Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Pacioretty Wants To Remain In Carolina


MillionDollarCam
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • 1 month later...
  • 4 weeks later...

Found this article from Finland where Pacioretty had his latest ACL surgery. His previous surgery on his ACL tear was done in Raleigh, which as you know he re-injured only 5 months after that first surgery. This time it’s a more reasonable 8-9 months minimum if he is able to return to hockey.

https://www-is-fi.translate.goog/nhl/art-2000009353145.html?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=fr&_x_tr_pto=wapp

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, DavidEng said:

Found this article from Finland where Pacioretty had his latest ACL surgery. His previous surgery on his ACL tear was done in Raleigh, which as you know he re-injured only 5 months after that first surgery. This time it’s a more reasonable 8-9 months minimum if he is able to return to hockey.

https://www-is-fi.translate.goog/nhl/art-2000009353145.html?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=fr&_x_tr_pto=wapp

Achilles. Not acl. 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/20/2023 at 3:59 PM, MillionDollarCam said:

During Dundon’s radio show, he stated that the Canes anticipate bringing Patches back next year. I imagine they’ll sign him to some 1 year / $2.5M deal that has bonuses if certain performance metrics are met.

He'll surely be back next season.

With Fast, Staal, Statsny and Stepan all UFAs at the end of the year, I don't see how they don't keep him.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Anybodyhome said:

He'll surely be back next season.

With Fast, Staal, Statsny and Stepan all UFAs at the end of the year, I don't see how they don't keep him.

Fast, is the first resign in my book. Followed closely by Staal. I’d like to keep Ghost, he and Chatfield make a good third pair. After that Max. Then we got to do at least one goalie… ugh. 
 

Though I did hear somewhere a rumor that the cap is getting a decent bump this offseason. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, Harbingers said:

Fast, is the first resign in my book. Followed closely by Staal. I’d like to keep Ghost, he and Chatfield make a good third pair. After that Max. Then we got to do at least one goalie… ugh. 
 

Though I did hear somewhere a rumor that the cap is getting a decent bump this offseason. 

I actually don’t think Fast will be back.

I think next years lineup will be something like.

Forwards

Pacioretty - Aho - Jarvis

Svechnikov - Kotkaniemi - Necas

Teravainen - Staal - Puljujarvi

Martinook - Drury - Noesen

Rees

Defensemen

Slavin - Burns

Skjei - Pesce

Gostisbehere - Chatfield

Goalies

???

Kochetkov


With Svech likely to miss the first bit of the season, I could see us maybe going after someone like Bertuzzi as well.

 

 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, MillionDollarCam said:

I actually don’t think Fast will be back.

I think next years lineup will be something like.

Forwards

Pacioretty - Aho - Jarvis

Svechnikov - Kotkaniemi - Necas

Teravainen - Staal - Puljujarvi

Martinook - Drury - Noesen

Rees

Defensemen

Slavin - Burns

Skjei - Pesce

Gostisbehere - Chatfield

Goalies

???

Kochetkov


With Svech likely to miss the first bit of the season, I could see us maybe going after someone like Bertuzzi as well.

 

 

I’d disagree. We might have to throw in another few million but that will be covered by the cap raise. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Harbingers said:

I’d disagree. We might have to throw in another few million but that will be covered by the cap raise. 

For me, it’s more about his age. I think RBA wants that grinder line to get younger.

I’m guessing Fast will want a three year deal to take him to 34/35 years old, I don’t see the Canes doing that.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I had started typing my post hours ago and didn’t finish it and just came back to finish it, posted it, then saw yours and saw we were pretty much saying the same thing - even the games that stick out to us most.  I don’t think a lot of people remember that SF playoff game, but I felt like I had just got mugged in broad daylight.  I remember them calling Mitchell for unnecessary roughness, and then I remember watching Boldin take a super late cheap shot, dead in front of the ref and then showing him watching the whole thing in replay…  the refs let them have a fuging field day and didn’t do jack poo, but if we so much as breathed the wrong way it was fuging 15 yards.  Each team playing under two completely different sets of rules.  poo hurt.  I was enraged.  I’ve never went back to watch either that game or SB50 and never will.  fuging robbery.
    • I’ve said it a million times since, but it’s impossible to keep them from affecting the game.  In SB50, they literally took the game from us, and they did it early.  Cotchery’s no-catch?  The miraculous amount of times we converted for a first down only to have it suddenly called back make it a 3rd down and 15+ against the best defense in the league that specialized in rushing the passer and man coverage on the back end?  And you do that enough times, you kill the morale and confidence of the team you’re doing it against.  It’s telling the one team “you can do whatever with impunity” and the other “you can’t do whatever they’re allowed to do.”  It changes the aggression level.  It essentially neuters one team and allows the other to do whatever the fug they want.  Imagine you call the police for help and they get there and tell you to sit still while the other party beats the poo out of you and you can’t defend yourself.  That’s what the officials do.  There is no way to avoid them affecting the game.  And more often than not, it’s the most subjective calls they use to do so.  Even in SB50…  you saw the Broncos commit more egregious penalties than anything we did, and barely any of it was called.  Their OL was holding all fuging game and the refs did nothing.  We already had our work cut out for us against two future HOF edge rushers and the refs played to their advantage with that.  From what I remember, both Oher and Remmers were called for holding at various times and their hands were in the INSIDE of the defender.  It was garbage, but all by design. Also, if there is any video of it anywhere, go look at what the refs did against us back in 2013 against SF.  The fix was in there too.  They stepped in early and often and ensured we knew we were not allowed to play with the same aggression or intensity SF was.  It was disgusting as well. at this point, I hope Vince McMahon, errr, I mean Goodell just finally scripts us to win it, because this poo is not won via competition or off merit.
    • You can go back to the New York Knicks somehow getting Patrick Ewing.  I saw a story where they place the New York Knick card in the freezer right before the drawing.  It was simple.  Show everyone the cards are undetectable to the human eye.  All they had to do was grab the coldest card. IMO ever since Goodell took over the NFL it has been fishy.  Patriots winning the SB after 9/11, New Orleans after Katrina and Peyton Manning's going away gift against us. The terrible calls during that game were blatantly one sided.  New England should have been stripped of their first 3 SB when they were caught spying on the other team in their SB wins.  I think the evidence against the Patriots was so damning Goodell felt it could ruin football and they brushed it under the table.   In the 2004 SB, How did we go from practically no yards in the first Quarter to setting a record in the 3rd Qtr.  Dan Henning changes the game plan.  IMO probably the greatest half time adjustment of all time.  
×
×
  • Create New...