Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Executives grade trade activity


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

17 minutes ago, Khyber53 said:

We can't really judge it at all until we see how those picks get used. 

Thats the thing though... its not a matter of what the picks turn into. Its the fact we got all of those picks.

What the GM/FO chooses to do with those picks have nothing to do with the deal itself. If a new HC comes in and trades all of those picks for a single pick and flops and the team that received the picks get two great starters... was the CMC deal bad? or was the HC misuses of those resources bad?

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

2nd and 3rd rounders are projected starters in the league.

If the inverse of the situation you are sharing, or even the half inverse of it and we get one player that makes an impact and the rest is depth... then the deal is a major win. 

That being said.....There is no losing in that deal in this situation, its just bad management of the resources aqcuired in a solid trade.

projected as starter doesn’t meant staying power as a successful player, you’re looking at roughly a ~35% chance of a player selected in the second and third round becoming a long term player for you

those aren’t bankable numbers and the idea that the “good teams” get 3-4 starters out of every draft has been an enduring myth around here

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Growl said:

projected as starter doesn’t meant staying power as a successful player, you’re looking at roughly a ~35% chance of a player selected in the second and third round becoming a long term player for you

those aren’t bankable numbers and the idea that the “good teams” get 3-4 starters out of every draft has been an enduring myth around here

I was mainly replying to your statement: most of those picks don’t project as starters

As I stated, 2nd and 3rd rounders are projected starters.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TheCasillas said:

Thats the thing though... its not a matter of what the picks turn into. Its the fact we got all of those picks.

 

what in the hoop jumping nonsense is this

the goal isn’t to “get lots of picks”

it’s to “build a super bowl caliber roster”

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, TheCasillas said:

I was mainly replying to your statement: most of those picks don’t project as starters

As I stated, 2nd and 3rd rounders are projected starters.

okay well I imagine your standards in life and expectations for yourself are far lower than they likely should be

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, TheCasillas said:

you need picks to do that...

no, you need good players to do that, “lots of picks,” especially the ones the panthers acquired in the mccaffrey deal are no reliable predictive indicator of success.

 

there is a reason the successful teams in this league are persistently willing to trade away their draft picks for proven successes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mr. Scot said:

From the article:

“It is crazy to think the Panthers got almost a whole draft in the past two weeks,” one general manager said.

The Panthers sent McCaffrey to the 49ers for second-, third- and fourth-round picks in 2023 and a fifth-rounder in 2024. They also moved wide receiver Robbie Anderson to the Cardinals for a sixth-rounder in 2024 and a seventh-rounder in 2025.

“I think the six draft picks is the best (haul),” another general manager said. “They’re loading up for a QB next year. Either trade up or put good players around the new QB.”

The Panthers, who are currently in line for the third pick in April, are in desperate need for a quarterback after back-to-back offseason trades for Sam Darnold and Baker Mayfield haven’t panned out.

They’re in an obvious rebuild, which they officially declared by firing head coach Matt Rhule and trading the franchise’s most popular player in McCaffrey, but they’ll begin to clear their books from those contracts in the offseason. They just need to be able to hit on their quarterback in the draft.

“I like what the Panthers did with the collection of picks for McCaffrey,” an executive said. “It was what they needed with their situation.”

The assistant coach added, “Long term, the Panthers will benefit most, because they have to fully rebuild.”

From the 49ers side...

The general opinion was that the McCaffrey trade was mutually beneficial. Hard to argue after McCaffrey racked up three touchdowns Sunday when the 49ers beat the Rams, 31-14.

“Instant splash,” the coach said.

But there’s one concern.

“Great for Carolina, tons of risk for San Francisco,” an executive noted. “He better stay healthy. And even if he does, is it because you managed his workload? Is that why you traded for him?  To manage his workload?”

A general manager agreed, “That’s a big haul for a running back who has been injured.”

It’s a valid trepidation. McCaffrey missed 23 games from 2020-21. And even though he was healthy this past offseason, the Panthers limited the 26-year-old’s reps in training camp and kept him out of the preseason.

If McCaffrey does stay healthy, though, as he did for his first three years in the league and again this season, the star running back has already shown what type of difference he can make for the 49ers.

And that’d make it a win-win.

Anyone that says the Panthers are rebuilding should be slapped in the face by whoever they're talking to.

We need a QB, otherwise this is a good roster (that can obviously be improved upon, as can every roster in the NFL).

Also it's still a loss as McCaffrey is a HoF talent that we traded away cheaply.

