Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What’s your 2023 QB big board (including Corral)


Wundrbread33
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

The Panthers fan in me really wishes he was draft eligible. The Tar Heels fan in me is really glad that he's not.

Obviously you can never count on someone being available next year, but it does suck when there's the possibility of a guy being better than your current options.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

I don’t hate him at all you are being dramatic. I have said since training camp rhule fuged this kid.  I have also Said the odds of a 3rd round pick becoming a franchise guy is astronomical.    Now with his injury and new staff there is no realistic avenue for him to contribute to this team in the near future.  
 

otas and minicamps don’t give a rookie learning a new offense that much of a head start?  Goddamn dude okay I am not even getting in to that with you.  Just look at baker for exhibit a.   

You mentioned normally teams won't do this or that.  

Corral situation isn't normal whatsoever.  You've agreed Rhule Fuged him, as do I.

I do not believe any new coach isn't going to just shrug off Corral because he wasn't his pick.  It's a golden opportunity to have two good young QBs to choose from.  You don't know whether either of them will pick up the offense better than the other. 

That's why you have competition. Let the players decide on the field not on draft status or anything else.  In the end Corral might win the job or he could be the 3rd QB. It called competition.  This is all I've ever implied.  He will get a chance to compete.

As far as not being able to practice until August.  That is purely based on the timetable of this injury.  Many QBs in the past have had the "Not until August" label and yet participate in many or all of the OTAs and minicamps.  If Corral can move without pain, he'll be competing.  They may be kept out of contact drills and any drill that might cause a reinjury.  We'll truly find out when OTAs and minicamps start.  Even so, he'll be there and do whatever work he can do to win the job.  

Come August, he'll compete, plain and simple. 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

I agree we'll draft a QB but I also believe Corral will be given every opportunity to win the job. 

I don't know about him getting a shot as a starter (it'd be a long shot if he does) but I do firmly believe he should get a fair chance to stay on the roster...and probably will.

It would seem like a mistake to simply drop him without at least seeing if he's got something to offer.

Edited by Mr. Scot
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I don't know about him getting a shot as a starter (it'd be a long shot if he does) but I do firmly believe he should get a fair chance to stay on the roster...and probably will.

It would seem like a mistake to simply drop him without at least seeing if he's got something to offer.

He'll be on the roster for sure.  I don't see where it's a long shot at starting though.  

We'll start the offseason with PJ or a veteran on the team with Corral.  One or the other.  Assuming we change OC, none of the QBs will have a full knowledge of that offense.  While Corral might be behind the eight ball if his injury still lingers, I don't see why we won't have a full competition between the 3 QBs on this roster.  It's not like we'll have a QB that has been on the team for awhile and is facing competition.

I guess we'll see. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

He'll be on the roster for sure.  I don't see where it's a long shot at starting though.  

We'll start the offseason with PJ or a veteran on the team with Corral.  One or the other.  Assuming we change OC, none of the QBs will have a full knowledge of that offense.  While Corral might be behind the eight ball if his injury still lingers, I don't see why we won't have a full competition between the 3 QBs on this roster.  It's not like we'll have a QB that has been on the team for awhile and is facing competition.

I guess we'll see. 

The long shot is that he's likely going to be competing with a very highly drafted prospect.

Throw a veteran in there and the challenge gets even tougher.

Edited by Mr. Scot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

He'll be on the roster for sure.  I don't see where it's a long shot at starting though.  

We'll start the offseason with PJ or a veteran on the team with Corral.  One or the other.  Assuming we change OC, none of the QBs will have a full knowledge of that offense.  While Corral might be behind the eight ball if his injury still lingers, I don't see why we won't have a full competition between the 3 QBs on this roster.  It's not like we'll have a QB that has been on the team for awhile and is facing competition.

I guess we'll see. 

Yeah unless they literally draft 2 QB's I don't see how he's not here through Preseason week 3 at least. We've already been through half the realistic upcoming FA class

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

The long shot is that he's likely going to be competing with a very highly drafted prospect.

Throw a veteran in there and the challenge gets even tougher.

