Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Joe Person and The 33rd Team break down the Mayfield trade


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

24 minutes ago, rippadonn said:

McAdoo was in the room.

 

First of all, if you are referring to the draft room, he wasn't.  

Second, to think that McAdoo  had heavy input on the QB in the draft but no input on the QB in FA fits with the Qanon Huddle theory of all things bad come from Rhule and all things good come from everywhere else.  Its Rhule Derangement Syndrome.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Former Eagles team President Joe Banner believes the Panthers should have gone ahead and signed Mayfield to a one-year extension.

I'd guess the Darnold experience probably prevented that from happening.

I actually believe that the Panthers, who had one of the league’s best defenses in the league in 2021 (in terms of yards allowed) as well as an underrated receiving corps and a rebuilt offensive line, could find themselves in the playoffs this season with a healthy Mayfield at the helm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BrianS said:

That's a pop fly man.

The 49ers traded three 1st round picks and a 3rd round pick for Trey Lance and paid JimmyG around $26 million last year.  They also gave up a 2nd round pick for JimmyG when he was acquired.  Pretty steep.

Yeh but Jimmy G was serviceable for a few years I guess and Lance is the future 

feels like panthers throwing darts at a board. 
 

49ers had a clear plan 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

Carolina can now have the view of winning more games with Baker and in 2-3 years acquire a talented young QB to insert into a winning team. 

Displaying that "we'll get 'em next year" (or maybe two or three years down the road) attitude is something Panthers fans are very accustomed to.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, poundaway said:

First of all, if you are referring to the draft room, he wasn't.  

Second, to think that McAdoo  had heavy input on the QB in the draft but no input on the QB in FA fits with the Qanon Huddle theory of all things bad come from Rhule and all things good come from everywhere else.  Its Rhule Derangement Syndrome.

Where have you been? McAdoo wasn't in the draft room?! McAdoo didn't help make up the big board? McAdoo didn't interview and spend time with Corral? Lies.

Yes he was. There is no such thing as Qanon by the way. There is Q. There are anons. Get that correct before correcting. 

And Rhule IS actually a losing coach who hasn't done a good job. There is no derangement there. It's ok you can blame Russia, Russia, Russia when you fail to make a political point outside the tinderbox.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, rippadonn said:

Where have you been? McAdoo wasn't in the draft room?! McAdoo didn't help make up the big board? McAdoo didn't interview and spend time with Corral? Lies.

Yes he was. There is no such thing as Qanon by the way. There is Q. There are anons. Get that correct before correcting. 

And Rhule IS actually a losing coach who hasn't done a good job. There is no derangement there. It's ok you can blame Russia, Russia, Russia when you fail to make a political point outside the tinderbox.

McAdoo did interview Corral and help make the board.  But when we were drafting, where the rubber hits the road and  you actually have to play the board to get the QB, he wasn't there.

QAnon is a conspiracy theory in existence so get that right before you correct a correction.

Rhule is a losing coach.  But he oversaw the good FA, draft and coach hires as well as the bad ones.  He collaborated on drafting Corral and bringing in Baker and Sam.
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's honestly pretty interesting just seeing this pairing play out. Canales’ offenses (Seattle, Tampa) are run-first, under-center, play-action systems built around defined reads and intermediate/deep timing throws. That structure worked when he had QBs like Baker Mayfield or Russell Wilson in a system that created clear launch points and sightlines. His success has always been tied to a credible run game + play-action gravity. You can see that with the Panthers team building philosophy as well. Coker and TMac both are bigger receivers that won't get the best YAC production but thrive as possession receivers in contested scenarios. They're not the best in space and creating additional yardage in such, and would likely fair better systematically with a stronger armed QB who can create better opportunities on those boundary 1v1 matchups with stronger throws. Bryce, on the other hand, is a spread-native QB. His strengths are rhythm, spacing, quick processing, and off-script creation. Asking him to live in condensed formations with long-developing play-action concepts just hasn't been his forte. And well, his boundary throws are limited in velocity which takes a big chunk of the playbook off. And I mean a QB like Bryce can still work, it's just Dave's offensive philosophy and foundation is very much at odds with Young's physical limits and his own experience. So it's certainly still a learning experience for Dave to figure out how he can mesh his offensive philosophy with Young's strengths. He's very inexperienced with maximizing Bryce's strengths with his system. Would love to see us bring in an OC with spread experience and adaptability to implement a cohesive system with Dave to allow Bryce to thrive, as it's obvious we're sticking with him for a bit longer.   
    • Only thing I really agreed with is questioning why we didn’t take any timeouts on their last drive.  I know hindsight is 20/20, but I think it would’ve saved clock bc they were desperate to score as soon as the opportunity presented itself, but I also think it could’ve helped the defense regroup and maybe give us a better chance to stop them.
×
×
  • Create New...