Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Wonder who pushed for Mayfield...


Jmac
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, CRA said:

Teddy didn't just sit back and let Rhule throw him under the bus.   Rhule was publicly critical of Teddy not making a redzone play post game.  Teddy pushed back.    The beginning of the end.  

It's not unique to Rhule.  All NFL coaches when it gets real bad start firing guys to hopefully buy themselves some time and divert blame.  

 

And the irony was that Teddy's criticisms were spot on.  Still, he said unflattering things about Camelot, so he had to go and if we screwed ourselves in making that happen, well, that's The Process.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, CRA said:

Sam is also the biggest cap hit on the 2022 roster.   That a pretty massive cap hit.  It's a weird space for Rhule to be operating.  I don't think Rhule moving on from Sam is the absolute certainty that people think. 

and that's coming off last year where Teddy was the largest cap hit on that 2021 roster.    

I mean, I think moving on from Sam is the right call.  Better to make a horrible move, admit it and move on.  That often isn't seen a great deal in coaching.  Because while moving on from mistakes is correct it also highlights pretty massive mistakes you are making

 

I don't believe any coach is afraid of admitting a mistake, cutting bait, and moving on. That is a fan's perspective,  not a professional.  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, pantherclaw said:

I don't believe any coach is afraid of admitting a mistake, cutting bait, and moving on. That is a fan's perspective,  not a professional.  

I mean, NFL history is slam full examples of stubborn people and flat out idiots.  Massive egos too where everyone thinks what they do is always right. 

and the older I get, the more I realize that every single avenue of life contains idiots.   The people running your town, school board, state, country, big corporations.  You name it and you can find idiots.   The good old boys club of coaching is no exception to that rule of thought.   

We aren’t in Spartanburg.  These aren’t rookies.   And Rhule still has Sam, Elflein, Jordan, etc competing for starting roles.     Whatever you want to call that….it isn’t good.  

there aren’t a lot of good NFL HCs coaches.  It’s not an easy job.   And we have seen the college to pro experiment countless times.   You can keep claiming Rhule isn’t a problem.  I don’t care.  Free country.  But others think he is and it isn’t an unreasonable take at this stage.  So I can think Rhule isn’t a good NFL HC.  You can still hold out hope.  Neither should be a problem.  

And if Rhule proves the doubters wrong? That would be fantastic.  But my money isn’t on it. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Jon Snow said:

My guess is that it was Rhule that pushed for Mayfield.  Well pushed may be the wrong word. I would say he was the first and final vote on the matter. 

Yea I dont understand the anti-Rhule group now flips on the Baker deal?? I thought they allll agreeed he pushing hard for Baker to save his job? Now Baker looks decent, it was someone else??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think this team could have potential on O.  But the coaches seem set on limiting it to date and making it as hard as possible. 

maybe Rhule shows up in NE and starts repping his starters properly.  Or maybe they are working on chemistry in season as a Rhule slowly puts the people in place….when they should of gotten in the work this off-season.    I mean we have seen in season how it takes weeks for OL groupings to get chemistry down.  C/QB.  All that.  And the first half of games is where a big chunk of winnable games are.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Um, no, just no. Bills, Chiefs, Chargers, Ravens, Bengals, Texans, Eagles, Commanders are 8 teams that it's not even a debate, they aren't trading their QB for Purdy. Patriots, Broncos, Titans, Giants, Bears, Vikings, Falcons are 7 more teams with QBs drafted in the last 2 years that also would rather stick with them than trade for Purdy as they all have more upside than he does. Lions, Packers, Cowboys, Bucs are 4 more that would likely keep their QB's as well, age aside for Goff, Dak, and Baker. Panthers and Colts are two teams in the same situation, QB's who have both struggled and shown flashes to where the teams probably stick with them because they drafted them, but in a re-draft of all QB's, they probably take Purdy over the guy they currently have. Jags, Cardinals, Dolphins, are 3 more with QB's who probably have a higher upside than Purdy but come with their own question marks, so debatable if they'd take Purdy over who they already have. That leaves Jets, Raiders, Steelers, Browns, Saints, Seahawks, and Rams. Rams would take him over Stafford for the future of course, but not for 2025, and I'd think the Seahawks would take him over Darnold, but honestly not sure if they would take him over Milroe at this moment as they really like his potential and have him for 4 years really cheap. That leaves 5 teams that I see who would absolutely take him over their current situation right now, and a handful of others who MIGHT take him over their current guy, a far cry from your 20.  
    • Agreed. Also as soon as they received the top pick in the next draft it was over. Bears won that trade. Gave up a top overall pick got one the next year plus pick 9, a couple 2nds, and DJ Moore a proven young WR. Had their 2024 pick from us be in the late teens or later it would be more debatable IMO. 
    • Option A:  Pay your starting QB starting QB money. Option B:  Look for a starting QB for 4-10 years (or longer) while wasting the talent at every other position.    How many of the top 20 QB's do you think are worth what they are being paid?   When you factor in the last year of his present deal his contract is really an average of 45 million per year which in today's QB market is a very, very good deal. I wish we'd had found a Brock Purdy to pay 50+ million a year right after we parted ways with Cam.  Ya'll go ahead and live in fairy tale land where good to great (much less elite) QB's are available to pay. Just the fact that they had the chance to pay Brock after the disaster of trading up for Lance is a testament that when you find a quarter back you can win with, complete in the playoffs and superbowls with, you pay him.  
×
×
  • Create New...