Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

$ for $ credit & Attracting next coach


RevJ
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 ) From PFT: I had not heard this. If so, then it weakens the case against early firing due to financial concerns:

Here’s a reason to do it sooner than later. If Rhule lands a job in the coming NCAA hiring cycle, the Panthers would get a dollar-for-dollar credit as to any remaining buyout. If Tepper keeps Rhule until after the season, the college jobs might be filled.

2) If we do have the roster strength some of us believe, it could help to  have Wilks lead a turn around so possible next coaches, (if not Wilks), would see better potential and have more interest.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, RevJ said:

1 ) From PFT: I had not heard this. If so, then it weakens the case against early firing due to financial concerns:

Here’s a reason to do it sooner than later. If Rhule lands a job in the coming NCAA hiring cycle, the Panthers would get a dollar-for-dollar credit as to any remaining buyout. If Tepper keeps Rhule until after the season, the college jobs might be filled.

2) If we do have the roster strength some of us believe, it could help to  have Wilks lead a turn around so possible next coaches, (if not Wilks), would see better potential and have more interest.  

That would fug up our draft pick though 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, RevJ said:

1 ) From PFT: I had not heard this. If so, then it weakens the case against early firing due to financial concerns:

Here’s a reason to do it sooner than later. If Rhule lands a job in the coming NCAA hiring cycle, the Panthers would get a dollar-for-dollar credit as to any remaining buyout. If Tepper keeps Rhule until after the season, the college jobs might be filled.

2) If we do have the roster strength some of us believe, it could help to  have Wilks lead a turn around so possible next coaches, (if not Wilks), would see better potential and have more interest.  

That offset is typical in an NFL coaching contract.  I wasn't sure what was in Rhule's contract, since they went all in to get the snake oil salesman and with Hurney involved, anything was possible.  Good to hear that part is on standard terms.

If anything, with some big-name college jobs open, it makes sense to send Rhule out the door as soon as that final decision has been made so he can land one of those jobs.  His name has been mentioned with Nebraska and Arizona State (that I know of), and either of them could remove a lot of the financial onus on the Panthers.

As far as talent and a bit of a turnaround to showcase it, we'll see.  I think we have more talent than some think, but not as much as others believe.  I also think the bulk of our young talent is on defense, which might be tempting to a coach with a background in defense.  I know a lot of people here want an offensive-minded coach, but our situation is less attractive to such candidates, IMO. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Sgt Schultz said:

As far as talent and a bit of a turnaround to showcase it, we'll see.  I think we have more talent than some think, but not as much as others believe.  I also think the bulk of our young talent is on defense, which might be tempting to a coach with a background in defense. 

...or to an offensive coach who can hire a coordinator to run the defense and then build the offense according to his own vision.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This draft is 2023 all over again, it's not hard to see. QB's who don't grade out as high first round prospects while at the same time, the following draft class looks to be loaded with elite QB prospects. Drafting a QB just because you need one (or making a bad trade to make said draft pick), when there isn't one worthy of that draft pick, is how you ruin franchises, just look at us right now.  
    • I upgraded to the S24+ a few weeks back. Very happy with it. 
    • LOL... Yet again proving you can't look below anything than what you see on the surface Mock drafts ARE NOT draft grades They are what people think will happen.  They are mocking teams taking QB's in the top 5 of the draft because that's just historically how drafts go regardless of the grades on the QBs.  Almost every draft expert, even those mocking QB's going high, have said time and time again that none of these QB's actually grade out as those type of picks. This is again, where I say you don't like to actually read what I have to say, because I already explained it. 2022 the exact same thing happened, mock drafts had guys like Pickett and Willis going in the Top 5 because that's just what teams usually do, but GM's listened to their prospect grades and knew they weren't worth taking that high, so they didn't. It's not to say QB's won't go that high this year, but it's to say that they aren't graded out as elite QB prospects.   And yes, I've never said I'm not a T-Mac homer. But me being that doesn't change that he will be the highest graded offensive player in this year's draft, at a position we haven't been able to solve since we lost Smitty.  Taking him makes all the sense in the world, my bias aside.
×
×
  • Create New...