Offers for Burns

[Mr. Scot]

9 minutes ago, 1of10Charnatives said:

Mr Scot.  Why dont' you ask him who he regards as credible?

I'm not that interested

[ForJimmy]

2 minutes ago, Panthers Fan 69 said:

He’s an excellent pass rusher. But it’s not an all-around defense end. A team that is very close that needs pure pass rusher  Burns is your guy. He’s a missing piece for a team that needs someone to do nothing but rush the passer

So not a JAG. Which is what I was saying. He is excellent at a very desirable skill.

[toldozer]

Yeah we have to trade him. Why would he want to sign a long term deal here when it's a huge unknown If we'll get the qb position right. If it's the eagles 2 firsts in the draft you run and do it. Then we can decide if there is a qb we like head and shoulders above the rest. If not we take Anderson #1 and take our top qb left at the top 10 pick that should be the saints pick. That should still get us hooker or levis.

[1of10Charnatives]

3 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I'm not that interested

You're killing me Smalls!

[Jaxel]

17 minutes ago, Gucceland said:

Multiple Panthers reporters confirmed CMC wouldn't be traded for less than a 1st round pick too....

Not true, they legit such as person and newton said multiple times it owuld be tough to get a 1 for CMC.

[jamos14]

Some of you guys are stupid as hell.

You can be sure that Philly isn't including the current top 5 pick in the mix or it would be automatic yes.

For all we know, these aren't even 2023 1st rounders.    Burns might not be top 5 DE but is absolutely top 10.

 

Why do you think these teams are offering multiple first rounders for him?  Because he's good as poo.  And still has tons of room to grow.  He is the cornerstone piece on defense to build the team around.  You absolutely cannot trade him unless the picks are astronomical.

 

[Gucceland]

11 minutes ago, 1of10Charnatives said:

You don't think credible sports reporters verify info from one organization from other sources? That's basically the difference between guys like Shefter and the bottom feeders who just print rumors unsubstantiated.  Those guys count on people not paying attention over time to whether their rumors have any truth behind them. You know who pays attention over time? 

Mr Scot.  Why dont' you ask him who he regards as credible?

You seem to be constructing a reality out of whole cloth that suits your narrative without actually worrying about what's true beyond your own opinion.

 

Reporters are just that...reporters.  The report the information given them.  Anyone with the slightest business sense understands the advantages of driving up the price and the best way to do that is to get the information out there via reporters.  Reporters are only as credible as their source.  

[jamos14]

And on top of that, what would we do with a 1st round pick from the trade?

 

Immediately look for a pass rushing DE that we can only hope is as good as Burns.   Trading him makes absolutely no sense.

[1of10Charnatives]

3 minutes ago, Gucceland said:

Reporters are just that...reporters.  The report the information given them.  Anyone with the slightest business sense understands the advantages of driving up the price and the best way to do that is to get the information out there via reporters.  Reporters are only as credible as their source.  

Hence the gist of my post being about good reporters verifying information through mulitples sources in different organizations. Congratulations, you've failed at reading comprehension.

[Gucceland]

7 minutes ago, Jaxel said:

Not true, they legit such as person and newton said multiple times it owuld be tough to get a 1 for CMC.

Adam Schefter being used by Carolina to drive up CMC price...just like Burns price.

Listening hardly means the team is dealing McCaffrey. If the Panthers do not receive what they feel is a real offer -- with a high draft pick or multiple picks -- they are adamant that they will hold on to McCaffrey past the NFL's Nov. 1 trade deadline, sources told ESPN.

[gakonline]

Burns is on schedule to have 8.5 sacks & 35 combined tackles on the season. Stupid to turn down two first round draft picks. 

[Gucceland]

2 minutes ago, 1of10Charnatives said:

Hence the gist of my post being about good reporters verifying information through mulitples sources in different organizations. Congratulations, you've failed at reading comprehension.

Congratulations...you failed on business comprehension.  How exactly can a good reporter verify multiple sources that work for the Panthers btw on an offer that was not accepted?  Have you ever negotiated anything in your life?  Do you have a clue how the "real" world works?  I think not.

[nogoodbum]

Which 2 firsts? 2 in 2023 draft or a 2023 & 2024? An early 23 & possibly late 24? A late 23 & late 24? Any trade that includes late first calls for at least a 2nd [both late] or a 3rd [one early-one late] IMO

[1of10Charnatives]

Just now, Gucceland said:

Congratulations...you failed on business comprehension.  How exactly can a good reporter verify multiple sources that work for the Panthers btw on an offer that was not accepted?  Have you ever negotiated anything in your life?  Do you have a clue how the "real" world works?  I think not.

*sighs* If someone offered two firsts for Burns, you check with your sources around the league until you identify one who confirms from the team that offered. Obviously, as the reporter you can't state which team, because that would come pretty close to outting your source with his own team. 

Does someone really need to explain this Mickey Mouse poo to you, or are you the sole arbiter of how the real world works?

Really?