Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Anthony Richardson declares for the draft


Ricky Spanish
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Catsfan69 said:

Yes probably better than anyone in this draft.

Sam's problems are mental not physical. 

 

Richardsons main problem is physical. He has an unguided rocket launcher and he has no idea where it's going.

Think bad Randy Johnson.

Lol I love this shtick 

Edited by mrcompletely11
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Catsfan69 said:

Yes probably better than anyone in this draft.

Sam's problems are mental not physical. 

 

Richardsons main problem is physical. He has an unguided rocket launcher and he has no idea where it's going.

Think bad Randy Johnson.

Bad Randy Johnson turned into good Randy Johnson. Darnold has never been good. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Kentucky Panther said:

Here are the stats of the guy you guys are slobbering over 

8CB57187-9BFE-47BA-A680-4F804BE5814A.thumb.jpeg.6a5bdff99d1a6f23682cf91cfc62ab12.jpeg

Here are the stats of the QB this place whines about most often 

55BEDE4F-2DEE-4C51-B093-B408BDA9C5F9.thumb.jpeg.f19a5dffc4c1000dc6239417d2bda988.jpeg

He’s only beaten in accuracy, yards per pass, touchdowns, and rating. Things, you know, you look for when drafting a quarterback. When we draft a QB, I can only hope this place is upset about it. It’s at that point, I know we have found our man. 

I don’t have a problem with Levis. He is a good bit older than Richardson, not as fast, but he might be right there with him on arm strength. Levis has a cannon. I think Stroud, AR, and Levis will all need a good staff to further develop them. Young is probably the most pro ready, but he has less of a ceiling IMO and of course his size could be an issue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ForJimmy said:

I don’t have a problem with Levis. He is a good bit older than Richardson, not as fast, but he might be right there with him on arm strength. Levis has a cannon. I think Stroud, AR, and Levis will all need a good staff to further develop them. Young is probably the most pro ready, but he has less of a ceiling IMO and of course his size could be an issue.

Hopefully we don’t take either. Although I fear it my be the case with our cake of a schedule remaining. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Kentucky Panther said:

Here are the stats of the guy you guys are slobbering over 

8CB57187-9BFE-47BA-A680-4F804BE5814A.thumb.jpeg.6a5bdff99d1a6f23682cf91cfc62ab12.jpeg

Here are the stats of the QB this place whines about most often 

55BEDE4F-2DEE-4C51-B093-B408BDA9C5F9.thumb.jpeg.f19a5dffc4c1000dc6239417d2bda988.jpeg

He’s only beaten in accuracy, yards per pass, touchdowns, and rating. Things, you know, you look for when drafting a quarterback. When we draft a QB, I can only hope this place is upset about it. It’s at that point, I know we have found our man. 

Now do Levis stats against the four common opponents he has with Richardson and compare the two. Explain why when facing the same teams Richardson blew away Levis?

If touchdowns matter then don’t forget the 2 Levis had on the ground and the 9 Richardson did. Less picks, more total touchdowns, more yards. 

Edited by Varking
  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Kentucky Panther said:

Hopefully we don’t take either. Although I fear it my be the case with our cake of a schedule remaining. 

Both have high ceilings and seem like the leaders of their teams. With the right staff hopefully they can develop into something special if we draft one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Varking said:

Now do Levis stats against the four common opponents he has with Richardson and compare the two. Explain why when facing the same teams Richardson blew away Levis?

They both play in the SEC. They both play an ACC team to end the year. I don’t need to pick and choose different games to fit my argument. I have 12 games to look at. 
 

Four different times this year Richardson couldn’t complete 10 or more passes in a game. Not one, not two,  four. The boards sudden obsession with him is truly one of the more mesmerizing things I’ve seen on a sports message board. There is no stat or combination of stats that says he’s going to be any good at the next level. He’s athletic and has a big arm. He’s also barely completing half of his passes. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Kentucky Panther said:

They both play in the SEC. They both play an ACC team to end the year. I don’t need to pick and choose different games to fit my argument. I have 12 games to look at. 
 