This is a good draft class but there isn't one in this class that I would say is a "Franchise QB".  I don't think it is as long as a long shot as you believe.

I guess we'll see. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

This is a good draft class but there isn't one in this class that I would say is a "Franchise QB".  I don't think it is as long as a long shot as you believe.

I guess we'll see. 

They don't have to be.

They just have to be a good starter.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just don’t see a guy in this draft where I'm like take that guy!

The guy I least want is Young. A midget that has a year to throw and wide open recievers with a D that typically shuts down the other team so he faces an increasingly fatigued defense himself will not transition well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/26/2022 at 1:29 PM, year of the snitch said:

#5: Matt Corral - I don't even think I have Matt at 5, there are better prospects. I saw Matt play in the NFL, he unfortunately does not have it. I wanted him to succeed very much, he's from my area and seems like a great dude. His debut was really weak and with the foot / leg injuries back to back, I don't ever see him breaking out.

Sound ridiculous calling a couple of preseason drives with the backups "playing in the NFL".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I had started typing my post hours ago and didn’t finish it and just came back to finish it, posted it, then saw yours and saw we were pretty much saying the same thing - even the games that stick out to us most.  I don’t think a lot of people remember that SF playoff game, but I felt like I had just got mugged in broad daylight.  I remember them calling Mitchell for unnecessary roughness, and then I remember watching Boldin take a super late cheap shot, dead in front of the ref and then showing him watching the whole thing in replay…  the refs let them have a fuging field day and didn’t do jack poo, but if we so much as breathed the wrong way it was fuging 15 yards.  Each team playing under two completely different sets of rules.  poo hurt.  I was enraged.  I’ve never went back to watch either that game or SB50 and never will.  fuging robbery.
    • I’ve said it a million times since, but it’s impossible to keep them from affecting the game.  In SB50, they literally took the game from us, and they did it early.  Cotchery’s no-catch?  The miraculous amount of times we converted for a first down only to have it suddenly called back make it a 3rd down and 15+ against the best defense in the league that specialized in rushing the passer and man coverage on the back end?  And you do that enough times, you kill the morale and confidence of the team you’re doing it against.  It’s telling the one team “you can do whatever with impunity” and the other “you can’t do whatever they’re allowed to do.”  It changes the aggression level.  It essentially neuters one team and allows the other to do whatever the fug they want.  Imagine you call the police for help and they get there and tell you to sit still while the other party beats the poo out of you and you can’t defend yourself.  That’s what the officials do.  There is no way to avoid them affecting the game.  And more often than not, it’s the most subjective calls they use to do so.  Even in SB50…  you saw the Broncos commit more egregious penalties than anything we did, and barely any of it was called.  Their OL was holding all fuging game and the refs did nothing.  We already had our work cut out for us against two future HOF edge rushers and the refs played to their advantage with that.  From what I remember, both Oher and Remmers were called for holding at various times and their hands were in the INSIDE of the defender.  It was garbage, but all by design. Also, if there is any video of it anywhere, go look at what the refs did against us back in 2013 against SF.  The fix was in there too.  They stepped in early and often and ensured we knew we were not allowed to play with the same aggression or intensity SF was.  It was disgusting as well. at this point, I hope Vince McMahon, errr, I mean Goodell just finally scripts us to win it, because this poo is not won via competition or off merit.
    • You can go back to the New York Knicks somehow getting Patrick Ewing.  I saw a story where they place the New York Knick card in the freezer right before the drawing.  It was simple.  Show everyone the cards are undetectable to the human eye.  All they had to do was grab the coldest card. IMO ever since Goodell took over the NFL it has been fishy.  Patriots winning the SB after 9/11, New Orleans after Katrina and Peyton Manning's going away gift against us. The terrible calls during that game were blatantly one sided.  New England should have been stripped of their first 3 SB when they were caught spying on the other team in their SB wins.  I think the evidence against the Patriots was so damning Goodell felt it could ruin football and they brushed it under the table.   In the 2004 SB, How did we go from practically no yards in the first Quarter to setting a record in the 3rd Qtr.  Dan Henning changes the game plan.  IMO probably the greatest half time adjustment of all time.  
×
×
  • Create New...