Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

REPORT: Steve Reed reports "the Panthers are still interested in" Jimmy Garoppolo


Recommended Posts

18 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

There are several. Here's one:

Back when Brady was a free agent two years ago he wanted to join up with the 49ers. They were his first choice before the Buccaneers ended up winning his favor. Alas, the 49ers elected not to pursue Brady after consideration. They decided that sticking with Jimmy Garoppolo, fresh off of a Super Bowl appearance, was the best move for them going forward. 

SI.com

It's one reason why many believe the "y'all are gonna stick with that motherf--ker" comment was referencing the 49ers and Garoppolo.

So we have an opportunity to get a QB that the 9ers considered better than Brady?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, poundaway said:

What does that fuging matter?

Why does it matter?  They were no longer interested in playing for their teams so they traded them for a return while they could.  Why would a team want a QB playing for them that isn't interested?  That's much different than a team telling a QB in his prime, they are no longer interested in him playing for their franchise and trying to trade him (with no results so far).  That's basically what we did with Teddy.  Do you think the Lions or Seahawks would have traded 3 first rounders to move up and take a QB then randomly put Stafford/Russ on the trade block?  ESPN and us fans would be so confused.  The Niners did it and no one batted an eye because we all know Jimmy G was their weakness.  Elite defense, strong running game and then your QB keeps throwing INTs in the playoffs.  Hmmm what can they do to make this team better???

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

There are several. Here's one:

Back when Brady was a free agent two years ago he wanted to join up with the 49ers. They were his first choice before the Buccaneers ended up winning his favor. Alas, the 49ers elected not to pursue Brady after consideration. They decided that sticking with Jimmy Garoppolo, fresh off of a Super Bowl appearance, was the best move for them going forward. 

SI.com

It's one reason why many believe the "y'all are gonna stick with that motherf--ker" comment was referencing the 49ers and Garoppolo.

From your article:

While it was never totally clear who he referenced, you can't rule out that he was talking about Garoppolo and the 49ers since they were ones Brady was looking to sign at.

This is an opinion piece written by 9ers beat reporter addressing the rumors that Brady is considering coming out of retirement for the 9ers. He has no sources with Brady, and no evidence and admits that he doesn't know.  In fact he went on to write:

Ultimately, I believe Brady is done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, poundaway said:

So we have an opportunity to get a QB that the 9ers considered better than Brady?

Yeah the NIners picked "that motherf******" and the following year were trading up in the draft to replace him while Brady won a championship.  We had an opportunity to sign Mitch, a QB that the Bears drafted over Mahomes and Watson.  These are mistakes made by teams...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, poundaway said:

Cause they're good.  Ask Green Bay.

Are you talking about before or after they held an emergency meeting with the front office and Rodgers, restructured his contract, gave him the input he had been wanting then signed him to a huge contract he was wanting?  That's just GB making it right and giving him what he wanted.  Rodgers wants to be there now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

Are you talking about before or after they held an emergency meeting with the front office and Rodgers, restructured his contract, gave him the input he had been wanting then signed him to a huge contract he was wanting?  That's just GB making it right and giving him what he wanted.  Rodgers wants to be there now.

Very good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, poundaway said:

I'm confused.  I thought teams didn't make mistakes and if we can get JimmyG its because he sucks.

JimmyG>>>>Sam.  We will win more games with Jimmy. 

You thought teams didn't make mistakes?  Jimmy G isn't that good and that's why he is STILL available and the Niners have been so eager to replace him.  Jimmy is better than Sam.  I agree with you there.  We can sign Foles right now as a FA who is better than Sam.  That's an extremely low bar to have...  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

You thought teams didn't make mistakes? 

No you do.  The 9ers overpaid for Lance and are now committed to him as their starting QB.  Jimmy wants to start so they're going to let him go. 

Jimmy was 9th in PR (ahead of Mahomes) and 13th in QBR (one spot behind Burrow) last year.  Hes a good QB.  Sam is not.

We win more games with Jimmy.

  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, poundaway said:

No you do.  The 9ers overpaid for Lance and are now committed to him as their starting QB.  Jimmy wants to start so they're going to let him go. 

Jimmy was 9th in PR (ahead of Mahomes) and 13th in QBR (one spot behind Burrow) last year.  Hes a good QB.  Sam is not.

We win more games with Jimmy.

Preach 🙌...

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, poundaway said:

No you do.  The 9ers overpaid for Lance and are now committed to him as their starting QB.  Jimmy wants to start so they're going to let him go. 

Jimmy was 9th in PR (ahead of Mahomes) and 13th in QBR (one spot behind Burrow) last year.  Hes a good QB.  Sam is not.

We win more games with Jimmy.

If you think he is good that’s your opinion. I’ve seen him when his running game isn’t going and they need to use his arm and it’s gets bad. Check those stats for the postseason and watch what happens to them. It’s easy to dink and dunk when you have a great defense and the running game is going great. When they needed his arm he isn’t able to get the job done. It’s very similar to Teddy with the Vikings. I’d rather roll with Corral and if he isn’t the answer then draft one next year. If you want to try to trade for or sign another team’s cast off for the 3rd year in a row, then hopefully 3rd times a charm. I just don’t see it…

QBR has Tannehill and Wentz in the top 10 over him. These guys are behind great running offenses. When the games on the line they have proven they can’t get it done. 

Edited by ForJimmy
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jimmy G - Average Intended Air Yards per pass attempt 

2021- 29th

2020 - 40th

2019 - 37th 

He is the king of checkdown offense.  It’s why the 49ers gave up 3 first round picks for a Trey Lance.  If Jimmy G was good….Trey Lance wouldn’t be in SF.  Especially not for 3 first round picks. 

We could of just kept Teddy this entire time.  Saved a bunch of draft picks.  

  • Pie 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...