Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rhule on practice reps


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Tr3ach said:

If Corral starts this year then we are going to be in the running for a top 3 pick.  Care to take a guess what position they would probably draft in that scenario? 

My point exactly earlier in this thread.  Corral starting would be a disaster and ensure we draft a 1st rounder at QB who would then likely take his spot. His best scenario is sit and learn.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, panthers55 said:

You should know that every team does what they think is best for them. And that every year is completely different with different players and staff.  Feel free to ask the old guy or email Rhule to see the rationale. My point in this thread has been simply to point out what seems obvious to me that others seemed so confused about. You can argue you hate the plan but clearly there is one.

No, teams do not spend a lot of draft capital on a qb and instantly delegate them to the 4rth string and not give them a chance to get better.   atl, pitt, skins, Ne and even miami are not doing that

 

But keep making excuses its pretty comical at this point

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, panthers55 said:

My point exactly earlier in this thread.  Corral starting would be a disaster and ensure we draft a 1st rounder at QB who would then likely take his spot. His best scenario is sit and learn.

People are advocating that he be set up to learn…..just like teams are doing with other draft picks that they  also aren’t planning to start. 

If the roster is going to be Baker/Sam/Corral. What is the point of spitting starter reps and robbing Baker of the amount he needs….and letting Sam/PJ rob Corral of the amount he needs to grow behind the scenes. 

 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, panthers55 said:

If he is the backup as you advocate then any injury to the starter makes him the starter.

thats not quite the same as what we are saying but good try

 

also how do you know with more reps and better coaching he couldnt be the backup?  Do you think the skins, pitt or NE would freak out if their rookies had to play?  Based on the past games I seriously doubt it, they somehow got their guys ready

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CRA said:

People are advocating that he be set up to learn…..just like teams are doing with other draft picks that they  also aren’t planning to start. 

If the roster is going to be Baker/Sam/Corral. What is the point of spitting starter reps and robbing Baker of the amount he needs….and letting Sam/PJ rob Corral of the amount he needs to grow behind the scenes. 

 

Its frustrating he is either trolling or truly doesnt get it

 

either one is bad

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, panthers55 said:

If he is the backup as you advocate then any injury to the starter makes him the starter.

I think most here concede Corral would be 3rd.  Not the backup.  

The highest cap hit on the roster will be the backup once the charade runs its course. 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, mrcompletely11 said:

No, teams do not spend a lot of draft capital on a qb and instantly delegate them to the 4rth string and not give them a chance to get better.   atl, pitt, skins, Ne and even miami are not doing that

 

But keep making excuses its pretty comical at this point

It doesn't matter if he's relegated to 4th string. The fact he was drafted was all that needed to be said. PJ isn't the answer as a backup. If he was, there was no need to draft MC. If SD was the answer, there would have been no need to trade for Baker. So what we have is a traded for starter, a traded for draft QB, a bust starting QB and a QB that was replaced in the draft. The FO has already affirmed what everyone in the NFL and fans with common sense knows. Darnold isn't a starter and PJ is replaceable. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, mrcompletely11 said:

No, teams do not spend a lot of draft capital on a qb and instantly delegate them to the 4rth string and not give them a chance to get better.   atl, pitt, skins, Ne and even miami are not doing that

 

But keep making excuses its pretty comical at this point

I assume McAdoo is competent  and can develop QBs. So if Corral is only getting so many reps it is for a reason. If you don't believe in McAdoo then nothing will make sense.  And I am simply explaining what is happening not trying to defend anyone. From what I have read and seen our offense is improved  and while that could change if we start really sucking, I am fine with how McAdoo is running the offense. But I want to win and prefer vets to rookies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rhule needs to read this and figure out a plan

 

How is it that Willis, the biggest project in the draft coming from a gimmick college system has worked himself from 3rd string to 2nd?   Now are you guys really saying MC is a bigger project then willis?

 

its like magic, the more they give Willis the better he is getting.  Amazing how that works

 

Just like with pickett, both had some bad weeks in training camp but the team had a plan to get them up to speed.  I cannot say the same thing for dumb dumb rhule

 

https://titanswire.usatoday.com/2022/08/04/malik-willis-titans-qbs-coach-assessment/

Edited by mrcompletely11
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, panthers55 said:

I assume McAdoo is competent  and can develop QBs. So if Corral is only getting so many reps it is for a reason. If you don't believe in McAdoo then nothing will make sense.  And I am simply explaining what is happening not trying to defend anyone. From what I have read and seen our offense is improved  and while that could change if we start really sucking, I am fine with how McAdoo is running the offense. But I want to win and prefer vets to rookies.

