Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

College Football Rivalry Week

jayboogieman

By jayboogieman,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, Catsfan69 said:

If you can't win your conference you shouldn't get into a 4 team playoff. 

I always said that there should be a requirement to at least play on a conference championship game in order to qualify for the playoffs. 

That year when Bama got in after losing to Auburn and Auburn got left out after beating Bama to get into the ACC CG but then list to UGA in that game... that was complete and utter fuging bullshit. Bama essentially got themselves a bye week by losing to Auburn. That should never happen.

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
OldhamA Grand Master

OldhamA

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, Brooklyn 3.0 said:

There are definitely exceptions, but it should be the general rule. But this could be one of those exceptions. It's not their fault the two best teams in the Big 10 are in the same "division".

Nope, no exceptions.

The Playoffs should always have been the 4 best P5 champions. It's not that hard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Popsickle Proficient

Popsickle

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, OldhamA said:

Nope, no exceptions.

The Playoffs should always have been the 4 best P5 champions. It's not that hard.

It never would have been just the P5, that’s why the Bowl Coalition ended due to BYU and others taking it to the Federal Government saying there was a monopoly. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • tukafan21
      Bryce Young 5th year option exercised

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      Really? You don't see why a team can't draft a QB in the 1st round while then starting their former #1 overall pick over them while on the last year of their deal? It puts the team in a TERRIBLE place no matter how the season goes.  If Bryce sucks, you have to answer questions as to why he was still on the team to begin with, let alone starting over the rookie.  If he's good, then you run into the situation the Vikings were in last offseason with sticking with the rookie contract or the the guy who just performed instead of said young QB. It's one thing when teams keep a vet around as a bridge QB, it's something entirely different when that QB is still only in their mid 20's and was taken #1 overall by that team.   That just doesn't happen and not sure it ever has in NFL history before.
    • CanadianCat
      Where panthers draft ranked against Big Boards in 2023

      By CanadianCat · Posted

      What is the alternative? - BY, will not play for less then his perceived contract (just like Cam Newton did). So you pay him top of market as befitting a 1st round, Heisman winning, playing birthing QB would get. Or you cut him. - Then we are forced to either sign a stop gap QB / previously failed QB and try to fix him or you spend a 1st round pick and draft a guy, basically resetting the team.  The reality is that we all want a top 5 QB. The problem is there are only 5 of those guys in the world and drafting, even #1 overall doesn't guarantee that.  The other problem is the NFL market. Young QB get paid. Even an average, young QB gets top of market deals. I know a lot of people here think we could sign him to an 'average QB contract' but thats not reality. Didnt happen with Cam wont happen with BY.  So we could let this season flush out and he is again a middling QB. But then we cut and restart or accept it is what it is (including compensation) and build a team around what we have.  My money is on the latter. 
    • mrcompletely11
      Vrabel and Russini? Athletic investigating.

      By mrcompletely11 · Posted

      That doesn't void his contract 
×
×
  • Create New...