Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Other games


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Davidson Deac II said:

They actually look worse than us.  At least we kept the lead against AZ until the third qtr.  And Dalton looks worse than Mayfield.  

Honestly, I disagree strongly. If we turned the ball over 3 times there's zero chance we'd score 17 points in three quarters. The Saints are getting their asses kicked because of three INTs including two pick sixes.  They look terrible, yes. But nowhere near as inept as we do.

 

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Honestly, I disagree strongly. If we turned the ball over 3 times there's zero chance we'd score 17 points in three quarters. The Saints are getting their asses kicked because of three INTs including two pick sixes.  They look terrible, yes. But nowhere near as inept as we do.

 

 

Ints are inept…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Panthercougar68 said:

Ints are inept…

Despite that they've scored 24 points and are still in this game. If we'd turned the ball over three times including two pick sixes we'd be getting blown out in hilarious fashion.

I said earlier that we'd never score 17 points if we turned the ball over three times but hell, if I'm being honest I'm not sure we could score 17 if we were the team that got the two pick sixes off those three turnovers. We absolutely suck out loud.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Despite that they've scored 24 points and are still in this game. If we'd turned the ball over three times including two pick sixes we'd be getting blown out in hilarious fashion.

I said earlier that we'd never score 17 points if we turned the ball over three times but hell, if I'm being honest I'm not sure we could score 17 if we were the team that got the two pick sixes off those three turnovers. We absolutely suck out loud.

42-24 is just as bad as 24-10

the saints are a bad team that lost to us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jackie Lee said:

He's my fantasy "TE" this week so yes to that idea

Same lol I’m gonna keep exploiting that TE designation as long as I can. Hill now has at least one passing, rushing, and receiving TD on the year. I wonder if he’s the first player to do that since CMC a few years back after his infamous TD pass to Chris “Martinez” Manhertz against the Saints.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • We're in alignment regarding Thielen not being a game changer/breaker for the Panthers. Getting the ball into hands of playmakers like TMac and XL is going to open up things more than it is getting it to Thielen underneath (or letting him go after 50/50 balls 20yds downfield in his mid-30s). However, in a room where the other guys are two second year guys and two rookies, having a reliable vet that they can learn from is just as important as it is for the QB to have as a reliable third option. I can see that being worth $8.5M (just 3%) of the $279.2M cap... especially when looking at what's left out there: https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/free-agents/_/position/wr However, the idea that the team is forcing production to Thielen and leading to losses isn't supported by the data. Targets, not receiving yards, are how you can tell if a player is being "force fed." In the two games mentioned, let's look at the other players available... vs. TB 10 targets - Adam Thielen 9 targets - David Moore 8 targets - Tommy Tremble, Xavier Legette 3 targets - Jonathon Brooks 1 target - Dan Chisena, Feleipe Franks, Stephen Sullivan vs. PHI 11 targets - Adam Thielen 8 targets - Xavier Legette 5 targets - Chuba Hubbard, David Moore 2 targets - Tommy Tremble 1 target - Ja'Tavion Sanders, Deven Thompkins There isn't exactly a bounty of other names to throw the ball to. In those games, AT was one of the top 2 WRs. Diontae had been gone by that point.   So... yea. Agreed that Thielen isn't exactly carrying the team in his mid-30s, but it's undeniable that he was the most reliable target last season that still has quite a bit of value this season. Whether or not that value is reflected in a manner folks think on the contract is going to come down to personal taste. However, the idea that the team was forcing production to AT and that was the reason behind some losses couldn't be further from the truth.
    • I would also add that I think it's more than money.  AT has looked absolutely miserable out there at times, and there was a lot of speculation he would demand to be traded.  Personally, I thought he was a lock to be moved last year.  Maybe his hamstring is the only thing that prevents that from happening. The fact that he's not only willing to come back and play, but excited about it, really bodes well for Bryce.  AT is a veteran and he knows the game.  If he didn't have confidence in Bryce, I guarantee you he wouldn't be in a Panther uniform this year.  I'll take that as a positive.
×
×
  • Create New...