Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Official Bills at Panthers GameDay Thread


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

12 minutes ago, poundaway said:

Pass ratio? Sure.

Joe Brady, on yet another thread?  pass

Rhule hate?  There's no horse left and there hasn't been for while. We're well past horse bits, all that's left is splatter, but we are going to beating the shlt out of whatever's left.

Only wins will change any narrative on Matt Rhule. 

 

Matt Rhule's new OC calls a higher % of pass plays than Matt Rhule's old OC.   

it's just example 32493 of Matt Rhule's rhetoric always being nonsense.  What Matt Rhule has been and is to date remains relevant in Matt Rhule discussions. 

There is no 7 year plan, there is no vision and there is no identity.  Every year he is just throwing junk at the wall. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, CRA said:

 remains relevant in Matt Rhule discussions. 

Every discussion is a bitch about Rhule discussion with you. 

We get it.  You're mad that Rhule acquired Sam Darnold, and he absolutely sucks and made Brady look bad so Brady got fired. 

We couldn't run last year either and that's partially Rhules fault too for relying on 4th rounder with absolute ass for hands that his wife recommended in the draft.

Please let it out.   We'll all pretend we haven't heard it 32493 times before.  Go on, you're going to anyway.

I was asking about pass ratio in preseason.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, poundaway said:

Every discussion is a bitch about Rhule discussion with you. 

We get it.  You're mad that Rhule acquired Sam Darnold, and he absolutely sucks and made Brady look bad so Brady got fired. 

We couldn't run last year either and that's partially Rhules fault too for relying on 4th rounder with absolute ass for hands that his wife recommended in the draft.

Please let it out.   We'll all pretend we haven't heard it 32493 times before.  Go on, you're going to anyway.

I was asking about pass ratio in preseason.

 

I would think McAdoo's track record as a playcaller would be more relevant than his preseason pass ratio.   Given there is no game planning and the emphasis in preseason is about working specific scenarios, situations, etc.

And his ratio as a playcaller is easy to find.  You were the one hypothesizing about what McAdoo might do this season in terms of pass ratio.  Based off history, it says we are going to pass slightly more.

vs Buffalo we logged officially 25 rush attempts and had 36 pass attempts.  So that trends an even higher pass ratio than McAdoo is known for.  

So again, seems relevant if you want to talk about our O.....what Rhule says he wants to be seems like a pretty relevant topic to reference.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, CRA said:

I would think McAdoo's track record as a playcaller would be more relevant than his preseason pass ratio.   Given there is no game planning and the emphasis in preseason is about working specific scenarios, situations, etc.

And his ratio as a playcaller is easy to find. 

I know what his ratio was.  It was heavy pass which is what I'm hoping for.  

Heavy pass ratio in preseason would just be an additional data point. 

I hope McAdoo does for Baker what he did for Eli: career years.  Baker with CMC, DJ, Robbie, Higgins, TMJ, Smith as weapons and  Ekwonu, Moton, Corbet, Bozeman and Christensen, up front, its the best our O has looked on paper in 5 years.

Less than two weeks.  I cannot wait.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, poundaway said:

I know what his ratio was.  It was heavy pass which is what I'm hoping for.  

Heavy pass ratio in preseason would just be an additional data point. 

I hope McAdoo does for Baker what he did for Eli: career years.  Baker with CMC, DJ, Robbie, Higgins, TMJ, Smith as weapons and  Ekwonu, Moton, Corbet, Bozeman and Christensen, up front, its the best our O has looked on paper in 5 years.

Less than two weeks.  I cannot wait.

It was an even heavier pass ratio vs Buff than his normal in season play calling.  That’s your extra data point.  

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, poundaway said:

Does anybody have the pass to run ratio in preseason?

It may be me being hopeful, but are we passing more, particulaly on first down?

Might we actually see an O like McAdoo did his first 2 years in NY?

The data say 75 rushing attempts, 104 pass attempts. 

11 of the 75 rushing attempts were by QBs. I only recall the one zone read Darnold did to score the TD so assuming we didn't have any other called QB runs, the other 10 QB rush attempts were likely pass play calls.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, trueblade said:

The data say 75 rushing attempts, 104 pass attempts. 

11 of the 75 rushing attempts were by QBs. I only recall the one zone read Darnold did to score the TD so assuming we didn't have any other called QB runs, the other 10 QB rush attempts were likely pass play calls.

This is exactly the type of thing I am hoping for.  Reducing the run game and emphasizing the pass will leverage what we have in DJ and Baker, and preserve CMC. 

Eli:
2013 pre-McAdoo        3818 yards 18 TDs  27 ints 57.5 cmp%
2014 McAdoo               4410 yards 30 TDs   5 ints 63.1  cmp%
Baker:
2021 pre-McAdoo        3010 yards  17  TDs  13 ints 60.5 cmp%  

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, poundaway said:

Every discussion is a bitch about Rhule discussion with you. 

We get it.  You're mad that Rhule acquired Sam Darnold, and he absolutely sucks

I still get a hearty laugh out of your old extremely pro Sam Darnold threads poundaway.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Gronk is the best TE of all time, but he also played with Brady. Clarke was great, but had Peyton and in an era TE's didn't make crazy money. Kittle is great, but the two times he's made the SB, he was still on his rookie contract for one, and the other the 49ers had Purdy on a cheap rookie deal which help them build the rest of the roster. So again, it's not about not wanting an elite TE, of course it would be nice.  But realistically, in today's NFL, unless that elite TE with a top end TE salary is on a team with a GOAT level QB and/or other serious cap savings (i.e. key players on rookie deals), then I think it's not a good use of cap space.  
    • This place was the poo pre tepper with tons of hilarious posters like phillyB. Joined in the 2000s during the 07 season and have been here bitching about this team since. but yeah its sadly been dying a slow death, every time I come to this site I am surprised its still up. I think the 2015 season was the absolute peak, the Panthers and this board especially just haven't "felt" the same since then. Igo should really sell the board since he clearly doesn't care anymore. Also, Reddit blows and the Bryce defenders on there need Jesus.
    • Guessing the price is too rich here given the injury history.  2024 was brutal and production dropped off in 2025 with a few more injuries (albeit rough qb play).    Don’t really understand the narrative that Young can’t benefit from talented upgrades on offense. Especially here with respect to a tight end. Any QB will benefit from talented receivers that threaten the top of coverage and tight ends with skills to stress zone.    The age and injury history, coupled with what he’s likely asking, just probably means we can better spend that money elsewhere.
×
×
  • Create New...