Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bozeman Out 2-3 Weeks, No Vet Days Were Given, Kenny Robinson's Job May Be in Jeopardy per Rhule's Presser


Proudiddy
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, Proudiddy said:

While I agree, I think it was more the celebrating over his concussed body was what really drew their and Rhule's ire.  I love KRob's mentality and edge.  I hope he doesn't get cut for this.  

And from what I remember reading yesterday, Wilkerson was super antagonistic. 

There also is the fact you don’t know the end result of a hit immediately after the hit.   So unless you can see the future….it also can be easy to immediately celebrate a big hit in the moment and have no clue how bad it was for the person on the receiving end. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We got no idea about what made Krob body bag the pat player. I hope Rhule doesnt over react like I think he will.

 

FYI when asked JC horn said Krob has the hardest hitter among the DBs, wish I knew what the pats player did/said......... heard hes at the hospital as well. Maybe a few lessons will be learned form this.......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I personally think we need this attitude on our defense. I would rather a guy have it and then get reigned in by coaches then a guy just not have that brutality.  Better to be the hammer then the nail.  We all know the playoffs is about who can get away with hurting the others stars and not get called.  I've seen many a Panthers season derailed by other teams taking out our best players.  They pretty much did it to Cam every game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If his seat was hot enough for him to be fired 6 games in then you should've just fired him when you made the decision to draft a QB #1 overall. I don't think you go from "this is definitely our guy" to "you're fired in 6 games". Seems like there would be had to have been doubts going in and that's not a recipe for success for a rookie QB.
    • I like to use the analogy that a high draft pick QB is like a new supercar. Great to have one except too often, one forgets that they are high maintenance. A bad team secures their car under a cheap tent, puts regular gas in the tank, services it at Pep Boys, and then blames the car for not working properly and proceeds to get another one.  At the least, Ward getting sacked 25 times already is a massive red flag. If you can't protect your rookie QB, you do not put him out there. Otherwise, it's taking your supercar and immediately spinning it right into a tree. A few survive that rough of a start. Most do not.
    • I don't think there's any one size fits all answer. I think you play the rookie when A) you think he's ready and B) you think there's a reasonable expectation that the overall situation provides him an opportunity to be successful, not necessarily in terms of wins and losses but just in terms of giving him a fighting chance with surrounding talent. If you rush either one it's probably not gonna be pretty.
×
×
  • Create New...