not apply to OC and you know it. 

Ok.  If it "happens all the time", name one.  Name one current OC who's immediate previous position was a college coach, let alone a non-OC college coach. 
 

You think Brady is the only OC whose prior job was as a college coach?

Eeehhh, no. It's actually not unusual for college coaches who get pro head coaching jobs to bring their staff with them. Mind you, college coaches don't get pro jobs as often as they used to (our own Matt Rhule is pretty good evidence as to why).

As far as right now, the closest you'd find to that would be Steelers OC Matt Canada who spent just one year as their QB coach before ascending to OC. All his experience prior to that was at the college level.

Buy while we're at it, you might want to check your premise here. Are you absolutely certain that college coaching is the only thing Joe Brady had done before getting the Panthers job?

(might wanna check his bio) 😆

  • The D 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, iamhubby1 said:

Well that was sure entertaining.

At least it was fairly civil. Except for Mr. Scot insulting folks that is.

Eeehhh, could be worse.

I could be the kinda guy who just stops by occasionally antagonizing people with dumbass arguments just to be an a--hole.

Now that would be pathetic.

  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't need that many words to say Bryce Young has not yet surpassed the caliber of QB play that current Joe Flacco represents.   I have watched every game Bryce has played.  He doesn't give you average QB play.   He can't make a ton of throws.  Bryce is consistent overall in what he is.  You can take outlier games on both ends of the spectrum out of play and judge him or any QB.....for Bryce it is unquestioned bottom of the league play.  All you have to do is watch the two play.  Flacco is good enough that if you can keep up right and give him time.....he presents a level of play Bryce can't do as a passer  
    • Not sure.  Which ones have more GWDs in the same time frame?
    • You kinda gloss over this, but this is really at the crux of this whole argument....which Flacco are we talking here?  You bring up that he played with 3 different teams but ignore the fact that his performance varied quite a bit from team to team. 2024 Colts: 65.3% completion, 12 TDs, 7 INTs, 220.1 YPG, 7.1 Y/A, 90.5 rating 2025 Browns: 58.1% completion, 2 TDs, 6 INTs, 203.8 YPG, 5.1 Y/A, 60.3 rating 2025 Bengals: 63.4% completion, 12 TDs, 3 INTs, 290.6 YPG, 6.8 Y/A, 96.2 rating 2025 Flacco (Browns + Bengals): 61.1% completion, 14 TDs, 9 INTs, 252.0 YPG, 6.1 Y/A, 80.8 rating vs. 2025 Bryce: 62.7% completion, 14 TDs, 7 INTs, 196.2 YPG, 6.2 Y/A, 86.0 rating I bolded the comparison that I think objectively makes the most sense...just simply comparing the two QBs for the entire season.  Otherwise you'd be cherry-picking Flacco's time with the Bengals and ignoring his earlier stint with the Browns, which sounds an awful lot like people cherry-picking Bryce's stats in the second half of last season. So again, which Flacco?  Basically the only thing consistent with Flacco across each of these teams was his W/L records: 2-4, 1-3, and 1-4 respectively.  I'd say if we're comparing each version of him to Bryce this year: Colts Flacco > 2025 Bryce, Browns Flacco <<< 2025 Bryce, Bengals Flacco >> 2025 Bryce, and 2025 Flacco < 2025 Bryce - Flacco this year only beats out Bryce on YPG but in part because he throws significantly more passes (almost 60 YPG more than Bryce, despite a lower Y/A which is pretty telling) .  Flacco is maybe the most apt case study about how important a QB's circumstances are to his success.  He was easily a bottom 3 QB in Cleveland and arguably top 10-15 in Cincinnati...and we're talking about the same player from the same season.  All that happened was taking him from one team and plopping him onto another team; nothing inherently changed about him as a QB.  Funny enough I think that's all that one dude on here was trying to say when he made that long poorly-received post after having an epiphany working for PFF behind the scenes or w/e.  That it's largely short-sighted to just try to evaluate QBs in a vacuum when there are so many variables at play that ultimately decide whether a QB is successful or not.   I think Bryce has been mediocre at best this season and I'm ready to move on regardless of how he ends this season - I'm highly skeptical a strong end to the season will carry over into next year considering how last year ended and this year began.  I would certainly agree that he's a bottom-third QB this year.  I just don't understand you scoffing indignantly at anyone holding the opinion that Bryce has had a better season than Flacco...I can only assume it's recency bias.  Or maybe you know the stats don't support you, which is why you're conjuring up the god-forsaken arbitrary "eyeball test" which is the kinda thing people in here were saying about Fields for years, pinky promising that he really truly was a franchise QB despite his awful stats.  Perhaps it's called the eyeball test because I roll my eyes anytime I hear someone bring it up seriously as an argument.
×
×
  • Create New...