Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Article on why we should cut Darnold….am I wrong for being against this??


WarPanthers89
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, CRA said:

I don’t disagree that Sam is better today.  But he is pointless in the long term and short term.  I’m merely prioritizing Corral developing and getting better and more reps over Sam.  Because regardless of what Sam is owed there is no point to him.  There is one to Corral getting work and opportunity.  More learning opportunity as the 2. 

I want the guy with the best chance to win. That means the guy who plays the best. I am tired of losing week in and week out. Last year we won 2 games at home. That really sucks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

Despite what his salary is---if that is the only reason you keep him on board---a roster spot is worth something.  However, with 3 unproven QBs on the roster, you probably need all of them.

For better or worse, Baker and Darnold have been in the league long enough to be proven.  Corral is the unproven one.  

IMO, I keep Darnold because he is a cap hit, and cap space is worth something to.   And there may come a point this season where we need a third stringer, and Darnold would be acceptable as our third string qb imo.  

But I would be tempted to force him to do kick coverage or something like that. 

😉  j/k of course.

 

Edited by Davidson Deac II
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • T-Mac is a nickname, Tet is a shortening of Tetairoa. Like you said below... your name is Jonathan, I could see "Jonny" being considered a nickname, but Jon isn't a nickname, it's a shortening of Johnathan, see the difference? And if your mom named you Jonathan for it's biblical significance/meaning, because she was very religious, I think it would be different. T-Mac is Polynesian, so much in their culture has deeper meaning for them, particularly names.  So for his mom to feel this way, I highly doubt it's just because she likes the name Tetairoa and not Tet, it's much more likely than not to be because the name itself has a deeper meaning in their culture.   Particularly as T-Mac himself has often talked about how much his Polynesian heritage means to himself and his family. And no, I'm not saying all this because of how much he's my guy, if he was just "normal american" and his name was Jonathan and he didn't like fans calling him Jon, I'd probably just say tough poo.  It's that he's Polynesian and I know things like names have a much deeper meaning in their culture than they do in ours for the most part. For whatever it's worth, a quick google search.......
    • All that mess for a solid 6. Come on Bill do better
    • never stick your d*ck in crazy, c'mon Bill.
×
×
  • Create New...