Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Hornets Looking At Bringing Back Kemba Walker or Isaiah Thomas


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, MechaZain said:

He was brought in to replace Rozier bro using a lottery pick on LaMelo's backup would have been a waste. 

There's no plan though. We paid both Rozier and Martin. Mitch is going down the same path that got him sent packing from the Lakers.

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, frankw said:

There's no plan though. We paid both Rozier and Martin. Mitch is going down the same path that got him sent packing from the Lakers.

Yep, agree with all this. Really have no idea what our plan is with our young guys. We always seem to sign players over them.

Rozier’s new deal starts next year, and it’s a hefty deal to say the least.

The Hornets will probably let Oubre walk next year and slide Martin to SF to be the backup for whoever is manning that position… but once again, this year is another wasted year where the only minutes Bouknight are getting are in Greensboro.

Edited by MillionDollarCam
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Carl Spackler said:

In this case the Hornets let Bouknight 1.0 walk in FA so Bouknight 2.0 could do the same things.

That’s just being a poor manger of your assets though. At some point you have to get something for these players before letting them walk for nothing. Monk had the best year of his career last year and the Hornets have nothing to show for it. If they do the same with Bouknight then at some point the fans need to question what the plan is with our young guys.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MillionDollarCam said:

That’s just being a poor manger of your assets though. At some point you have to get something for these players before letting them walk for nothing. Monk had the best year of his career last year and the Hornets have nothing to show for it. If they do the same with Bouknight then at some point the fans need to question what the plan is with our young guys.

I’m hoping the plan is to stop drafting high-volume, undersized 2-guards who won’t play defense, honestly. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, frankw said:

There's no plan though. We paid both Rozier and Martin. Mitch is going down the same path that got him sent packing from the Lakers.

They can coexist. Cody's a solid defender who can play 1-3 but he's not a shooter, he's depth. If he spends a significant portion of his time at the 2 we're in trouble. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, MechaZain said:

They can coexist. Cody's a solid defender who can play 1-3 but he's not a shooter, he's depth. If he spends a significant portion of his time at the 2 we're in trouble. 

 

If Kemba is brought back then Cody isn’t playing the 1. He did that at times last year when guys had injuries or covid but that all but stopped as soon as IT came in.

So you have five guys (Rozier, Martin, Hayward, Oubre, and Bouknight) for four rotational spots… the odd man out is Bouknight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, Cam Lawter said:

Why are we always benching our 1st round picks or trading them away. I like Cody but damn, we don't even get to see the potential of Bouk and I highly doubt we'll see much of Williams. Don't even get me started on Duren since we are without Bridges now

It’s the Hornet way. They had rather play veterans to be mediocre verses being complete trash but letting the kids develop. Lottery picks are for suckers....Hornets moto. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Wanderlai said:

It’s the Hornet way. They had rather play veterans to be mediocre verses being complete trash but letting the kids develop. Lottery picks are for suckers....Hornets moto

Trading them for second round picks and then keeping those second round players over the lottery picks that we do have seems to be the game plan.

I just don’t understand the whole Martin contract… give Bouknight a chance to develop and if he doesn’t then draft another defensive two guard next year to replace him and move him out for some sort of compensation.

The Hornets asset managing is astounding.

Edited by MillionDollarCam
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cody Martin and James Bouknight are polar opposites as players. Martin doesn't have explosiveness, nor the lateral quickness and shot-creating ability Bouknight has, but Bouknight possesses 0% of Martin's defensive intensity, desire and ability to close out on wings. Having one does not preclude a team from having both. 

If Bouknight will ever consider trying on defense, he'll be in a far better spot. Playing players based on draft position is not the smartest thing, unless you want to field a college team in the NBA who'll bite and foul on every pump fake, get beat backdoor like nobody's business, and take 65 stepback threes every game. You do, in fact, need people who play defense, like Martin and Mark Williams.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, Carl Spackler said:

Cody Martin and James Bouknight are polar opposites as players. Martin doesn't have explosiveness, nor the lateral quickness and shot-creating ability Bouknight has, but Bouknight possesses 0% of Martin's defensive intensity, desire and ability to close out on wings. Having one does not preclude a team from having both. 

If Bouknight will ever consider trying on defense, he'll be in a far better spot. Playing players based on draft position is not the smartest thing, unless you want to field a college team in the NBA who'll bite and foul on every pump fake, get beat backdoor like nobody's business, and take 65 stepback threes every game. You do, in fact, need people who play defense, like Martin and Mark Williams.

That’s fine but don’t waste your assets on the bench and let them walk for nothing when the time comes. Gary Payton is just as good of a player as Martin and probably the closest comparison that there is to Martin in the NBA and Golden State will be replacing him with Moody next year. Moody was selected two spots after Bouknight. Point being you eventually have to let the guys you draft try. If you don’t then it’s a revolving door of young players that you lose for nothing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, MillionDollarCam said:

That’s fine but don’t waste your assets on the bench and let them walk for nothing when the time comes. Gary Payton is just as good of a player as Martin and probably the closest comparison that there is to Martin in the NBA and Golden State will be replacing him with Moody next year. Moody was selected two spots after Bouknight. Point being you eventually have to let the guys you draft try. If you don’t then it’s a revolving door of young players that you lose for nothing.

I get that, but I'm not very optimistic that Bouknight will turn out to be someone who'll make you forget Cody Martin. He's probably destined to be an eighth-man microwave to use when you're down 12 and he'll either shoot you back into it, or build the deficit to 25.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Didn't  see this posted (since 2023) but since folks have been posting that you can't judge a draft class for three years (a ridiculous take), I thought I'd post this to see what people thought about the 2023 draft. Unfortunately this may not be the most interesting class to do this with but I do quite like retrospective draft grades. Would appreciate other's takes on this (and other recent) draft classes.   1(1) - Bryce Young QB: I am a bigger Bryce Young apologist than most (maybe all). I like the kid. But there is no way around it: This was a terrible pick. If he had been picked in the 4th or even the 3rd round I would feel pretty good about it. But this was the first overall pick that we gave up two firsts, our best offensive player to get.  GRADE: C -    2(39) - Jonathan Mingo WR: not much to say here here. He was here for two years. His yards per catch are on par with Bryce's yards per pass. Rough stuff. To date he has still never scored a touchdown in the NFL GRADE: F   3(80) - DJ Johnson OLB: a pick I hated as soon as it happened and an example of why the premise of this thread is honestly dumb. This was a bad pick when it happened. Most people knew it.  Then came training camp and he did not look good. Then came the preseason which confirmed what we saw in TC. Then came the season which confirmed what we saw in preseason. To date, he has half a sack in his career. GRADE: F 4 (114) Chandlers Zavala G: Honestly the best pick of this draft which really speaks to how awful this draft is. Other than Bryce, the only pick still on the team. He is mostly average or below average depth which in round 4 is not terrible. But he had a pff score of 43.5 and though I think people have unrealistic expectations for draft picks, I still would want a little more from a fourth round pick GRADE: C+   5 (145) - Jammie Robinson S: I liked the pick when it happened but ended up being a disappointment. He logged 1 tackle with the falcons last year and not enough snaps to get a grade on PFF.  GRADE: F OVERALL DRAFT GRADE: F  
    • You gonna make me post Stank before every game?  I kid, I kid. 
    • Final Avs 9 Wild 6. Defense never entered the building lol.
×
×
  • Create New...