Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

PJ and Eason time


Jackie Lee
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Intangible wise? I'd argue Rodgers and Mahomes are equal on a mental level, superior on the physical.

I'd probably also have thrown Russell Wilson into that mix before this season. Herbert might be but I don't know that we've seen enough of him to say that yet. Ditto Joe Burrow.

Some of the other guys I'd most closely compare to Brady have retired in the past few years. Brees was arguably the closest, though others would likely put one or both Manning brothers above him (or even above Brady for that matter).

Andrew Luck arguably could have gotten to that level but probably didn't play long enough. Wentz had potential too but God only knows what happened there. Hell, Matt Ryan is the same style of quarterback, though definitely nowhere near as close to Brady's talent level as the other guys.

Bottom Line: There are plenty of quarterbacks out there with more to offer than just athleticism. Brady isn't the only guy with superior brains.

I can agree with Rodgers and Mahomes... but the rest I am not quite convinced yet that they can reach levels of performance that Brady has shown since his rookie year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

I can agree with Rodgers and Mahomes... but the rest I am not quite convinced yet that they can reach levels of performance that Brady has shown since his rookie year.

Well, you can't discount the teams they were part of either.

Brady landed in what was probably the best situation he could have between Charlie Weis and later Josh McDaniels. Brees got the same when he joined up with Payton. Some of the current guys aren't in situations as beneficial as those.

Imagine, for example, Joe Burrow or Justin Herbert being coached by Andy Reid.

Edited by Mr. Scot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Well, you can't discount the teams they were part of either.

Brady landed in what was probably the best situation he could have between Charlie Weis and later Josh McDaniels. Brees got the same when he joined up with Payton. Some of the current guys aren't in situations as beneficial as those.

Imagine, for example, Joe Burrow or Justin Herbert being coached by Andy Reid.

Totally agree there. Thats actually why I made my statement prior to this one. The other QBs you listed just are privy to what TB12 was. Thats a big difference, but thats what helped Aaron and Patrick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

I want to say the latter, but the more I think about it the more it seems like a wash.  Most QB prospects are unsuccessful, and athletes like Cam Newton or Josh Allen are incredibly rare to begin with.

I think you have the best chance of finding a franchise QB if you're taking chances on better prospects.  Whether that's a top level prospect on an athletic level or the other end of the spectrum.  If we're waiting for a 3rd-5th round pick or a guy like Eason to come along and be the guy, I think we're going to be waiting for a very long time.  That's one of the worrying things about Fitterer's philosophy for me.  He hasn't come out and said it, but it seems like he thinks we can find another Russell Wilson on a discount rack in the draft or FA/trade.

So this is why I really liked the Corral pick. This preseason didn’t matter to me (I understand I’m close to alone on that). That argument has been had. Just stating my view.

 

He has a lot of traits you look for regarding arm talent (release, off platform, velocity, short/mid accuracy), combined with enough athleticism and foot speed to be a threat, and to be a solid foundation for navigating a pocket with agility. 


I think taking guys like him is the right move. They don’t have to be Cam, but they should be able to physically make all the nfl throws, and have the athleticism to make the first guy miss and run effective boots that can turn into positive yardage. 
 

If we draft another QB in the next draft, a Corral type is preferable, and then you coach these guys and you just need one of them to click mentally.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Absolutely LOVED Smitty as a player. Who didn't? But Smitty the person, yeah... not so much. Unfortunately all those things that made us love him as a player had no off switch. He was basically the exact same person off the field that was on the field and that's obviously just not gonna work well in polite society.  
    • And our record says we were a losing team that lucked into getting into the playoffs. Playoffs are not our standard because we didn't earn our way in, the Falcons had to do it for us. We also got in because the NFCS sent another losing record team to the playoffs and the Panthers are the only team in the NFL to go twice with a losing record. That's not something to be proud of. The reason I brought up the 13 and 16 point scores was those are not typically wins most weeks in the NFL. In fact, there were 31 wins this season where the winning team scored under 20. 7 of those happened in week 18. That means this past season, only 11% of the time, the winning team scored under 20. Prior to week 18, that was 9%. Week 18 was a statistical anomaly.  How often does a team go into the red zone 6 times and come away with 13 points? Not often. GB did and we won that game. And we played a Jets team (0-7 at the time) that was offensively inept. Teams also don't consistently win one score games as often as we did either. Those things tend to balance themselves out the following year. I'm not erasing wins. I'm looking at how this team actually performed during the season. We defied the odds winning 2 games scoring under 20. The record, and the stats across the NFL, show we are in reality closer in performance to a 6 win team than we are to 8.    If Bryce was a FA for another team would we be looking at him? Probably not. He's in the retread and dice roll category. It just so happens we just signed him to the option. There's not a lot of good options out there right now. That's why I'm not in the sign a vet as QB2 club. Bring in a retread or dice roll. Trotting a vet out a couple of games isn't going to get us anywhere long term. 
    • Not sure he is in the top ten but: His 9.99 RAS score, second among 1,512 tackles since 1987, isn't a gimmick. You see every bit of that explosiveness translate to the field when he kicks and slides in pass sets. NFLDraftBuzz
×
×
  • Create New...