Four different times this year Richardson couldn’t complete 10 or more passes in a game. Not one, not two,  four. The boards sudden obsession with him is truly one of the more mesmerizing things I’ve seen on a sports message board. There is no stat or combination of stats that says he’s going to be any good at the next level. He’s athletic and has a big arm. He’s also barely completing half of his passes. 

They have four common opponents and Richardson outplayed Levis against every one of them. That’s why you want to avoid the conversation. If you want to know why he’s completing half his passes just go watch my team try and catch passes. Nobody took more of a step backwards from last year to now than Levis and you’re upset lol. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Varking said:

They have four common opponents and Richardson outplayed Levis against every one of them. That’s why you want to avoid the conversation. If you want to know why he’s completing half his passes just go watch my team try and catch passes. Nobody took more of a step backwards from last year to now than Levis and you’re upset lol. 

Picking and choosing what games you want to argue means nothing to me. Those four games are what you cling to because they are truly the only numbers that work in Richardsons favor. 
 

The only one upset here you is little man. Sorry not everybody loves a QB prospect that hits one of two throws. And I watched plenty of Florida this year to know blaming your receivers is an extreme cop out. 
 

But don’t forget! Those four games! 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Varking said:

Now do Levis stats against the four common opponents he has with Richardson and compare the two. Explain why when facing the same teams Richardson blew away Levis?

If touchdowns matter then don’t forget the 2 Levis had on the ground and the 9 Richardson did. Less picks, more total touchdowns, more yards. 

Because the 21 other players at Florida are better than the 21 other players at Kentucky. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • What?!?!?! Chark's 1,000 yard season was 4 years before he played for us and he only had 525 yards in 15 games as our #1 WR.  Dude has 3,100 yards in 7 seasons, he's the literal definition of a JAG and you think he is better than half our current WR room? T-Mac is literally already better than Chark was at his peak, which again, was years before he ever even put on a Panthers uniform, and there is a real argument to be made that XL and Coker were both better as rookies than Chark was for us in his one season here.
    • Im glad we're starting low. It's nonsensical to put us at 28 IMHO based on objective things IMHO (I think 21-24) is far more appropriate but whatever. Washington was at the bottom last year FWIW.  In 2003, Sports Illustrated said our best chance to win the division was to transfer to the ACC. In 2015, everyone wrote us off as a team that snuck into the playoffs with a losing record in 2014 and lost our best WR in TC (Kelvin Benjamin). All these videos are fodder for conversation, but this prediction has no more validity than saying the Panthers are making the SB bc we're starting the season against the Jaguars again. If Bryce plays like he did down the stretch we will end up the season just fine. This roster is much better than it has been the last 2 seasons. No one knows who any season will ultimately end up, but this team is finally being built in the right way, and the idea that this roster can't compete this year is as insane as being it was when we were gaslit in 2023 that we were a rookie QB from winning the division with that roster.  
    • Im glad we're starting low. It's nonsensical to put us at 28 IMHO based on objective things IMHO (I think 21-24) is far more appropriate but whatever. Washington was at the bottom last year FWIW.  In 2003, Sports Illustrated said our best chance to win the division was to transfer to the ACC. In 2015, everyone wrote us off as a team that snuck into the playoffs with a losing record in 2014 and lost our best WR in TC (Kelvin Benjamin). All these videos are fodder for conversation, but this prediction has no more validity than saying the Panthers are making the SB bc we're starting the season against the Jaguars again. If Bryce plays like he did down the stretch we will end up the season just fine. This roster is much better than it has been the last 2 seasons. No one knows who any season will ultimately end up, but this team is finally being built in the right way, and the idea that this roster can't compete this year is as insane as being it was when we were gaslit in 2023 that we were a rookie QB from winning the division with that roster.  
×
×
  • Create New...