Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

College BBall 2022

jayboogieman

By jayboogieman,
in Charlotte Hornets

 Share

Recommended Posts

Shocker Grand Master

Shocker

Posted
Posted (edited)
7 minutes ago, jayboogieman said:

Davis will probably get another year at least unless the Heels totally collapse and have a bad losing season. So, I suppose the diehards will have to hope he improves as a coach.

I don’t see any coaching adjustments at all during game play.  None.  This was last year too.  They hit fire from 3 in the tournament last year but Hubert can’t make adjustments.  If it works great, otherwise the team is fugged 

Try a zone…slow the game, speed the game…do anything but the same no offensive sets over and over.  Sad

Edited by Shocker
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Davidson Deac II Grand Master

Davidson Deac II

Posted
Posted
14 hours ago, jayboogieman said:

After 3 straight losses, they might not be once the new rankings come out.

I am definitely, positively, absolutely, not a UNC fan, and maybe they shouldn't be ranked at this point. But losing by 12 at Indiana is not necessarily a terrible loss.  In fact, they honestly did a little better than I thought they would.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
jayboogieman Grand Master

jayboogieman

Posted
  • Author
Posted
10 hours ago, Davidson Deac II said:

I am definitely, positively, absolutely, not a UNC fan, and maybe they shouldn't be ranked at this point. But losing by 12 at Indiana is not necessarily a terrible loss.  In fact, they honestly did a little better than I thought they would.

I get what you're saying, but UNC has been struggling with teams they should have beaten easily. Then they lost to Iowa St and Bama. Those aren't exactly powerhouse basketball schools, like UNC and Indiana have traditionally been, even though they're doing well so far this season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • cardiackat88.
      Well, the Niners just doomed themselves to mediocrity

      By cardiackat88. · Posted

      Teams do some super stupid stuff with mid-fairly good QBs. I think they are just absolutely terrified they will be stuck with a QB that is not the quality of the QB they have now, even if its someone like Daniel Jones. Lots of trash QBs go in the first round. I encourage you to take a look at the sad, sad list of first round QBs in the last 15 years.  
    • Joe Bear
      Okay, now face the facta guyd

      By Joe Bear · Posted

      No, it will be a raw 6'7" 17-year-old European who just played basketball for the first time in March and who the idiot GM "had first on our board." He'll play the whole G-League season, get in 42 games for the Hornets and average 1.1 ppg on 35% shooting. Been there, seen that.
    • ForJimmy
      JJ Jansen on tanking

      By ForJimmy · Posted

      We missed on Burns at his peak value. That’s the problem with trading for picks 2-3 years away (which people were convinced the Rams would suck by now and these would be higher picks btw). Each year away the pick is the further in value it drops. Fitt was clearly hired based on turning us around quickly. It’s one of the many reasons tanking isn’t really a thing as our player JJ is telling you in this original article. It would take the whole organization from the owners down admitting they aren’t winning soon with Burns and picks 2-3 years away having more value because that’s when we are still rebuilding. It would only make sense if Fitt had a longer leash and would more than likely be the ones making these picks anyway which you wouldn’t want. The question is would you rather have those Rams picks with the strong possibility of Fitt still being here or would you rather Fitt try to “win now” like he did and expedite his firing? Altering the timeline would affect more than just the Rams picks. 
×
×
  • Create New...