Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Game #4 Canes vs Rangers 7pm Puck Drop


Recommended Posts

49 minutes ago, MillionDollarCam said:

I mean the kid did beat New York to clinch the division on the road so I’d give him a go.

I’m still not understanding why He was benched after a loss in Boston.  Maybe it’s the language barrier or I just still don’t understand hockey, but I thought the kid played great on the whole. 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, TheCandyMan said:

I’m still not understanding why He was benched after a loss in Boston.  Maybe it’s the language barrier or I just still don’t understand hockey, but I thought the kid played great on the whole. 

You’re guess is good as mine, he definitely seemed to be on a short leash.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Raanta is tired.

I would like Freddie back, but not if it is too soon.  I also worry about shaking off the rust.

TDA hasn't been the same since he got injured.  He isn't posing the offensive threat he did earlier in the year.

All the talk of the Canes can't win on the road has gotten into the player's heads.  They have to rise above all the noise.

I'll say it time and again, the Canes have to beat the team in front of them and the refs.  The NHL wants a TB/NYR ECF.....people can believe what they want, but more viewers from large/rabid fanbase markets makes Bettman and the NHL happy.

#LetsGoCanes

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The entire OP is about the play calling and results and only mentioned T-Mac one time, in the sense of our offensive struggles only made me more frustrated about our #1 WR only getting a single 2nd half target in a game we were behind for the majority of it. How is that showing my true colors? It's way more of other people reading too much into it and thinking this is all and only about T-Mac for me, but it's not.  He just happens to be the player that I specifically was upset by his 2nd half usage, but it had nothing to do with my personal feelings towards him, but that he's our only legitimate WR and he had a single target in the 2nd half after going for 73 yards in the first. To me, that is a very legitimate play calling gripe, the win or particular player aside.
    • Dowdle looked great. Watching him made this game alot of fun.  
    • We’re stuck with Bryce for now.  He led TWO drives where we came from behind to take the lead. One of them was the winning drive and he threw the winning TD. Taken as a whole…he played at expectation after the 1st quarter. That’s not so bad under the circumstances.  We got the win. Maybe they’ll struggle to build on it but a win is a win. He drove the offense down and took the lead when it was needed. You can’t take that away from him.    We’re not changing QBs anytime soon.  Or owners.  So…when they win, we should take it at face value and give credit where it’s due.  Bryce came up big in clutch moments. You can’t take that away from him.
×
×
  • Create New...