Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Does Tepper keep Fitt and let him hire his own coach?


NAS
 Share

Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

You said you didn't want to trust Tepper with making the HC hire. Tepper hired Fitts. With the heavy input of Matt Rhule.

That's reality. The rest is pure copium.

As someone who chronicled pretty much every step of the GM search, I can tell you that wasn't how it went.

Edited by Mr. Scot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

The whole legion of Boom hates Wilson and everything that has happened since they got let go one by one. Only reason the Seahawks were even relevant in the last 20 years or however long, don't care to look it up

They were setup to be the next dynasty and then crumbled.  There's a lot of interpersonal issues at play there, but I have not been impressed by the management of that team since drafting Russ and Bobby Wagner.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

As someone who chronicled pretty much every step of the GM search, I can tell you that wasn't how it went.

Okay...

You went through these same motions with Gettleman. It's alright man. Sometimes we get excited about hirings/draftings/signings and they end up sucking. It happens. You don't have to keep blindly defending them for years.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Okay...

You went through these same motions with Gettleman. It's alright man. Sometimes we get excited about hirings/draftings/signings and they end up sucking. It happens. You don't have to keep blindly defending them for years.

 

Dude, you're not even talking about Fitterer at this point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Dude, you're not even talking about Fitterer at this point.

I'm still waiting for anyone to make an argument other than "he might not suck if not for Matt Rhule". That's the entire crux of the defense. He's been wheeling and dealing and we're fielding trash, our cap situation next year is trash, our draft capital situation is trash. How much further down a hell hole do y'all really need to watch this franchise plummet?

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So far the best arguments I've heard is Tepper sucks at hiring and Dan Morgan likes Fitterer.  I'm not sure those are good enough reasons to give Fitterer the next ~3 years of this team's future.  After that time, we'll likely be in the same exact spot we are now.  Might as well go ahead pull the plug, start over, and roll the dice now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

I'm still waiting for anyone to make an argument other than "he might not suck if not for Matt Rhule". That's the entire crux of the defense. He's been wheeling and dealing and we're fielding trash. How much further down a hell hole do y'all really need to watch this franchise plummet?

We're watching a team that's run by a college coach fielding a mostly college staff running college schemes in the pros.

Knowing that, I'm no more ready to clean out the personnel department than I am to gut the roster and give up on pics like Jaycee Horn.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

So far the best arguments I've heard is Tepper sucks at hiring and Dan Morgan likes Fitterer.  I'm not sure those are good enough reasons to give Fitterer the next ~3 years of this team's future.  After that time, we'll likely be in the same exact spot we are now.  Might as well go ahead pull the plug, start over, and roll the dice now.

Put everything in Tepper's hands and you may as well be rolling the dice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

We're watching a team that's run by a college coach fielding a mostly college staff running college schemes in the pros.

Knowing that, I'm no more ready to clean out the personnel department than I am to gut the roster and give up on pics like Jaycee Horn.

Thanks for confirming. "He might not suck if not for Matt Rhule" is literally the entire defense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It seems the needs for the Panthers are at positions that tend to require intelligence to lift others--going from "good to great"--FS, ILB, and C--as you say. While i like Rodriguez a lot (can see the Hurricanes [Jarvis] and Panthers with a mustache player to get the fans into it)--I also like Golday (WLB?).  However, take a look at smallish Kyle Louis (Pitt).  He is known to be cerebral, but he is small (5'11" I think) and for that, I moved him lower.  But look at the different LB events at the combine--he is near the top in most of them.  I see him as a sleeper.  So if we wait until the second round, we can get a solid LB.   So what if we grab a free agent edge specialist (veteran) for pass situations and help develop Princely.  We draft FS (Oregon) first--maybe trading back to do so--I dunno.  We sign a free agent ILB and draft a rookie like Rodriguez or Louis.  In the third, we could probably find a center, like (former OT Parker from Duke) or Slaughter or Pew (may have to trade up).   So, as you say, others are fighting for Edge players, WRs, and OTs early like seagulls on the beach fighting over spilled corn chips, We sit back, grab intelligent players that make others better.  FS, ILB, and C. OT scares me more that Edge if we do this--but for those screaming for an edge--we have edge players--2 with starting experience who have had some degree of success.  JC Davis can play either T spot and he is good at pass blocking--a bit raw--but could be developmental depth that could play in a pinch. Or you could draft a solid OT with shorter arms that are driving them down into day 3--and convert them to G or C later.  Nijman and BC being re-signed could provide enough to hold down the job until a developmental OT (World, Oregon?) prepares for a shot at it.  Wagner (ND) could play LT but is probably a future RT--he is expected to be drafted early day 3.  My favorite day 3 OT sleeper?  Keagan Trost, Missouri. Great run blocker, soild pass blocker in SEC--just shorter arms.  Maybe a guard down the road, but for the time being, a T.  Not ideal, but at least you are building for the future.  
    • I'm not like most people in this thread in regards to Love. I'm not like most in regards to RBs either. I think certain ones will always be drafted in the first round because they are valued that highly. From an on-the-field perspective, they are as valued as ever; business-wise and contract-wise at times to re-up, that's where things can get tricky with valuation. That being said, Love oozes potential and makes higher-ups' mouths water. I know that he if somehow he is available at 19, he will be considered if not taken. You don't leave that type of talent on the board unless there is another compelling player of arguably equal or more value at another position of need that may have a higher priority (like maybe Sonny Styles). Now all that being said, I  don't realistically see either one of them being there at 19 according to the draftniks.
×
×
  • Create New...