Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Land For Sale


Daddy_Uncle
 Share

Recommended Posts

11 hours ago, Cdparr7 said:

Interested to see what they do at the 77/277 interchange. Likely enough room to build a stadium on one side with a bridge over the highway for parking access. 
 

Or they could just build the HQ/Practice Facility there and leave the stadium in the same place. 
 

Or they could build a soccer field/concert venue so we can get our fugging grass back!

Freedom Feet GIF by Hysteria

Edited by ncstatekwi
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, GRWatcher said:

I clearly remember that, when the stadium was first designed and built, it was said to be built in such a manner that later a dome could be added. I don't know if that's still feasible because of the years of renovations. 

But they don't hear me though. The worst word in the English language is "can't", we should abolish that word all together.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, GRWatcher said:

I clearly remember that, when the stadium was first designed and built, it was said to be built in such a manner that later a dome could be added. I don't know if that's still feasible because of the years of renovations. 

Those huge billboards would have to be moved inward for it to work. It looks like it can be done though.

Otherwise, looking and observing one can see just that, it looks like it's made to be roof ready. 

Creative solutions can change outcomes. We don't have to put the retractable structure on top of the stadium.

These broadside arches could go on both sides and build over and around BofA. That way the stadium itself isn't disturbed and games can still go on until testing.

We could innovate using stacked panels of gorilla glass or something similar. Each panel is fed into the arches via huge motor system inside the arches.

Each individual panels would then be sent over the tracks in the arches to form a semi roof over the stadium.

There isn't anything we can't achieve here in 2022 this project isn't as impossible as some may think.

The arches would add to the uptown landscape. They'd be functional art over the uptown landscape. Further landmarking.

I'm totally on board with modernizing the old girl with such a project. Like others have said, there's really nothing ugly about BofA. It's still somewhat of a modern design to this day.

That way if we decided to, in some kind of ownership/community partnership making practice fields, retail and a couple hotels, Charlotte would instantly have much more hosting capability for drawing large events in the stadium area and surrounding.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Really? You don't see why a team can't draft a QB in the 1st round while then starting their former #1 overall pick over them while on the last year of their deal? It puts the team in a TERRIBLE place no matter how the season goes.  If Bryce sucks, you have to answer questions as to why he was still on the team to begin with, let alone starting over the rookie.  If he's good, then you run into the situation the Vikings were in last offseason with sticking with the rookie contract or the the guy who just performed instead of said young QB. It's one thing when teams keep a vet around as a bridge QB, it's something entirely different when that QB is still only in their mid 20's and was taken #1 overall by that team.   That just doesn't happen and not sure it ever has in NFL history before.
    • What is the alternative? - BY, will not play for less then his perceived contract (just like Cam Newton did). So you pay him top of market as befitting a 1st round, Heisman winning, playing birthing QB would get. Or you cut him. - Then we are forced to either sign a stop gap QB / previously failed QB and try to fix him or you spend a 1st round pick and draft a guy, basically resetting the team.  The reality is that we all want a top 5 QB. The problem is there are only 5 of those guys in the world and drafting, even #1 overall doesn't guarantee that.  The other problem is the NFL market. Young QB get paid. Even an average, young QB gets top of market deals. I know a lot of people here think we could sign him to an 'average QB contract' but thats not reality. Didnt happen with Cam wont happen with BY.  So we could let this season flush out and he is again a middling QB. But then we cut and restart or accept it is what it is (including compensation) and build a team around what we have.  My money is on the latter. 
×
×
  • Create New...