Has McAdoo developed a QB? 

Has Rhule ever had good QB play? 

it’s a hard sell IMO that they shouldn’t be questioned.  With both having a past of nonsense and mismanagement.   And they clearly are struggling right now with some easy calls IMO. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, CRA said:

People are advocating that he be set up to learn…..just like teams are doing with other draft picks that they  also aren’t planning to start. 

If the roster is going to be Baker/Sam/Corral. What is the point of spitting starter reps and robbing Baker of the amount he needs….and letting Sam/PJ rob Corral of the amount he needs to grow behind the scenes. 

 

Seems we have covered this already. You need 2 guys who can start in this league since both Baker and Sam missed games last year. And Corral is getting what he can handle. You need to be on the sidelines until you know what to do when you get on the field. The hype was great physicals but didn't operate in a prostyle offense.. They are doing him a favor bringing him along slowly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I thought he had a few really nice flashes.  I can see him showing out this year 
    • I have heard that before--when standing in front of a full body mirror at Old Navy.  I said it, actually. Seriously, Let's go on what we know. There is reason for optimism that exceeds random opinions and negativity: 1. Last year, the offense was the priority and the interior offensive line was the focal point. Morgan addressed it in free agency and the draft. They improved.  2.  Last year, Canales pulled Young after 2 games and replaced him with an established veteran.  Instead of giving up on Young, he developed him, primarily focusing on his footwork and timing.  Continued development in his fundamentals should result in improved play.  (this is significant because some athletes rely on natural ability and do not adapt well.  They resort to old habits. This means that Bryce is "teachable" and is willing to face adversity and fight through it.  That is what you want in a QB.) 3. Morgan drafted a raw talent at WR; and we all knew he was raw.  Huddlers are already calling it a bust, but his productivity numbers were in line with the other WRs drafted around where he was drafted.  So, yes, he was a bit disappointing, but what part of "Raw" is not understood here?  Evil Bryce, then inconsistent Dalton, then good Bryce--all while facing the top defensive backs--and let's not forget about his lingering injuries--and we should understand XL's productivity.  Morgan was looking for a home run based on XL's 1-season productivity and his freakish athleticism, but I always thought we would not know what we have until year 2.  TMac alone will make XL better--a solid #2. 4.  If you blame Morgan for drafting XL, you must give him credit for making Coker a priority free agent.  In my view, he addressed WR in 2024 pretty effectively in the long view.  5.  Let's look at the rest of the draft.  Brooks?  The best RB in the draft in round 2?  Morgan was attempting to build a solid run game behind Bryce.  Wallace was a very solid third round pick at LB. Sanders is a strong TE for a fourth round pick. 6.  Not much is being said about the development of Chau Smith-Wade.  His improvement mirrors Bryce Young's, actually.  In his first 8 games, his PFF rating was 36.5.  In the final 9 games, his PFF rating was 66.7.   7.  With so many needs, Morgan hit the UDFA market with success. In addition to Coker, Demani Richardson got 400+ snaps and had a 60.1 PFF grade, including an interception. 8.  In free agency, Morgan spent big bucks on Guards, a move that made his QB better. He added David Moore, Nijman,  He signed Clowney, Wonnum, Robinson, Jewel, Chaisson, Fuller, Scott, D. Jackson, Dionte Johnson, etc.  A few years of Fitterer left him with more holes that players.  Some did not work out, but he did all this on a budget (after he splurged on Lewis and Hunt).  It is hard to get a free agent to come to a team that loses--so in some cases, Morgan had to overpay or accept questionable players. Morgan's first year as a GM demonstrated an understanding of the game like we have not seen since Polian, before his lost it. Canales, on the other hand, should be rated by the improvement of players.  Zavala, Ekwonu, Mays, Young, Smith-Wade, Coker, Wallace--all improved.  He had to overcome major losses such as D. Brown, Shaq, Dionte Johnson, Corbett--and we saw growth.  Despite all this team went through, after 8 games of disarray, This team finished 4-5 with close losses to both Super Bowl teams.  Frankly, I do not know how he did it. This year was better.  The WR room is solid with depth.  The OL room is solid with depth.  The TE room is as good as it has been in a while.  The RB room has the potential to be as good as it was when we had 28 and 34.  DBs?  Better.  DL?  Better.  Edge?  better.  The bottom of the roster?  Much better. We really don't know what we have yet, and that makes this offseason exciting.      
    • Here you go. 2 yards. Bryce Sneak.mp4
×
×
  • Create New...