Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Phil Snow (Burns)

ncfan

By ncfan,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

WOW!! Grand Master

WOW!!

Posted
Posted
24 minutes ago, Basbear said:

the same rage when turdovac would drop Peppers in coverage...

Exactly... Rivera, did it with Hardy and Cj. Fox did it with pep and Rucker, and Capers did it with Green and Lathom.. All teams do it now.. Von miller, Mack, Garret, and Shaq Barret drops in coverage...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Basbear Grand Master

Basbear

Posted
Posted
Just now, Jackie Lee said:

Yeah Chinn back deep and Xavier who is 5'11" and 200 pounds in the box....

Each fuging time.........Woods needs everything hes got to stop Chubb/Barkely....... He played more LB than S......so dumb and one of my reason to rage. 

I said 10 games would be the least, in classic Rhule fashion, hes testing me.......

 

Lastly Ive heard the main reason for this is to "SAVE" chinn........You know what is better than that??? Have him stand on the sideline would be better, its about the same thing they going now with this 30 yards deep BS, sooooo GD dumb.. Its the NFL, let Chinn PLAY BALL!!!!!

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Basbear Grand Master

Basbear

Posted
Posted (edited)
11 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

Exactly... Rivera, did it with Hardy and Cj. Fox did it with pep and Rucker, and Capers did it with Green and Lathom.. All teams do it now.. Von miller, Mack, Garret, and Shaq Barret drops in coverage...

I get it, you cannot have him rush EVERY play. Just its a sorry-ass attempt at a ruse. "Wow you tricked me into dropping my best/only pass rusher into coverage"...........Maybe one a game, not every few plays. Move him around the DL, inside, left, right, have him next to haynes, etc. Do not drop him in coverage. Its fools gold.  

Edited by Basbear
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
WOW!! Grand Master

WOW!!

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, Basbear said:

I get it, you cannot have him rush EVERY play. Just its a sorry-ass attempt at a ruse. "Wow you tricked me into dropping my best/only pass rusher into coverage"...........Maybe one a game, not every few plays. Move him around the DL, inside, left, right, have him next to haynes, etc. Do not drop him in coverage. Its fools gold.  

I agree but the point remains this isn't a Carolina or College or Snow invention.. The NFL have been doing this for 30 years now.. 

Pitt dropped Harrison in the superbowl and he int for a TD..

The last sack yesterday was the DE dropping and the Giants sending a CB in his place.. 

It's a NFL strategy now..

Link to comment
Share on other sites
KushMcDieselson Explorer

KushMcDieselson

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

I agree but the point remains this isn't a Carolina or College or Snow invention.. The NFL have been doing this for 30 years now.. 

Pitt dropped Harrison in the superbowl and he int for a TD..

The last sack yesterday was the DE dropping and the Giants sending a CB in his place.. 

It's a NFL strategy now..

I mean I have seen d lineman do a surprise drop into coverage, but to put a pass rushing specialist in the slot to cover a receiver is pretty dumb, and dropping him into coverage 38% of a game? That's a special kind of stupid.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Basbear Grand Master

Basbear

Posted
Posted (edited)
14 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

I agree but the point remains this isn't a Carolina or College or Snow invention.. The NFL have been doing this for 30 years now.. 

Pitt dropped Harrison in the superbowl and he int for a TD..

The last sack yesterday was the DE dropping and the Giants sending a CB in his place.. 

It's a NFL strategy now..

Yea, its still is part of game-planing.....Tho I will say this- Burns is it. Dropping others when you still have legit pass rushers, its different.  Rucker was good and so was Jenkins......Peppers could play any spot on the field(minus ST)..... Burns is alll alone and I doubt his hands are good enough for some miracle INT....

To me I much rather Burns waste his energy running towards the QB, besides running out to a zone with not one player near. I swear I also seen him line up on a WR a couple times, is that "game-plan" "ok"?? (i swear late game he did it against toney)

Edited by Basbear
Link to comment
Share on other sites
WOW!! Grand Master

WOW!!

Posted
Posted
12 minutes ago, KushMcDieselson said:

I mean I have seen d lineman do a surprise drop into coverage, but to put a pass rushing specialist in the slot to cover a receiver is pretty dumb, and dropping him into coverage 38% of a game? That's a special kind of stupid.

At some point players got to step up..

Yetor, Hayes and they need to get Barno on the field.. They need to step up so the drop off in pass rushing isn't as steep.. 

Then the next question is who else on the dline can actually drop in coverage anyway??

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Michael G Mentor

Michael G

Posted
Posted
56 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

Yeah Chinn back deep and Xavier who is 5'11" and 200 pounds in the box....