  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Growl said:

no, you need good players to do that, “lots of picks,” especially the ones the panthers acquired in the mccaffrey deal are no reliable predictive indicator of success.

 

there is a reason the successful teams in this league are persistently willing to trade away their draft picks for proven successes.

You need picks to do that.... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

RBs peak around 26-27.  CMC is 26.  He has been injured.  While I see him lasting a bit longer because he can catch, as a pure RB, his days are numbered.  To me, I do not see why any RB gets a second contract.  The teams rarely get value in doing so.  Think of RBs like college players--four years and graduate them.

Because of the excitement and production that comes from a good run game, RBs have always been highly valued by fans and many teams. The truth is that they get beat up a lot and it doesn't take a lot to replace production.

People want a star RB that you keep for years and years, but it's just not necessary because there are always younger and cheaper options out there. You may not find elite talent, but RB is a job that you don't really need elite talent.

It's better to focus your attention on QB and OL because once you have those in place, everyone else will produce more.

It's tempting, once you have a really good or even elite talent there to give them extensions, but you can be sure that you will be overpaying for a position and a player that will be breaking down much sooner than later.  

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

I was going to say, if his injury history continues, I don't think you can say he is a surefire HOFer. 

That's actually one of the most difficult positions to make the HOF, IMO.

true. he's got that kind of talent. doubtful he's got the durability to pull it off. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Give me Mitchell Evans over T Sanders in this run heavy offense any day of the week. 
    • What's up gents, the OGs remember me, the guy who single-handedly gave the Panthers the greatest uniform in history moniker. Not too long after that I got involved with Pro Football Focus (pre-Collinsworth acquisition) and ended up taking backseat here to preserve some objectivity. But from a distance I noticed a lot. After the end of the Cam era this place devolved into the most un-fun, petty, negative cesspool of whining and bitching that has ever graced the internet. The worst part of it all is that the level of discussion turned into the most ill-informed, hot-take, unnuanced crap, rife with people talking out of their posteriors as if they have any clue about what they are watching. Once you get into the professional side of the sport and actual film rooms, you start to understand there's an absurd number of moving parts to pretty much every snap and the details you are privy to are truly only half the picture. The absolute most important thing I learned from being part of professional level football analysis is that quarterbacking is literally the most intricate and difficult position in all of professional sports, and that the NFL itself is struggling to develop any workable model that allows them to understand what makes one succeed vs what makes one fail. Because of this paradox it has also made the quarterback position itself grossly overvalued from a fan and media standpoint, creating an absurd fixation on the results delivered by a single player who has to rely on the contributions of everyone around them. This also drives the dreaded inflation of QB salaries that inevitably cause even elite teams to lose key talent all to pour cash into the one player supposed to be able to single-handedly elevate the entire team (and defense and special teams and coaching and ownership by some mysterious proxy), yet without those same players even talented teams can wander the wilderness searching for the right guy to take advantage of their talent window. The discussions the last few years around Bryce has personified this insanity, as this board has devolved into some sort of electronic civil war between the hyperbolic Young supporters and the vitriolic Bryce haters. The reality, like practically everything in this world, is somewhere in the middle. He has traits that can absolutely elevate a team with creativity, play recognition, off-arm angle throws, mental toughness, etc. He's also physically limited, with mostly "good-enough" qualities for most situations that a professional quarterback is asked to do, and will never be an overpowering physical force like pre-injury Cam. But "good-enough" physicality represents a large majority of championship-winning quarterbacks, even in the modern era. There's a reason the corpse of Peyton Manning took the chip from elite physical specimen Cam, because the team surrounding him was talented enough to get him there, while we all know Cam was the driving force of that 2015 team. That's no knock on him, that's just how the game of football tends to work: the more complete team usually wins. The summary is this: if this team lives or dies solely on the performance of its quarterback, then it is absolutely a paper tiger even if he plays brilliantly week in and out. There are no superheroes in this sport, there are only conduits that proxy the collective efforts of much of the team around them. And no one alive can tell you how the position is played perfectly, it's all a confluence of circumstance and what unique collection of traits each player brings to the position, which can never be truly recreated season after season, even for the same player on the same team. If this place remains a raging hellscape of idiotic hot takes I will happily remove myself again and do something more productive for yet another decade, but maybe's there hope that we can all get back to the old adage, and keep pounding.
    • Really impressed how the bottom six have looked the past couple games
×
×
  • Create New...