Yeah I get it, but Chinn is a lot faster than Woods and so can cover more field as a single high. Woods is a good player but not what we needed to put Chinn back at SS or NB/LB. Probably best our option at FS besides Chinn would Hartsfield unless we move a corner. They kind of screwed up roster building and just try to make it work with what they want to do. Poor coaching from the start IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Basbear Grand Master

Basbear

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Michael G said:

Yeah I get it, but Chinn is a lot faster than Woods and so can cover more field as a single high. Woods is a good player but not what we needed to put Chinn back at SS or NB/LB. Probably best our option at FS besides Chinn would Hartsfield unless we move a corner. They kind of screwed up roster building and just try to make it work with what they want to do. Poor coaching from the start IMO.

Chinn needs the full Troy Polamalu treatment or become Thomas Davis 2.4 Its that simple. If youre worried about tackling will shorten his career, go coach soccer/cricket. 

I can not be convinced moving your best player 30 yards away form the LOS, is doing him any favors. If woods can play on the line, just swap them out. Chinn is a play making weapon and if the roles were reversed, Im fairly sure Chinn could have changed the out-come of that game. He had a ROTY season(I refuse to say young won, BS).....He showed the world then, now its "front row seat" placement Chinn?? ugh....

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Michael G Mentor

Michael G

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, Basbear said:

Chinn needs the full Troy Polamalu treatment or become Thomas Davis 2.4 Its that simple. If youre worried about tackling will shorten his career, go coach soccer/cricket. 

I can not be convinced moving your best player 30 yards away form the LOS, is doing him any favors. If woods can play on the line, just swap them out. Chinn is a play making weapon and if the roles were reversed, Im fairly sure Chinn could have changed the out-come of that game. He had a ROTY season(I refuse to say young won, BS).....He showed the world then, now its "front row seat" placement Chinn?? ugh....

I do not disagree. Chinn is our best FS, SS and maybe LB too. They just dropped the ball when they brought in Woods. Its poor coaching and team-building.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • tukafan21
      With the first pick, don't draft a QB? Draft a DE? C'mon!

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      Oh good lord Interest doesn't mean interest in making a bad trade to take the player, that's why I had such a long post, to accurately describe why those are two different things, but you don't like to listen to that stuff.  Being interested in a player doesn't live in a vacuum. It's very simple... there isn't a #1 draft pick type of grade on any of these QB's, if there was, we'd just take them.  You can't bluff a pick everyone knows you won't make, and trying to trade the pick is the CLEAR signal that you're not taking the QB. Just because the Raiders would have interest, doesn't mean they're going to bail us out of a situation we don't want to be in, they'd be smart about it and just sit put, let us take a non QB as we'd be telling the world we're not taking one just by trying to trade the pick, and then they'd take him at #2 (either with their own pick or by trading less to get that one). Oh, and your point of "if nobody is willing to make the trade, you obviously just take the best QB" is quite literally the dumbest thing I've ever read on here. If nobody is willing to trade up to take the QB, then it's OBVIOUS that the QB isn't worth taking with that pick, so OBVIOUSLY taking the best QB there is just OBVIOUSLY stupid and a bad pick. The moral of it is if there is a QB worth taking, we're taking them and not making the trade.  If there isn't a QB worth taking there, nobody is trading up to #1 to take one, we just showed the NFL how bad of an idea that is 2 years ago, it's really not hard to see. You keep making up this mythical situation where there is a QB who has shown to be worth trading up to #1 for and we'll be able to leverage that into a trade.  But we're the most QB needy team in the league, if we end up with the #1 pick, either we are taking a QB #1 or no QB is going #1 unless we get VERY lucky and two teams in the Top 5 fall in love with one prospect and we can play them off each other and fleece one of them. But again, I can't see that happening, as if there was a QB worthy of that, we're just taking him ourselves.
    • CamWhoaaCam
      With the first pick, don't draft a QB? Draft a DE? C'mon!

      By CamWhoaaCam · Posted

      Sanders is with Tom Brady brand and that's his mentor. The Raiders owner was with Sanders taking pics at a Vegas game together.   It doesn't take much to connect the dots that Vegas will be interested in Sanders as their franchise QB. Oh yeah and guess who hasa small ownership stake in the Raiders Tom Brady.   I guess this is just another made up Madden idea by me huh?
    • CamWhoaaCam
      With the first pick, don't draft a QB? Draft a DE? C'mon!

      By CamWhoaaCam · Posted

      Bro I don't mind debating you, but did you really have to write all that to get your point across.   This isn't Madden. If you have the #1 pick you literally control your own destiny. If nobody wants to trade which I have a hard time believing they won't then you obviously take the best QB.   I think we will have suitors. If that's Madden then so be it.
×
×
  • Create New...